The Tar Baby

By John Kaminski
November 25, 2019

To own a slave is to be a slave

Racial, religious and ethnic supremacists
are always blind to their own faults

. . . liberalism results in rescuing strangers who may one day rise up
and kill you. It keeps you consistent with your abstract moral precepts
but lowers your chances of survival by orders of magnitude . . .

in memory of an honest man
G. Patrick Flanagan
1944-2019

There are opportunists in this world who make us act against our own consciences, immoral people who know that most of us are basically moral, so they play upon our compassion and get us to act contrary to our own best interests.

These are people who urge us to remember our own better natures, yet have no better natures of their own, only a feverish desire within themselves to steal what others own and laugh in the faces of their victims who eventually realize what their misplaced trust has wrought.

So it was in the time of the U.S. Civil War when it was explained to everyone that the Union must be preserved at all costs, and that the evil slavery of the Confederacy was reason to go to war, and for brother to kill brother. What remains mostly unknown, even to this day, was that the force protesting slavery owned more slaves than the Southern plantation owners accused of the practice. The War Between the States was more about keeping the Confederacy a second class region hopelessly indebted to Northern bankers and industrialists than it was about freeing any slaves.

And this is still the way our government treats its own citizens, almost as if some foreign saboteur was running things. Especially as a rationalization for the Civil War, blacks have always been unwitting pawns of the Jews operating from behind the scenes. When you understand who owned the newspapers and wrote the history books, you will understand why you haven’t heard this all before.

Worse still, the Abolitionists who stirred the emotions of the North by stressing the basic unfairness of slavery were cousins of the very people who sold the slaves and maintained the lucrative industry of gathering inhabitants of African jungles and bringing them west for a hefty profit. So when blacks ask for reparations, they should direct their requests to the Jewish bankers who directed the whole operation — they owned the ships and hired the captains — and not from whites, who were victimized by the same scam in a different way (which was the absolute loss of their independence).

Remarkably similar operations have figured prominently in recent years with the Third World invasions of Europe and the United States, though because of their reliance on Jewish media, most people probably never realized that both fabricated “migrations” were conceived and executed by Jewish NGOs (such as the Lutheran church) aiming to further destabilize U.S. society.

They used alcohol to dupe the Africans of old and later used it to swindle and browbeat the Native American tribes into their permanent penal colonies. Bribery, blackmail and murder took care of the rest of the details. All races remain in the same untenable predicament today — screwed by the Jewish financial system, which is soon to be locked into permanence by Jewish AI. This is the quintessential tar baby.

Strength in diversity is a false postulate aimed at diluting and weakening host populations that the Jews want to conquer, subvert and ultimately exterminate.

This idea that people can’t escape the system they are stuck to is the perfect metaphor for the mistaken impression that Americans possess concerning their own Civil War. Originally, “tar baby” was a familiar character in African folklore. It referred to sticky material used to trap a person.

The best known use of the tar baby character was in the Uncle Remus stories by Joel Chandler Harris in the 1880s, in which the character Br’er Fox makes a doll out of tar to ensnare his nemesis Br’er Rabbit. The Oxford American Dictionary defines tar baby much like politician Mitt Romney used it: “a difficult problem that is only aggravated by attempts to solve it.” Merriam-Webster says “something from which it is nearly impossible to extricate oneself.”

Recipe for revolt

Continue . . .

48 thoughts to “The Tar Baby”

  1. Very well articulated by the author. ” When you understand who owned the newspapers and wrote the history books, you will understand why you haven’t heard this all before.”

    This could not be any more thorough when I look at the US foreign policy and the M$M response. Just like in an actual war, whoever side holds air supremacy completely in control of air warfare and air power over opposing forces, they will win the war.

    For instance, if Iran has murdered US citizens and sailors in cold blood like Israel did in in 1967 and 2003, the US media would have been up in arms and Iran would have been bombed to the Stone Age.
    For those who are not old enough, here is when and why ISISrael murdered US citizens:

    1- On June 8, 1967, Israeli air and naval forces suddenly and brutally attacked the USS Liberty, a US naval intelligence ship flying a large Old Glory in international waters on a clear summer day. Thirty-four American sailors were killed in the attack and another 174 were wounded.

    2- In 2003 U.S. citizen and peace activist Rachel Corrie was run down with a bulldozer by an Israeli Occupation soldier while she was attempting to prevent a home demolition. The soldier was never charged with her death.

