By Darkmoon Commenters
SARDONICUS : The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a book that manages only too well in stirring up anti-Jewish feeling, especially in the Middle East where the Arabs have good reason to hate Israel because of the theft of Palestine. It has become the bible of the anti-Semites even in the West.
These people get very angry (like the ex-poster Lobro did on this site some time ago) if you tell them that the work is a “literary hoax”. They get angry because they think you are attacking the book and what it says. In fact, you are not doing this at all. You are praising the book for its astuteness, its political nous, its predictive genius, and, finally, for its extraordinary success as a satirical spoof — essentially a satirical work of fiction written by an anti-Semitic genius of the calibre of Jonathan Swift.
Lasha Darkmoon once thought that this book could have been written by Dostoevsky, an anti-Semitic genius who lived in the right era to write it, and who left the manuscript among his unpublished papers … and that it was later picked up and kept ready for use by the Tsar’s secret police. But she has now changed her mind about this. Dostoevsky, though a genius, just didn’t have the satirical gifts of Jonathan Swift. LD thinks the book shows evidence of a French hand, probably written by a satirical genius cast in the same mould as Voltaire.
ADMIN TOBY : Even Nesta Webster, I think, would agree now with hindsight that the Protocols is NOT a genuine document written by Jews, as she had once supposed, but an inspired work of fiction disguised as fact.
FLOPOT : I think the Protocols was written by an enemy of the Supremacist Jews, but constructed and presented as an internal document purportedly emanating from some nefarious committee of powerful Jews. But I have never before considered it a deliberate work of “fiction”, or a satire on the feverish scuttling, to and fro, of the gilded rats in their pipes and sewers.
The narrative voice of the Protocols is a fascinating construct — oblique, sneering and vile all at once. Yes, it has to be a work of literary fiction! — it is easy to imagine the true author (an enemy of international Jewry) sitting down and pretending to listen to one of these conspirators babble on gloatingly about all the dirty tricks up their sleeves.
FRANKLIN RYCKAERT : The Protocols are “true fiction” , i.e. they are fiction but they aptly describe how Jews really think and act and in that sense they are “true”. Because its author (a genius no doubt) understood Jewish behavior in the past and in the present, by extrapolation he also could predict how they would act in the future. That is why readers of the Protocols are struck by its uncanny accuracy and therefore many refuse to believe they are not genuine. People who point out the fictitiousness of the Protocols are then seen by such people as “working for the Jews”. The key to understanding this problem is to understand the meaning of “true fiction”.
SARDONICUS : Bravo, bravo! I couldn’t have put it better! What you say is 100 per cent true!
But why is it so hard convincing the diehard anti-Semites who believe that you are “working for the Jews” if you dare to state the blindingly obvious truth: that the Protocols was NOT a book written by Jews, setting out their secret plans for Jewish world domination, but by an unknown anti-Semitic genius as a satirical spoof or “true fiction” disguised as fact?
In this sense, the Protocols is indeed a “hoax”. A brilliant and successful hoax that is unique in every way: because it tells the truth in fictional form, like Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four.
(Editor’s note: The Protocols was apparently one of Orwell’s favourite bedside books. He is thought to have read it over 20 times. Many of the ideas in Orwell’s novelistic masterpiece came straight out of the Protocols.)
SARDONICUS : For what it is worth, Lasha Darkmoon wrote this to me in a private email last year:
“The Protocols a ‘forgery’? No, this is an emotive term concocted by the Jews and their supporters to rubbish the Protocols and make the book seem worthless. It cannot be a “forgery” for the simple reason that there is no original it can be compared to. The Protocols a shocking ‘plagiarism’? No, this too is an emotive term intended to discredit the book. The fact that the book borrows many of its ideas from previous books (like Machiavelli’s The Prince) does not make it a worthless plagiarism. If so, Newton is a “plagiarist” for following in the footsteps of Copernicus and Galileo and for saying “I stand on the shoulders of others.” And the biggest plagiarist of all would be Shakespeare for “stealing” most of his plots from Holinshed, Boccaccio and Plutarch.”
ALPHA AND OMEGA (to Franklin Ryckaert) : How can you be so sure that the Protocols are ‘ true fiction’? It’s just your opinion. Nothing more! You speak as a Jew, a hidden Jew protecting Jewish interests.
ADMIN TOBY : We reject the above comment as ill-informed and stupid. Franklin Ryckaert is not a Jew but a self-confessed anti-Semite. (See here). Please go away and read the latest comments on the Protocols by Sardonicus and Flopot (above) who give their backing to Ryckaert in every way. And then come back with a further comment if you wish.
ALPHA AND OMEGA : Thank you for the link you have provided. But I am not convinced about Franklin Ryckaert. I have been reading his comments for six months and only a jew could have written his comments, in the interest of the jew narrative. So or he is a jew or he has changed side. Maybe met a nice jewess, good pay by the jews or even threatened by the jews? It’s all possible. Or maybe he has always been a hidden jew and sold himself as “antisemite” for his curriculum vitae, by writing “antisemitism” articles as your link provides.
Or maybe Darkmoon.me is just a Tel Aviv site?
My opinion is that this is just another jewish site pretending to be “antisemitic” as many, many posters already have expressed. How much do the jews pay You all for being desinfo-agents?
ADMIN TOBY : I allow your comment, but reject it totally. No more comments from you please. This is your last one.