The ‘Protocols of Zion’ as an Inspired Work of Fiction

By Darkmoon Commenters

SARDONICUS : The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a book that manages only too well in stirring up anti-Jewish feeling, especially in the Middle East where the Arabs have good reason to hate Israel because of the theft of Palestine. It has become the bible of the anti-Semites even in the West.

These people get very angry (like the ex-poster Lobro did on this site some time ago) if you tell them that the work is a “literary hoax”. They get angry because they think you are attacking the book and what it says. In fact, you are not doing this at all.  You are praising the book for its astuteness, its political nous, its predictive genius, and, finally, for its extraordinary success as a satirical spoof — essentially a satirical work of fiction written by an anti-Semitic genius of the calibre of Jonathan Swift.

Lasha Darkmoon once thought that this book could have been written by Dostoevsky, an anti-Semitic genius who lived in the right era to write it, and who left the manuscript among his unpublished papers … and that it was later picked up and kept ready for use by the Tsar’s secret police. But she has now changed her mind about this. Dostoevsky, though a genius, just didn’t have the satirical gifts of Jonathan Swift. LD thinks the book shows evidence of a French hand, probably written by a satirical genius cast in the same mould as Voltaire.

ADMIN TOBY : Even Nesta Webster, I think, would agree now with hindsight that the Protocols is NOT a genuine document written by Jews, as she had once supposed, but an inspired work of fiction disguised as fact.

FLOPOT :  I think the Protocols was written by an enemy of the Supremacist Jews,  but constructed and presented as an internal document purportedly emanating from some nefarious committee of powerful Jews. But I have never before considered it a deliberate work of “fiction”, or a satire on the feverish scuttling, to and fro, of the gilded rats in their pipes and sewers.

The narrative voice of the Protocols is a fascinating construct — oblique, sneering and vile all at once. Yes, it has to be a work of literary fiction! — it is easy to imagine the true author (an enemy of international Jewry) sitting down and pretending to listen to one of these conspirators babble on gloatingly about all the dirty tricks up their sleeves.

FRANKLIN RYCKAERT :  The Protocols are “true fiction” , i.e. they are fiction but they aptly describe how Jews really think and act and in that sense they are “true”. Because its author (a genius no doubt) understood Jewish behavior in the past and in the present, by extrapolation he also could predict how they would act in the future. That is why readers of the Protocols are struck by its uncanny accuracy and therefore many refuse to believe they are not genuine. People who point out the fictitiousness of the Protocols are then seen by such people as “working for the Jews”. The key to understanding this problem is to understand the meaning of “true fiction”.

SARDONICUS :  Bravo, bravo! I couldn’t have put it better! What you say is 100 per cent true!

But why is it so hard convincing the diehard anti-Semites who believe that you are “working for the Jews” if you dare to state the blindingly obvious truth: that the Protocols was NOT a book written by Jews, setting out their secret plans for Jewish world domination, but by an unknown anti-Semitic genius as a satirical spoof or “true fiction” disguised as fact?

In this sense, the Protocols is indeed a “hoax”. A brilliant and successful hoax that is unique in every way: because it tells the truth in fictional form, like Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four.

(Editor’s note: The Protocols was apparently one of Orwell’s favourite bedside books. He is thought to have read it over 20 times. Many of the ideas in Orwell’s novelistic masterpiece came straight out of the Protocols.)

SARDONICUS : For what it is worth, Lasha Darkmoon wrote this to me in a private email last year:

“The Protocols a ‘forgery’? No, this is an emotive term concocted by the Jews and their supporters to rubbish the Protocols and make the book seem worthless. It cannot be a “forgery” for the simple reason that there is no original it can be compared to. The Protocols a shocking ‘plagiarism’? No, this too is an emotive term intended to discredit the book. The fact that the book borrows many of its ideas from previous books (like Machiavelli’s The Prince) does not make it a worthless plagiarism. If so, Newton is a “plagiarist” for following in the footsteps of Copernicus and Galileo and for saying “I stand on the shoulders of others.” And the biggest plagiarist of all would be Shakespeare for “stealing” most of his plots from Holinshed, Boccaccio and Plutarch.”

ALPHA AND OMEGA (to Franklin Ryckaert) :  How can you be so sure that the Protocols are ‘ true fiction’? It’s just your opinion. Nothing more! You speak as a Jew, a hidden Jew protecting Jewish interests.

ADMIN TOBY : We reject the above comment as ill-informed and stupid. Franklin Ryckaert is not a Jew but a self-confessed anti-Semite. (See here). Please go away and read the latest comments on the Protocols by Sardonicus and Flopot (above) who give their backing to Ryckaert in every way. And then come back with a further comment if you wish.