    In reality, the US should be threatening to bomb the shithole in the Middle East for its sins against America and not bomb harmless and peaceful Muslim countries.

  2. It’s dishonest and even blatantly ignorant to always recuse, make excuses for and downplay the history of the #1 slavers of all time – Islam and Muslims.

    Of course one might have to actually take a Honest look a the 800 years of Islamic invasions and conquests in the name of religion. Even today it continues. But oh well eh, they’re victims now, even as they continue to expand, usurp and out breed their (lol) hosts in the spoken and unspoken goal which is what? Yeah, the same old same old. Conquest and conversion.

    Seems as though the word all the many intellectuals and pipe dreamers are struggling to pronounce and grasp the meaning of is; Duuuuh.

    Let the but, but, but, but, but, but, but, begin!

    1. HP –
      No “but, but, but, but, but, but” about it! Here is some of what I found at the link you shared.

      The Greatest Murder Machine in History
      By Mike Konrad

      When one thinks of mass murder, Hitler comes to mind. If not Hitler, then Tojo, Stalin, or Mao. Credit is given to the 20th-century totalitarians as the worst species of tyranny to have ever arisen. However, the alarming truth is that Islam has killed more than any of these, and may surpass all of them combined in numbers and cruelty.

      The enormity of the slaughters of the “religion of peace” are so far beyond comprehension that even honest historians overlook the scale. When one looks beyond our myopic focus, Islam is the greatest killing machine in the history of mankind, bar none.

      The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. — Will Durant, as quoted on Daniel Pipes site.

      Conservative estimates place the number at 80 million dead Indians.

      According to some calculations, the Indian (subcontinent) population decreased by 80 million between 1000 (conquest of Afghanistan) and 1525 (end of Delhi Sultanate). — Koenrad Elst as quoted on Daniel Pipes site

      Over 110 Million Blacks were killed by Islam.

      … a minumum of 28 Million African were enslaved in the Muslim Middle East. Since, at least, 80 percent of those captured by Muslim slave traders were calculated to have died before reaching the slave market, it is believed that the death toll from 1400 years of Arab and Muslim slave raids into Africa could have been as high as 112 Millions. When added to the number of those sold in the slave markets, the total number of African victims of the trans-Saharan and East African slave trade could be significantly higher than 140 Million people. — John Allembillah Azumah, author of The Legacy of Arab-Islam in Africa: A Quest for Inter-religious Dialogue

      Add just those two numbers alone together, and Islam has surpassed the victims of 20th-century totalitarianism. However, it does not end there. Add the millions who died at the hand of Muslims in the Sudan in our lifetime.

      Much of Islamic slavery was sexual in nature, with a preference for women. Those men who were captured were castrated. The mulatto children of the women were often killed, which explains why Islam was not demographically shifted towards the black race, unlike slaves in the West, who bore children to breed a mestizo class. Add in those dead children; and we arrive at well over 200 million.

      Remember that in the 7th century, North Africa was almost totally Christian. What happened to them?

      By the year 750, a hundred years after the conquest of Jerusalem, at least 50 percent of the world’s Christians found themselves under Muslim hegemony… Today there is no indigenous Christianity in the region [of Northwest Africa], no communities of Christians whose history can be traced to antiquity.– “Christianity Face to Face with Islam,” CERC

      What happened to those Christian millions? Some converted. The rest? Lost to history.

      We know that over 1 million Europeans were enslaved by Barbary Pirates. How many died is anybody’s guess.

      …for the 250 years between 1530 and 1780, the figure could easily have been as high as 1,250,000 – BBC

      In the Middle Ages…

      …many slaves were passed through Armenia and were castrated there to fill the Muslim demand for eunuchs. — Slavery in Early Medieval Europe.
      The same practice ran through Islamic Spain. North Europeans captured from raids up to Iceland, or purchased, were butchered in the castratoriums of Iberia. Many died from the operations that ran for centuries.

      The number of dead from the Muslim conquest of the Balkans and Southern Italy is unknown, but again the numbers add up, surely into the millions over the centuries. Don’t forget the 1.5 million Armenian Christians killed by the Turks during WWI. We do know that over five centuries, vast numbers of Christian boys were kidnapped to become Islamic Janissary mercenaries for the Turks. Add those in, too.