ALPHA AND OMEGA :  Thank you for the link you have provided. But I am not convinced about Franklin Ryckaert. I have been reading his comments for six months and only a jew could have written his comments, in the interest of the jew narrative. So or he is a jew or he has changed side. Maybe met a nice jewess, good pay by the jews or even threatened by the jews? It’s all possible. Or maybe he has always been a hidden jew and sold himself as “antisemite” for his curriculum vitae, by writing “antisemitism” articles as your link provides.

Or maybe is just a Tel Aviv site?

My opinion is that this is just another jewish site pretending to be “antisemitic” as many, many posters already have expressed. How much do the jews pay You all for being desinfo-agents?

ADMIN TOBY : I allow your comment, but reject it totally. No more comments from you please. This is your last one.

VIDEO : 15.32 mins

(If you can’t get this video on your computer, try clicking on THIS LINK)

56 thoughts to “The ‘Protocols of Zion’ as an Inspired Work of Fiction”

  1. BARKING DEER : “… If the protocols were faked, and i don’t think so (in fact it seems a desperate stretch to say they were a “brilliant” fake, because they’re so accurate), they were more likely faked by the jews themselves, the rabbi class… because, the truth is, the big jews want jews well hated by every form of goyim, so they won’t forget their tribe…”.

    There is some truth in this idea. Occasionally you hear some Jews saying that “anti-Semitism is actually good for Jews”. They think so because :1) It inspires them to ethnic cohesion and prevents assimilation, 2) It depicts Jews as “eternal victims” and as parasites that is their best camouflage. Theodor Hertzl once said that “Anti-Semites will be our best friends”, meaning that anti-Semitism will cause the Jews to emigrate to his planned Jewish state in Palestine. Then there is the phenomenon of the typical Jewish hate hoax of painting swastikas on Jewish tomb stones and synagogues with the subsequent whining about “rising anti-Semitism”. What Jews want with such actions however is not active persecution, but a rather mild form of hostility.

    I think that claiming that the Protocols themselves are also such a hate hoax is a bridge too far. The accurate depiction of their way of thinking and acting in the Protocols has been a major source of the world’s hostility towards them in modern times. Presently the Protocols are highly popular in the Arab world. The Jews universally condemn the Protocols as false, and frankly it serves them no useful purpose at all. It is the same as with the idea that the Jews “invented Christianity as a weapon against the goyim”. That too didn’t serve them any purpose at all and Jews throughout history have been enemies of Christianity. Always when constructing a conspiracy theory ask the question “who benefits ?” People always act in self-interest.

      1. Thanks, Franklin. I’ve added the above link to the article. So maybe everyone has access to the video now. Depends how long YouTube will allow it before they pull the plug…

    1. “I think that claiming that the Protocols themselves are also such a hate hoax is a bridge too far. The accurate depiction of their way of thinking and acting in the Protocols has been a major source of the world’s hostility towards them in modern times. Presently the Protocols are highly popular in the Arab world. The Jews universally condemn the Protocols as false, and frankly it serves them no useful purpose at all. It is the same as with the idea that the Jews “invented Christianity as a weapon against the goyim”. That too didn’t serve them any purpose at all and Jews throughout history have been enemies of Christianity. Always when constructing a conspiracy theory ask the question “who benefits ?” People always act in self-interest.”

      on the other hand, it is in the self interest of the jews, especially the ones who control judaism/zionism, for cohesive purposes that they have enemies and be ostracized, in order that the tribe be maintained and excused in its crimes…. so, it might even be likely that jews did write the protocols, for that purpose primarily.. but it is no stretch either that globalist zionists, who have murdered millions and millions of goyim, would see them carried out exactly…
      obviously, like the european juden strasse ghettos, the state of israel was created and jews forcefully migrated there so that they would cease assimilating into other cultures, and so that judaism, the first support platform of bankster zionism, would not be forgotten…

    2. On balance I am inclined to believe that the protocols are genuine. They reveal the contempt that Jewish extremists hold gentiles in.

      1. The Jews will denigrate anything that puts them in a bad light. The Protocols are no exception. That’s one of the reasons I think they are probably genuine, probably written by extremist Russian Rabbis.

  2. The Protocols are an accurate statement of the goals of satanic Zionism and are proven accurate more and more with every passing year, especially with what is happening here in America.

    1. Agreed. No one is disagreeing with you. David Duke is not disagreeing with you, nor is anyone commenting on his video in the above article.

  3. Of course none of my comments get included in a Darkmoon feature piece, not only my comments don’t get included in any DM feature piece, my comments get CENSORED. I guess I said all kinds of crazy off-the-wall things about The Protocols in the post I sent uncle about “The Protocols”. Right, uncle? Did anyone ever tell you that your neice Lasha is a two-face double-minded dissimulating full-of-sh*t b*tch? No? Well I’m telling you now.

    ADMIN: Thanks, Joe. My apologies for “censoring” your comments in which you claim the right to insult us all with your foolish comments.

  4. I used to consider the “Protocols” a forgery because they were obviously inspired by Machiavelli’s answers in the “Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu” by Maurice Joly.

    The problem is that they are also substantially original, i.e., not copied from Joly at all.

    Whoever wrote them must have been one of the greatest political theorists of all time.

    One of the few really useful ideas I ever gleaned from the Protocols is that, in the society of the future, the Jews will fill the world with so many contradictory ideas that there will be endless confusion.

    It is obvious that, to our enemies, confusion is an end in itself, a sort of intellectual “divide and conquer” policy. The content of the ideas is irrelevant.

    1. @ Carlos Porter

      I think you’re right. Not only creating confusion, the clash of contradictory ideas, truth mixed with lies, disinfo and conspiracy theories manufactured to add to the toxic mix, but also information overload and one distraction after another. As you get on TV and the media. In the classic words of T.S. Eliot, “distracted from distracted by distraction.”

      Our ancestors had more time to think.To concentrate on the important issues. They didn’t spend all day in offices sending emails to each other and watching porn on the sly, only to come back home and flop down in fatigue in front of the TV and binge out on trash Hollywood movies and 100 other TV channels offering nothing but trivia, celeb talk, and jabber, jabber, jabber ad nauseam!

      This is a world designed to stop people thinking straight, and that suits the Jews fine! 🙂

    2. Carlos –

      “…the Jews will fill the world with so many contradictory ideas that there will be endless confusion.”…… using the cell ‘Towers of Babel’!!

    3. @ Carlos Porter

      Reading the Protocols of Zion makes me ill, so I don’t do it. I guess years ago I read most of it anyhow. There is one thing I obtained from it. Namely, the concept of the “aureole of power.” Over the years I have developed this concept that I first encountered in the Protocols. What I have come to think is that an aureole of power is something we see all the time, especially in buildings. It is actually a quality of a physical thing, even though it is a subtle thing to see.

  5. sigh!
    I dont understand Darkmoon sometimes..
    it was my comment (at the previous article) that GOT ALL THIS STUFF ABOUT THE PROTOCOLS GOING but i am not even mentioned in the above article…!!!
    I´ll just go back to working on my latest poetry piece…
    “White Girl on the train”
    “when the fox hears the rabbit scream, he comes a-runnin´but not to help”

    1. Writing poetry is so over-rated. It is as easy as replacing butter in a butter-dish. Mastery of the medium is as straightforward as using a butter knife. Watch and observe…

      There I was
      Sitting on Aeron’s Stair
      Hunched over my haunches
      like a Hunchback
      On a Stair-as-Well.

      Deep in thought
      like what that Rodin
      Thing might be
      Outside the British Library.
      He does Stare-as-Well

      Postured like a thinking
      person that chews the cud
      Wondering why he she they
      Sits on that thinking stair,
      It does Stir-as-Well.

      See? Easy. If you want more of this stuff then please donate to my Patreon account. Unfortunately there will be a delay in any new poetical constructions because I stabbed myself with a butter-knife whilst trying to wedge a new block of butter into a dish.

      1. @ Flopot

        Give it up
        Your poetry
        ain’t got
        much to recommend it.
        So END it! 🙂

        You ain’t
        no poet
        nor ever
        will be.
        Tee-hee! 🙂

        (Admin, sorry about that!
        No more inspired pomes from my pen.)

      2. Lol. Sard, I would never face-off with you in one of those rapping…um…Face-Offs! Whatever they are called. Very good.

        Once I pull this butter-knife from my hand, I will write a new master-work of Lines and Carriage Returns.

        [To Admin: sorry; I will stop; hearty facetiousness and all that]

  6. In a book I wrote in 2014 I voiced the opinion that the Protocols of Zion was sophisticated disinformation. Namely, it was a true account of Jewish aims and methods written by Jews in such a way that it could be exposed as a forgery at a later date, then it was given to someone who was spying on them (Jews). The result was that White society was exposed to the idea of a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world and the various methods employed toward this end. Then the Protocols was exposed as a hoax. And thereafter anyone who talked about a Jewish conspiracy was seen as having been influenced by the hoax-book of the Protocols and ignored.

  7. The narrative voice of the Protocols reveals it as a work of literary fiction. I only just “got that” during my recent discussion with Sardonicus. Unfortunately I hear the voice when I recall the Protocols; I had always dismissed it as an awkward stylistic choice, with no particular intent. But it is the chatter of a villain. Just add a few maniacal outbursts of laughter after each section and you have your dramatic trope — the Expository Monologue of the Antagonist.

    “Ha ha ha ha! You will die soon, Mr Goy. Allow me to use up your final grains of sand to describe my dastardly plans”.