      Muslims prized blonde women for their harems; and so enslaved Slavic women were purchased in the bazaars of the Crimean Caliphate. In Muslim Spain, an annual tribute of 100 Visigothic [blonde] women was required from Spain’s Cantabrian coast.

      For decades, 100 virgins per year were required by the Muslim rulers of Spain from the conquered population. The tribute was only stopped when the Spaniards began fighting back — Jihad: Islam’s 1,300 Year War Against Western Civilisation.

      Research has shown that the Dark Ages were not caused by the Goths, who eventually assimilated and Christianized:

      …the real destroyers of classical civilization were the Muslims. It was the Arab Invasions… which broke the unity of the Mediterranean world and turned the Middle Sea — previously one of the world’s most important trading highways — into a battleground. It was only after the appearance of Islam… that the cities of the West, which depended upon the Mediterranean trade for their survival, began to die. — Islam Caused the Dark Ages

      Now consider the over 125 Million women today who have been genitally mutilated for Islamic honor’s sake. In spite of what apologists tell you, the practice is almost totally confined to Islamic areas.

      New information from Iraqi Kurdistan raises the possibility that the problem is more prevalent in the Middle East than previously believed and that FGM is far more tied to religion than many Western academics and activists admit. – “Is Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) an Islamic Problem?” ME Quarterly

      Once thought concentrated in Africa, FGM has now been discovered to be common wherever Islam is found.

      There are indications that FGM might be a phenomenon of epidemic proportions in the Arab Middle East. Hosken, for instance, notes that traditionally all women in the Persian Gulf region were mutilated. Arab governments refuse to address the problem. — “Is Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) an Islamic Problem?” (ME Quarterly)

      FGM is practiced on large scale in Islamic Indonesia; and is INCREASING!!

      …far from scaling down, the problem of FGM in Indonesia has escalated sharply. The mass ceremonies in Bandung have grown bigger and more popular every year. — Guardian

      The horrified British author of that Guardian article is still deluded that Islam does not support FGM, when in fact it is now settled that FGM is a core Islamic practice. Islamic women have been brainwashed to support their own abuse.

      Abu Sahlieh further cited Muhammad as saying, “Circumcision is a sunna (tradition) for the men and makruma (honorable deed) for the women.” — “Is Female Genital Mutilation an Islamic Problem?” (ME Quarterly)

      What other tyranny does this?

      Other tyrannies are furious infections, which burn hot, but are soon overcome. Islam is a slow terminal cancer, which metastasizes, and takes over. It never retreats. Its methods are more insidious, often imperceptible at first, driven by demographics. Like cancer, excision may be the only cure.

      So whenever you read about this or that Israeli outrage — and there may be truth to the complaint — place the news in context. Look whom the Israelis are fighting against…..
      ….. Islam is like nothing else in history!

      Mike Konrad is the pen name of an American who is not Jewish, Latin, or Arab. He runs a website, http://latinarabia.com, where he discusses the subculture of Arabs in Latin America. He wishes his Spanish were better.

      When one thinks of mass murder, Hitler comes to mind. If not Hitler, then Tojo, Stalin, or Mao. Credit is given to the 20th-century totalitarians as the worst species of tyranny to have ever arisen. However, the alarming truth is that Islam has killed more than any of these, and may surpass all of them combined in numbers and cruelty.

      The enormity of the slaughters of the “religion of peace” are so far beyond comprehension that even honest historians overlook the scale.
      When one looks beyond our myopic focus, Islam is the greatest killing machine in the history of mankind, bar none.

      The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. — Will Durant, as quoted on Daniel Pipes site. Conservative estimates place the number at 80 million dead Indians.

      The ruthlessness of muslim invaders continued for a thousand years:
      http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/32812

      According to some calculations, the Indian (subcontinent) population decreased by 80 million between 1000 (conquest of Afghanistan) and 1525 (end of Delhi Sultanate). — Koenrad Elst as quoted on Daniel Pipes site.

      Over 110 Million Blacks were killed by Islam.