    So yes: a work of fiction describing some fatal truths.

  8. Of late, I have noticed Jews working overtime to destroy the remaining truths still evident on the web. Jews have accomplished this by sowing huge fields of disinformation. The Jews motto in this regard is, “if it cannot be denied outright, then lie about it until people can no longer separate the truth from our lies.”

    One of the latest victims of this campaign is Cesar Tort, over at The West’s Darkest Hour. Cesar has taken up the Jews’ favorite meme that Jesus never existed. We now have Richard Carrier, (one wonders what he is carrying and for whom) another exalted PhD writing postdoctoral dissertations as proof of this claim.

    Now I come over to Darkmoon to find the old “protocols are a forgery” bullshit once again cresting among readers. Protocols be damned! We are being destroyed and wasting time arguing over subjects of this nature makes Jews in the back room masturbate with glee.

    Never give the Jew a break, because they damn sure will never give you one. Jews have produced an endless number of lies and forgeries about the goyim, especially Jesus and Hitler. They never cease their attacks, they never admit they lied and they never apologize. Show me one goddamned Jew that ever came forward and admitted the phony Hitler’s diary was a forgery. It took David Irving to expose their lies.

    When white goyim make claims like this about the Protocols, they are doing the Jews work for them. How stupid can white people be? The Protocols are a plan, a very real plan. Anyone that cannot see the Protocols being played out today is a Jewdamned idiot. Those denying it are either Jews or (((their))) sycophants, be it willing or unwilling.
    By definition, a forgery is a false account or image of a genuine document or object. When one forges money, they do not make up their own version. Instead, they copy real bills and coins. When Jews called the Protocols a “forgery,” they made a true Freudian slip. Why the slip? Because Jews are a race of forgers. Perhaps the most recent infamous example of the Jew forger was Oded Golan. Of course, according to Jews, (the same race that insists the Protocols are a forgery) Golan was found innocent of forgery by an Israeli court. Get the full picture yet?
    Here is the standard white people should use with any questionable work or individual: lf it lies like a Jew, subverts like a Jew, deceives like a Jew, murders like a jew, sounds like a jew, thinks like a jew, writes like a jew, then it’s a GODDAMNED Jew – period.

    If fact smart whites should begin making up all the horrific lies they can about Jews and then spread those lies to a point where the gullible goyim cannot tell truth from lie. This shouldn’t be too difficult as the horrific truths lurking behind the Jew far exceeds the intellect of white people to comprehend. When it comes to Jews, one does not even have to lie, but spreading a huge number of lies muddies the intellectual waters, which is exactly why Jews do it to whitey.

    “The only statement I care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. THEY FIT IT NOW.” – Henry Ford

    Henry Ford was never tainted by Jewish media programming like today’s goyim. When it comes to Jews, I will listen to the words of his generation before I will listen to the modern pundit or commenters carrying water for the Jews, either willingly or unwillingly.

    Is it wrong to speak to volunteers they way I do?

    1. My standard response to a challenge that there is no proof Christ existed, is to inquire if the skeptic is aware of the Talmud. Expecting the usual negative reply, I then explain the ancient origins of the Talmud after the destruction of the Second Temple, and emphasize its centrality to modern Judaic thought. Then I whack ’em over the head with the fact that the Talmud admits the Jews killed Christ and they’re glad they did it!

      “If ya wanna disprove the historicity of Jesus take it up with the Jews, and leave me alone!”

      It helps to say that in a US twang of any shade; it ends the conversation with panache. If you can say it whilst mimicking Jack Nicholson’s trade mark style, then you will have a field day.

      1. @Flopout: So it never has crossed your mind that the Jews’ “admission to killing Jesus” in their Talmud, plus of course their condemnation of him (saying that he’s in hell, being boiled in his own feces), just might be a clever bit of psychological trickery itself? Do you not see how their willingness to play the part of the “children of Satan” actually supports the entire narrative that the buy-bull is “da reel troof”? Do you not understand that, contrary to popular goyim opinion, the Jews LOVE playing the role of “Christ killers”? That they DEPEND UPON the “antisemitism” and “religious persecution” of the Christian (and Islamic) goyim? Do you not understand that the Jews NEED to always be seen as “Satan’s children”? Good thing you never have ran across someone like me with your “wack ’em over the head” (ahem!) fact about the Talmud “admitting” to killing Jesus and all the rest. I’d have skinned you alive, metaphorically speaking of course. It’s obvious that you’re not even out of Jew-aware kindergarten… much less a graduate of Jewology 101 or a professor of Advanced Goyim Knowing like myself. Sorry to insult you… but your argument – – using the Talmud or anything else Jews have written, currently write, have said or currently say about Cheezus and the Buy Bull (negative or positive) as “proof” of anything, as a frame of reference for true reality – – is terribly flawed.