      … a minumum of 28 Million African were enslaved in the Muslim Middle East. Since, at least, 80 percent of those captured by Muslim slave traders were calculated to have died before reaching the slave market, it is believed that the death toll from 1400 years of Arab and Muslim slave raids into Africa could have been as high as 112 Millions. When added to the number of those sold in the slave markets, the total number of African victims of the trans-Saharan and East African slave trade could be significantly higher than 140 Million people. — John Allembillah Azumah, author of The Legacy of Arab-Islam in Africa: A Quest for Inter-religious Dialogue

      Add just those two numbers alone together, and Islam has surpassed the victims of 20th-century totalitarianism. However, it does not end there. Add the millions who died at the hand of Muslims in the Sudan in our lifetime.

      Much of Islamic slavery was sexual in nature, with a preference for women. Those men who were captured were castrated. The mulatto children of the women were often killed, which explains why Islam was not demographically shifted towards the black race, unlike slaves in the West, who bore children to breed a mestizo class. Add in those dead children; and we arrive at well over 200 million.

      https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/05/the_greatest_murder_machine_in_history.html#ixzz66V4Syvst

      1. Firstly, I am grateful to the administration who allows me to post here, thank you and may God bless you.
        Pat,
        From your post:
        …110,000,000 Africans KILLED, a little later….significantly HIGHER THAN 140,000,000; then a little later on in the piece it jumped to WELL OVER 200,000,000, and they’re not killed by Arabs or Muslims. Lo and behold! they’re killed by ISLAM.
        ……
        To explain away the absolute lack of physical evidence of almost ANY population of Black Africans in the ME, he gets creative: 80 percent were killed on route. It’s not like they’re crossing the Atlantic. And, yeah, the ones crossing the Atlantic for months in decay, death and feces ought to be so thankful; yeah! yippie! They’re off to the land of milk and honey.

        If you look throughout the ME you will not find any significant populations of Black Africans, not in Arabia, not in Yemen, not in Iraq, not in Iran, not in Syria, , not in Palestine, not in Jordan not even in Egypt. Then comes the lusty part, they were after the African beauties to indulge their insatiable appetite for sex. To bother continuing on this, is simply too absurd.

        It reminds me of the 6,000,000 number and how it started out small, then magically over the years just sort of appeared as a permanent stamp.

        He then goes on to claim that research has shown that the dark ages were CAUSED BY ISLAM.

        Wow! It used to be Muslims worshipped the Moon God, or Saturn, or the Black stone or the Cube or Mahomet. Even today you have a hard time typing Muslim – you may make whatever excuse you want. We’re all heading back to God soon, at least have some small measure of integrity man.

        I have a degree in Computer Science, a second degree in Mathematics and a minor in Anthropology. I am saying this because I remember in one of my 4th year Math courses the whole course was on how the modern age would not be possible without the Arabic number system. It is not material so much that the Muslims learned the zero from the Indians, that is true but they developed the number system and they carried it throughout their world.

        In the Math course I was taught that Bassnio of Piso, who grew up in North Africa among the Muslims eventually was instrumental in taking this to Europe. The course was taught by a proper White man, in a time when there were very few Brown or Black folks in my city.

        So according to your expert, there is no Ibn Al Haytham, the first man to clearly elucidate and prove that light does not emanate from the eye but only reflected. It is through his detailed experiments that the camera obscura was born. However, more importantly, it was through his detailed experiments and drawings that he developed the scientific method.

        What about the great chemist Razi, who formulated a rudimentary periodic table, or the great mathematician Muhammad ibin Musa Al Khawarsimi, from where we get the word algorithm; the master of quadratics or even Omar Khayyam, one of the first to use irrational numbers in equations; not to speak of Al Jaber from where we get the word Algebra. I can go on and on and on in every field of learning.

        Did Michael Angelo also get it wrong when he painted that guy in the corner with a turban, the brilliant physician and philosopher Averroes (Ibn Rushd), whose school of philosophy popped up in many parts of Europe for generations after him?

        How about Al Biruni who calculated the circumference of the Earth to a remarkable degree of accuracy?
        I’m surprised the ‘expert’ did not include the sinister plot of Muslims to bring sugar to the world and thus start the type 2 diabetes epidemic these days. I hope you recognize sugar is an Arabic word.

        I am by no means suggesting that there was no slavery in the Arab/Muslim world. Slavery was also prevalent in Hindu societies, Roman societies, Chinese societies, Christian societies and Hebrew societies among others.

        Let us see what the Qur’an says:
        “Those who cannot afford to get married shall maintain morality until God provides for them from His grace. Those among your servants who wish to be freed in order to marry, you shall grant them their wish, once you realize that they are trustworthy. And give them from God’s money(wealth) that He has bestowed upon you. ………” (Q 24:33)

        Charities shall go to the poor, the needy, the workers who collect them, the new converts, to free slaves, to those burdened by sudden expenses, in the cause of God, and to the traveling alien. Such is God’s commandment. God is All-Knowing, Most Wise. (Q 9:60)

        “Righteousness is not turning your faces towards the east or the west. Righteousness is believing in God, the Last Day, the angels, the scripture, and the prophets; and to give money/charity, cheerfully, to relatives, to orphans, the needy, the traveling alien, the beggars, and to free slaves; and to observe the Prayers (Salat) and to give the obligatory charity (Zakat); and to keep your word whenever you make a promise; and steadfastly persevere in the face of persecution, hardship, and war. These are the truthful; these are the righteous.” (Q 2:177)

        Did we not show him the two paths? He should choose the difficult one. And what is the difficult path? It is the freeing of slaves. (Q 90:10-13)

        Of course slavery is an awful thing and many have asked why did the Qur’an not abolish it categorically. From the above verses it is clear that the Qur’an strongly encourages freeing of slaves. Additionally, it makes it mandatory on the owner to free the slave who wishes to be freed and is trustworthy.

        In my opinion, one has to try to imagine the environment in which the Qur’an was revealed, a very poor, unsophisticated tribal society of the 7th Century. In Islam the only time someone can be enslaved is in the time of war. At that time there were no penitentiaries, no sophisticated buildings, not to mentions feeding inmates etc.

        Instead of killing the captives, you can ransom them or trade with the other side or enslave them. The enslavement should not be seen as a permanent condition but they have to live some time in that condition until they can prove their trustworthiness.
        Obviously in modern times things have changed considerably and slavery is not acceptable at all.
        I could respond to every one of the accusations but this is already too long.

        I do want to say however, that I did not mean to offend anyone intentionally, my observations are what my heart guided me to. Personally, I have benefited greatly from Thomas Jefferson and I am very Jeffersonian in thought, to the point my wife gets upset with me. Like John Locke and Issac Newton, he believed in God and was staunchly Unitarian in belief, and I am too.

        “God has given you all you have asked for; and were you to attempt to add up the kindnesses of God, you would fall short. Indeed humanity is prey to injustice and ingratitude.” (Q 14:34)

        “…Whatever of good you spend in charity shall be for your own souls and you should not spend except out of longing for the face of God.” (Q 2:272)
        Salaam/Shalom/Peace

      2. Seeb –

        Thanks for the reply! I respect your opinion.

        Most of the points I knew – especially the roots of ALGEBRA. I did not know about the painting by Michael Angelo…. and still do not know the reason the turbans were placed there.

        There have been many intelligent murderers throughout history. That includes the musselmen – as Jefferson noted – of Africa’s northern coast. The Barbary coast in particular.

        The goal of islam is to convert the world to that religion. Infidels are to be eliminated. That does not work for me.

      3. @ Pat, you brag about being a devout Christian, but you lie about Islam with each breath you take. In fact you spew lies and spread falsehood about Islam on this site on a daily basis like slot machines spit out nickels. Keep it up, Miss Knows it all!

      4. MEY –

        “DEVOUT CHRISTIAN”!!?? 🙂 🙂

        You have not paid very close attention my posts!! Not one bit!!

        I am not a devout Christian at all. I doubt the existence of Jesus of Nazareth. Everyone here but you knows that. You now have zero credibility when commenting about me. 🙂 🙂

    2. Pat, please refrain from telling lies and false hood about Isalm on this site.

      You said, ” The goal of islam is to convert the world to that religion. Infidels are to be eliminated. That does not work for me.”
      First of all, the Quran said, لاَ إِكْرَاهَ فِي الدِّينِ (There is no compulsion in religion), meaning, “Do not force anyone to become Muslim, for Islam is plain and clear, and its proofs and evidence are plain and clear. Therefore, there is no need to force anyone to embrace Islam.

      Since Arabic is my native tongue, I feel I should clear up the misconceptions and misunderstandings about your usage of the term “infidel.” as well as the word “Allah.”