      2. @ Flopot

        I’ve used that same argument, and the reply is usually along the lines of “the Babylonin Talmud was written in the fourth century and is not a valid historical record” or something like that.

        I sometimes wonder: Wouldn’t it have better served their Satanic purposes if they had denied that Jesus ever existed rather than take credit for his execution?

      3. @Harold Smith

        The mention of Jesus in the Talmud does not prove anything about Jesus’ historicity. The Talmud was written when Christianity was already the established religion of the Byzantine Empire and Jews were discriminated against in that Empire. The Jews of Babylon, where the Talmud was written, didn’t live under Byzantine rule, but resented its policy towards their brethren in that Empire. They simply assumed that the founder of the religion hostile to their people, was a real historical person.

        The negative depiction of Jesus in the Talmud did not serve any “propagandistic purpose” at all, because the Talmud was not written for Goyim anyway. In the Talmud itself it is written that it is forbidden to teach Talmud to non-Jews. Before one concocts far fetched “conspiracy theories” about Jews in the past, first know what the actual historical situation was.

      4. @JIMB

        Your pun Buy Bull is clever, I suppose. However, it only has merit as a pun made long after the fact. It simply means book in romantic languages. As in bibliotheca being the word for library in Spanish.

        But you may be on to something about the Jews wanting to be known as the killers of God. That is pretty bad ass and can server to psyche out the non-Jews.

      5. @ Franklin Ryckaert

        “The negative depiction of Jesus in the Talmud did not serve any “propagandistic purpose” at all…”

        That’s your word not mine; I said “Satanic”.

        “because the Talmud was not written for Goyim anyway.”

        But the evil it stands for seriously *affects* us, no?

        “In the Talmud itself it is written that it is forbidden to teach Talmud to non-Jews. Before one concocts far fetched “conspiracy theories” about Jews in the past, first know what the actual historical situation was.”

        What “far fetched conspiracy theory” would that be?

      6. @Harold Smith

        The “far fetched conspiracy theory” is that the Jews wrote the Talmud deliberately with negative pictures of themselves in order to be hated by the world, while in reality the Talmud was never meant to be read by non-Jews.

    2. Hi Arch,
      Just remember. “Jews” are a very diverse group. Donaldo has Jewish blood from Grandpa. Donaldo is also a trucker. Was sitting in the lounge of a truckstop in Commerce, Georgia last week. Started a conversation with another driver. Discovered later that he was a Jew. Sometimes when Jews meet we just “sense” our Jewishness. In the DNA I suppose. He was a nice guy. We talked about driving and our experiences. We weren’t plotting World domination. Weren’t searching the area to abduct a child to sacrifice. Weren’t plotting a scheme to steal 💰 from people. We were just two men who had braved the dangers of the highway all day and were resting. It was New Year’s Eve. We were far from home. No hot food. No family nor the pleasure of a womans body. Tell me honestly amigo. Can you believe hateful and suspicious of Jews like us? Tell me please.

      1. @ Donaldo

        I think assimilated Jews are ruled by the true Jews who possess a corrupted moral faculty, and I don’t think they realize this.

  9. I was a Holocost denier for decades before I ever heard of the Protocols.
    When I briefly perused the order of battle and looked at all the pictures I thought, gosh, that’s not anything everyone doesn’t already know. It’s the opposite of Jesus, again.
    Carved into dark matter since the beginning.

  10. By my theory the Jews were born in ancient Sumer around 2,100 BC. What defines the Jewish mind, by my theory, is a false morality in which all connection with the conscience is lost.

    The Protocols of Zion reflect the false morality of the Jew. It is a separation from the conscience, therefore a lack of morality, which distinguishes the Jew from all other men.

    Only the White man can beat this ungodly Jewish stuff that has taken the world over. Only the White man who has national roots and racial roots can beat the Jewish beast. White racism is therefore justified, since it is in the interest of all mankind.

    Can the racified White American beat the Jew and take back his country? Yes, this can be done.

  11. I don’t think it really matters if in reality they are a work of fiction. What does matter is the accuracy and truth in the plan and execution of its programme by jews and non-jews being their target for exploitation.

  12. so true jimb – the jews will never cease screaming ‘antisemitism” and they’ll never let hitler die…
    while nobody else really gives a rat’s ass…
    most people would like to see the world move on to the next paradigm, beyond war and exploitation, religion, overpopulation, corporatism and environmental degradation…
    yet here we all are, working on their narrative, keeping he jew thing alive…

  13. “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion Decoded” :

    Read the whole thing, it’s very interesting and very informative and for those interested in Science it touches upon the very baneful and perfidious and insidious influence of The Synagogue of Satan on Science.