      Myth # 1: Infidel does not mean “Westerner” or a “non Muslim”. The term refers to disbeliever, people who do not believe in God. It is also mentioned in the Bible and it means the same in Arabic.

      Myth # 2: People who think using the term is a clever way to insult Muslims are in fact making fools of themselves by declaring themselves to be atheists and enemies of their own God.

      Christians and Jews are referred to in the Quran as “people of the book” and are respected branches of Abrahamic religions. This means they all worship the God of Abraham.

      Myth # 3: Muslims worship only God that they refer to in Arabic as Allah. Because of language differences, God is referred to by different names, but they are one and the same. In German, God is called Gott and Jews call him Yahweh. I should note here that Jews and Christians living in Arabia use the Arabic phrase “Allah” when referring to God.

      PRIOR TO ISLAM, Christians used the term “INFIDELS” to describe unbelievers and enemies of God. Once again, the name God is Allah in Arabic and Yahweh in Hebrew. Next time someone pokes fun of the name “Allah” or misuses the term “infidels”, remember, don’t be a fool, Allah means God and infidel means unbeliever.

      1. MEY –
        I shall be glad to refrain from telling lies. 🙂

        This is No lie…..
        Muslims attack Mall Christmas tree!!

        The mainstream news doesn’t air this, but people need to see it.
        This is an example of the SO VERY TOLERANT religion of peace assimilating into western culture!!??

        Why is this not a hate crime?

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybl6H-5xGGA

  3. After all considerations and fact-finding of historic events or non-events, it becomes obvious that “identity” politics has extreme validity. Ergo, it is good strategy to initially distrust anyone of different ethnicity, and only common sense to protect national and familial boundaries from invasion. If being a Jew automatically inspires suspicion of motive, why not oppose them in the first place?? If being a negro in these United States makes one a pawn for those Jews, why not be initially “prejudiced” against them? If being a middle-easterner lends to the likelihood of being “radically” Islamist, why entertain their presence in our American legislatures?? Ultimately, we who complain have only ourselves to blame. While we could do something about it, we didn’t. While we still have some firepower, we don’t use it, and readily and loudly condemn those who do so.
    WTF are we thinking??! (Too much “we” and not enough “me” identifies a coward…)

  4. Gilbert, what happened is the Abrahamaniacs (three burrs on a mule’s tail) have usurped the Faith and the miscreants controlling this earth these last few thousand years $hot a quantum bolt of B.S. so powerful it shredded the fabric of History. From the wreckage appeared Bizarro History and Non-History. Helluva feat!

    Just an opinion, an observation as honest as my insufficiencies allow.

  5. It is my opinion that slavery was the best thing that every happened to the African slaves. I am an African American. I can see the positive nature of African Slavery. The African slaves who survived the voyage to America were the creme de la creme. African slaves upon arrival had their basic needs for survival: food, water, and shelter prepared for them. Wealthy people eagerly paid money for the basic needs of the African slaves: sustained sources of food, water, and shelter.

    European immigrants didn’t have money thrown at them to ensure their survival in America. European immigrants endured 200 years of abject poverty because of slavery.

    African slaves monopolized the job market in America. The wealthy (Jews) were sugar daddies for the African slaves.

      1. Do you really expect anyone to fall for your poppycock theory that African slaves had an easier life in America than the Whites who worked them to death?

      2. @ Tina

        If African slavery was such a blessing for black people, as you make out, you would presumably have been against the abolition of slavery. Correct?

        In which case, you would now br a slave yourself. Correct?

        Would you like that?

      3. You don’t know crap about how those slaves were treated, Ruth. For the most part, they were well-treated, and many were revered like “family”. Growing up, my own family maintained the help of descendants of those African slaves – and they were loved and cared for as much or more than some of our own blood. The idea of an “Uncle Remus” is NOT far-fetched, and those exist in many places in the American South. Before “de-segregation” there were relatively few angry divisions among us. People like you – “outsiders” – stuck your damn noses in our business. (Are you sure YOU are not a “Jew agent”??)

      4. ADMIN TOBY: Your comment to Gilbert Huntly has been deleted. GH said nothing to merit such a hissy fit on your part. Please exercise more control over your tongue in future.

      5. “Dr.” Parker –

        I see you are just another of low-class trash who are pea-green with envy of your betters. You’re obviously not an M.D., and you hate that circumstance so much that you preface your name with innuendo.