  14. uncle :

    Can I trust that you will [ eventually* ] put my “ + ‘The Protocols of the Elder of Zion Decoded'” on the commentary board, or, is it very naive of me to think you won’t CENSOR it?

    (ETC . . . ETC . . . ETC . . . )

    ADMIN TOBY: Pipe down, Joe! Your comment has just been posted. I don’t even time to READ your longwinded comments, including off-topic epic poems and obscene garbage of all kinds, let alone “CENSOR” your comments.

  15. I have read the Protocols. As arguments swirl about concerning “its” reliability and validity, a sound emanates like that of one thousand toilets flushed during a break in oculogyric action at a 21st century Coliseum (aka “NFL football stadium” — perhaps a former Disney “star” playing the role of Satan’s mistress). Perhaps only I have heard that. Maybe the Protocols were a kind of scorecard, a laundry list of “To Do’s”, leading those in favor to execute this plan faithfully, as developed by Elders, thus really caring not who wrote it up!

    First to mind, as I understand this, the Protocols appeared initially in a language other than English. Before one can speak to “voice” and|or “tone”, or judge “nonfiction” or “fiction”, must not we undertake a multi-lingual examination (Russian, French, translators to English, etc.)? Secondly, as would seem done in pieces already, one might parse out the many statements and assertions and intentions expressed in this remarkable document and connect dots to historically factual events, movements, supporting statements to date since the “discovery” of the Protocols, and other reasonable evidence of the perspicacity of the author and, here on Darkmoon, commenters alike!

    1. AD –

      Yep – – – “…a laundry list of “To Do’s”… done by jews like Madonna & GaGa. 🙂

  16. Here is another Jew lie:
    “The Jews are very, very smart”
    How can they be “very very smart” when they killed the Son of God?
    (i mean they could´ve went and messed with El Chapo´s son, or Pablo Escobar´s son, or Al capone´s son or Saddam Hussein´s son But, God´s Son?)

    Such “smart move” gave them hell for the next 2000 years, including getting kicked 119 times from all over the place, spat on, extremely despised, chronically hated and then they got Hitler who exposed them and on top of it now they have the nerve to come to Palestine to roost..
    Notice how a good detective will tell you that
    “Criminals always return to the scene of the crime”

    1. “…How can they be “very very smart” when they killed the Son of God..?”

      As a Muslim you should know that just like Muslims Jews don’t believe that God can have a “son”. So the Jews of that time didn’t believe they killed “the Son of God”. They thought they killed a “false Messiah”. And the Jews considered Jesus as a “false Messiah” because he didn’t bring an earthy kingdom (free from Roman rule) to the Jews, but preached a Spiritual Kingdom. Attacking the hypocrisy of the Pharisees and cleaning the temple of the money changers roused their wrath and they conspired to depict him as a “dangerous rebel” to the Romans, who – reluctantly – killed him.

  17. Avatar – get hold of yourself man…
    Epiphanate on this my friend – neither you nor your people will be served by religious fundamentalism… it is jamming your files, screwing with your circuitry, holding you demographied in the dark, keeping out the insights you need to throw off your oppressors… just as their own brand of fundamentalism prevents the Jews from becoming nice people, who would otherwise not go to Palestine and bulldoze some poor Arab’so house, running over and killing any idealistic young women who might try to stand in the way..
    Only when enough humans have risen above religious fundamentalism, broken the brainlock and become truthful, will the great subconscious ONE no longer authorize the archaic mean-ing of that which is imported to the mid-dle… until then you will get what you de-serve… all speech is event-full prayer, those who talk like fools must be treated like it by the universe… every thing that comes to pass has been authorized in the collective consciousness, whereupon we are all creative artists, each with his own p-art to play…
    Me, I would rather keep my mouth shut than to spout dogmatic religious particulars from more than two millenium ago… just sayin…

  18. If the Protocols are a forgery they’re a damn good forgery of the original document.

  19. reply to: COMMENTATOR MIKE…
    January 10, 2019 at 8:28 pm

    They are not a “forgery”, they are a document of unknown origin and authenticity, possibly a work of fiction, possibly partly not, partially inspired by Maurice Joly, partially not.

    Another example of the same sort of thing is the “Israel Cohen” quote from “A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century” in 1912. Cohen is described as a “Communist”. We used to see that all the time.

    There was an “Israel Cohen”, who was a Zionist, but not a Communist. No such document was ever found among his writings (which were voluminous, mostly written later). The source given is invariably the “U.S. Congressional Record”.

    The Republican Congressman who quoted the “Israel Cohen” document gave his source as Eustace Mullins. I contacted Mullins about this in the 1980s. He was still alive, but never replied. He could have said, “oh, I saw it in the Library of Congress or someplace, but can’t remember where”. But he didn’t. He just didn’t reply. I think he made it up.

    1. @Carlos Porter:

      For a good analysis of “A Racial Programme for the Twentieth Century” see Semitic Controversies :

      1) Some Brief Notes on Eustace Mullin’s Quotation from Israel Cohen’s ‘A Racial Programme for the Twentieth Century’.
      2) Israel Cohen’s ‘A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century’ Redux.

      The conclusion is that it is in all probability an invention by Eustace Mullin’s during the 1950s.

  20. I agree with Nesta Webster. A work of fiction like “1984” may be prescient in its broad predictions of human social evolution, but the Protocols have been acted out to the letter. It is indeed (((their))) playbook for total goy destruction… just as Communism is in truth, Judaism put into practice.

  21. More than a basic blueprint set of steps in a plan,
    If the ‘vision’ is well and thoroughly articulated into the collective consciousness, and where otherwise good men do nothing, the events might well fall into place..
    Orwell’s 1984 might as well have been such a manual toward today’s super surveillance global gangster Bankster state..
    And I’m telling you the bible has always been an instruction sheet for the perpetration and maintenance of deified monarchy and feudal exploitation…
    Since the trashing of the bill of rights with 9-11, the USA, finally devolved to a codified murderous police state with the NDAA, has been sundered as the light of the free world.. the Jews did 9-11.. they plotted the world wars. They killed Patton and the Kennedys, mckinley, Lincoln and huey long.. it’s their banking scam.. they made Facebook and Google..
    So why would anybody doubt they wrote the protocols?
    It’s working too..
    Of course the protocols were written by Jews.. and I’m certain every jew who ever read them nodded assent…
    You might not know it yet but they all understand it’s them against us, at least it always has been… and quite a bit of that was the result of the way Jews were abused for centuries by the other abrahamics, christians, muslims…
    The protocols give the Jews an articulated ‘goal’ (hardly the right word), and make it plain what they’re supposed to think…

  22. Now ensconced in the 21st Century, no turning back, it would seem high time to emulate the Essenes, presuming as I do the veracity of their “history” or, more precisely, their putative existence. I read once, lost the reference too long ago to search it out, that communities formed on the outskirts of the Roman Empire, one each of the necessary trades of the time. According to the archeologists who developed this “theory”, the communities evolved to become the major cities of Europe today.

    Hence, I propose for those living reasonably near-by [you can fly in from Hawaii, a demonrat nest of vipers], we jump start the process anew, here in the foothills of the Sierra Nevada. Far enough away from major faults — only 90 miles from Sacramento and its commie governor, but hey! 90 miles is too far for the bastards to walk should they pull the plug on our electrical power! we have solar and propane to tide us over such “glitches” imposed by state-controlled PG&E — we can create the next “civilization” as we have a mind to.

  23. Rabbi Reichhorn’s Protocols

    “Funeral Oration”
    The Fatal Discourse of Rabbi Reichhorn

    [“(In its issue of 21 October, 1920 (No. 195) La Vieille France published an extremely important Russian document in which the following passage occurs:

    ” ‘There is a striking analogy between the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion and the discourse of the Rabbi Reichhorn, pronounced in Prague in 1869 over the tomb of the Grand Rabbi Simeon-ben-Ihuda, and published by Readcliffe, who paid with his life for the divulgation. Sonol, who had taken Readcliffe to hear Reichhorn, was killed in a duel some time afterwards. The general ideas formulated by the Rabbi are found fully developed in the Protocols,’ (which were published about 35 years later).

    “In its issue of 10 March, 1921, (No. 214) La Vieille France gives the version of this funeral oration which was published in La Russie Juive. It is perfectly clear that the funeral oration and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion come from one and the same mint. Both are prophetic; and the power which made the prophecies has been able to bring about their fulfillment. There can no longer be any doubt as to whose is the power which is disturbing the world, creating World Unrest, and at the same time reaping all of the profits. Jewry is enslaving all Christian peoples of the earth. There IS a Jew World Plot and it now stands finally and completely unmasked).]

    “1. Every hundred years, We, the Sages of Israel, have been accustomed to meet in Sanhedrin in order to examine our progress towards the domination of the world which Jehovah has promised us, and our conquests over the enemy, Christianity.

    “2. This year, united over the tomb of our reverend Simeonben-Ihuda, we can state with pride that the past century has brought us very near to our goal, and that this goal will be very soon attained.”

    “3. Gold always has been and always will be the irresistible power. Handled by expert hands it will always be the most useful lever for those who possess it, and the object of envy for those who do not. With gold we can buy the most rebellious consciences, can fix the rate of all values, the current prices of all products, can subsidize all State loans, and thereafter hold the states at our mercy.”

    “4. Already the principal banks, the exchanges of the entire world, the credits of all governments, are in our hands.”