      6. @ Gilbert Huntly

        Re Dr Parker,

        I commend you for the restraint you have shown in dealing with this out-of-control commenter. His language describing you as a “racist C**T (and other potty-mouthed language used in his diatribe) is totally unacceptable to us. I have therefore decided to delete both his comments to teach him a lesson in good manners.

      7. Thank you, Toby. 🙂
        I remember your having chastised ME awhile back, and I therefore am trying to be conscious of not indulging my poor manners at your table! Your darling niece happened to take note, and asked you to reinstate my ability to comment. (I missed y’all!)

      8. @ Gilbert Huntly

        Pay no attention if I “chastise” you at any time in the future. This is not meant personally but could be a misunderstanding on my part. Or it could be a need on my part to make you understand that the Darkmoon site is modelling itself on academically respectable sites like the Occidental Observer (which it admittedly fails to do) and NOT on sites like Incogman where the N-word is frequently used.

        Lasha herself deplores the use of the N-word. She couldn’t possibly entertain dinner guests at her house if they kept using words like n***er and c**n and k**e (not to mention words like f**k and c**t) while they were slurping down the soup! There are certain standards, Gilbert, that simply have to be observed.

        You yourself state that your ancestors would have treated their black slaves very nicely. Also your black servants. I believe that. You are not an exception. The better class of Americans would never dream of mistreating their slaves or servants by calling them “dirty n***ers” to their faces. Why go out of your way to humiliate and bully your fellowman? I do not believe for a moment that the Cosmic Christ (as opposed to the so called “historical” Jesus) died for the White Man only. The black man, however, finds it hard to worship a White Christ and so he may choose to imagine a black Christ to make his worship easier. I think that’s OK.

        I know what I’m saying is too complex for discussion here in a brief comment, so let’s just say it’s best to err on the side of verbal restraint and good manners. Remember Christ’s dictum: “Be as wise as serpents but harmless as doves.”

      9. @ Dr. PARKER, I value your recent deleted comment and courage. Pat message is clear. To stigmatize Muslims and force them into silence. It is the same message when a McCain supporter claimed during the presidential election, that a “black Obama supporter” assaulted her and wrote “b*tch” on her face. It turned out to be a hoax then.

        Still though, Pat has a sharp mind and very talented. It is sad and shameful that she misuses that gift.

  6. @ Ruth, Well they certainly had a far easier time than poor whites in england of the time ever had,
    they didn’t have thier children forced to work down mines, or in those “satanic mills” nor forced up chimneys often when there was a fire going! nor pressed into vitual slavery in the navy
    they didn’t have to collect piss to survive, or have thier daughters to sell themselves on the streets of every major city
    I could go on……..
    now pit that against wandering up and down a field with a bag on your back picking off the lovely fluffy cotton buds and putting them in that bag,
    that once even stuffed full would weigh next to nothing!
    I know what kind of slave I would rather have been given the choice,
    “400 years of slavery” gimmee a break!!

    1. @ Teejay

      You paint an idyllic picture of black slaves living a happy lazy life in a sunny earthly paradise. Good for you! As opposed to this, you juxtapose a grim picture of “dark satanic mills” and chimney sweeps dying of lung cancer in “England’s green and pleasant land.” I can’t help feeling there is something casuistic about your “cotton-pickin'” logic! But I can’t put my finger on it right now . . . 🙂

      Tell me, would you rather be a poor peasant in medieval England than a rich man living in a palace? — just because you heard of one peasant girl living a long and happy life washing dishes in the palace kitchen? and one prince going blind and paralysed in the same palace from developing cataracts in old age and getting general paralysis of the insane from contracting syphilis in a local brothel?

      Generalizing from particular instances is not advised. All dogs are not vicious killers just because some dogs turn out really vicious or get rabies.

  7. DR, cough cough, Parker,
    Let’s view things from a logical scope. A slave was an investment. They were not mistreated. It was much more in the slaveholders interest to care for him or her. In the South slaves were very well taken care of. It was business. If a cruel redneck Southerner wanted a good harvest, he had to take care of the labor. That simple. No different than changing the oil in your car every 3000 miles. Gilb is 100 per cent in his assessment. On a different note, ALL Americans are slaves nowadays. We pay exorbant taxes and even the health care ain’t free. The African slaves of the old South actually cared better than American tax payers today.