    “5. The other great power is THE PRESS. By repeating without cessation certain ideas, the Press succeeds in the end in having them accepted as actualities. The Theatre renders us analogous services. Everywhere the Press and the Theatre obey our orders.”

    “6. By the ceaseless praise of DEMOCRATIC RULE we shall divide the Christians into political parties, we shall destroy the unity of their nations, we shall sow discord everywhere. Reduced to impotence, they will bow before the LAW of OUR BANK, always united, and always devoted to our Cause.”

    “7. We shall force the Christians into wars by exploiting their pride and their stupidity. They will massacre each other, and clear the ground for us to put our people into.”

    “8. The possession of the land has always brought influence and power. In the name of social Justice and Equality we shall parcel out the great estates; we shall give the fragments to the peasants who covet them with all their powers, and who will soon be in debt to us by the expense of cultivating them.”
    Our capital will make us their masters. We in our turn shall become the great proprietors, and the possession of the land will assure the power to us.”

    “9. Let us try to replace the circulation of gold with paper money; our chests will absorb the gold, and we shall regulate the value of the paper which will make us masters of all the positions.”

    “10. We count among us plenty of orators capable of feigning enthusiasm and of persuading mobs. We shall spread them among the people to announce changes which should secure the happiness of the human race. By gold and by flattery we shall gain the proletariat which will charge itself with annihilating Christian capitalism. We shall promise workmen salaries of which they have never dared to dream, but we shall also raise the price of necessities so that our profits will be greater still.”

    “11. In this manner we shall prepare Revolutions which the Christians will make themselves, and of which we shall reap the fruit.”

    “12. By our mockeries and our attacks upon them we shall make their priests ridiculous then odious, and their religion as ridiculous and as odious as their clergy. Then we shall be masters of their souls. For our pious attachment to our own religion, to our own worship, will prove the superiority of our religion and the superiority of our souls.”

    “13. We have established our own men in all important positions. We must endeavor to provide the Goyim with lawyers and doctors; the lawyers are au courant with all interests; doctors, once in the house, become confessors and directors of consciences.”

    “14. But above all let us monopolize Education. By this means we spread ideas that are useful to us, and shape the children’s brains as suits us.”

    “15. If one of our people should unhappily fall into the hands of justice amongst the Christians, we must rush to help him; find as many witnesses as he needs to save him from his judges, until we become judges ourselves.”

    “16. The monarchs of the Christian world, swollen with ambition and vanity, surround themselves with luxury and with numerous armies. We shall furnish them with all the money their folly demands, and so shall keep them in leash.”

    “17. Let us take care not to hinder the marriage of our men with Christian girls, for through them we shall get our foot into the most closely locked circles. If our daughters marry Goyim they will be no less useful, for the children of a Jewish mother are ours. Let us foster the idea of free love, that we may destroy among Christian women attachment to the principles and practices of their religion.”

    “18. For ages past the sons of Israel, despised and persecuted, have been working to open up a path to power. They are hitting the mark. They control the economic life of the accursed Christians; their influence preponderates over politics and over manners.”

    “19. At the wished for hour, fixed in advance, we shall let loose the Revolution, which by ruining all classes of Christianity, will definitely enslave the Christian to US. Thus will be accomplished the promise of God made to His people.”

  24. I’ve written extensively on the Protocols and won’t revisit all that now except to simply state that they are the blueprint for the vast conspiracy mounted against mankind whose original documentation was written in 1492 and later revised following the outcome of the American Revolution.

    Ultimately, being in our present human form INFERS being conspired against, as mysterious as that may sound.

    This immense conspiracy is only considered to be theoretical in direct proportion to a lack of knowledge in understanding what human beings truly are in their essence, which in turn addresses the state of devolution we’ve been mired in since time immemorial

      1. Sorry for the delay, Rapparee. As long-time darkmoon readers know, I’ve never been one to offer links. Going through these commentariat archives and reading my voluminous stuff on the subject would be the closest thing to that, I suppose. Not very convenient, though.

        But I have to say, the content of your post sums things up pretty nicely 😀

  25. Brownhawk, Thanks for your reply. When all said and done the most coherent formulation for the vast conspiracy mounted against mankind would be encapsulated in the Babylonian Talmud IMHO. Although, through my more esoteric Spiritual understandings and Christian Gnostic studies which strongly resonate with me, and the concept of the ‘false God’ ie. Jaweh/Jehovah’s usurpation, or as Plato termed it the ‘Demiurge’ and the subsequent forced fall into physicality with loss of knowledge of our truly Divine heritage.
    I fully appreciate and concur with you on your insightful summary, “This immense conspiracy is only considered to be theoretical in direct proportion to a lack of knowledge in understanding what human beings truly are in their essence, which in turn addresses the state of devolution we’ve been mired in since time immemorial.”…indeed!

Comments are closed.