    1. You are probably right on your assertion, Donaldo!

      But that’s not the whole picture, what about the disobedient slaves, they were well treated too? Of course not, they were severely punished, until crack down. One of the most notorious slave-breaker was Eduard Covey, a poor white farmer of Maryland. He exchanged his services for free labor in his farm, rebel slaves were sent to his farm for correction.

      It’s interesting to note how difficult is to completely dominate the human species by force. There will always be those who refuse to submit their heart, a nightmare for the PTB.

      Don’t matter how much they try, they can’t farm us. 🙂

  8. There truly is no hope for mankind.
    Slavery (of ones own thick-headed opinion) seem to be the only liberty and freedom that a dreamlike existence in purgatory has to offer. Give man divinity and he will design it into the opposite. Present man with life and he will abuse it into death. Gift him Love and he insults it into hate on order of mighty self delusion and superiority. Show man his own reality and origin and he organizes superior madness, chaos and rises above all else in a fake grandeur. Perfection will be turned to imperfection with a single human touch and freedom is dragged into slavery in a simple human thought. Unity, harmony and a caring family is partitioned, regulated and split into tiny fragments of useless slime while ALL desires behind ones own opinion long for what can not be accomplished alone. The untouchable and toxic but proud tribe in its lowest form of castes created imperfection in its own image descending from self glorification to self destruction instantly while blaming all but oneself. The victim of ones own deceit is all but innocent in his own crime of self fraudulence. There truly is no hope for the “enslaved” master of mankind!

    “All those who pretend to have the magic formula are really enemies of God and the cause of all strife in the world”. John Kaminski

  9. I agree that being a “slave” under ANY circumstances is not a desireable state of affairs. However, in the circumstance of time and place, it might have been more desireable here, in America, than having been conquered and killed in Africa, or sold into some Arab’s possession in Babylon. While sexual abuse in captivity DID happen, it was not a usual circumstance. The offspring of such unions were usually house servants, or promoted to favored mistresses by their keepers. (Thomas Jefferson’s Sally comes to mind). (Hers and TJs descendants now reside at the old Dabney Carr farm in Keswick, and I have been a guest, there, at hunts.) (The house resembles Monticello.)
    People’s society evolves, but our prejudices are more slow to dissipate. Caution needs be exercised, and awareness can only be maintained by voice and word. Being called “racist” or “redneck” is small potatoes, as far as I am concerned…

    1. Please excuse me. Thomas Jefferson’s wife, Martha, was a Carr. Dabney, her father, was a Virginia Supreme Court justice, and TJ designed the house for HIM. HIS descendants (Martha’s kin) still reside there. Sally Hemmings was Martha’s handmaiden, but became Jefferson’s mistress after Martha died. Sally’s remains are buried at Monticello, too.

  10. While on the subject, I would like to remind everyone that a certain Jew named “Uriah Levy” bought Monticello from Jefferson’s indebted estate in the 1830s, and was the one responsible for refurbishing it to new life. Commodore Levy was a great admirer of Jefferson. Mr. Levy died in the early 1860s, and his caretaker, one “Joel Wheeler” resided there for a few decades and left it in disrepair. “Commodore” Levy’s nephew, Jefferson Levy, retrieved it and restored it. He allowed anyone a pilgrimage to the front door, and departed this life in 1923. I can’t recall, but either The Commonwealth of Virginia or UVa. purchased it via “The Thomas Jefferson Foundation” and it is now the “most visited house” in the United States (@$25/per ticket).
    It is my understanding that Mr. Levy was VERY generous to those who wished to visit TJ’s Monticello, and but for this Jew, we would NOT have had the privilege of visiting this great estate. (One of his descendants is a good friend of mine.)

    1. I have been to Monticello several times. One day does it no justice.

      I was impressed with TJ’s designs & inventions….. and really impressed with the kitchen & its location! 🙂

      1. Paul Harvey used to delight us decades ago with the rest of his story’s segments on ABC News radio. However, commenter Pat on this site goes through pain to insult Muslims and discredit Palestinians. What a shame!

  11. For those interested for some perspective of this subject TJ recommends a reading of Keith Richburg’s “Out of Africa”. Remember, the Democrats before the Northern invasion of the South were the conservatives: true believers of the US Constitution, states rights who knew that Slavery would be gone by at least the 1880’s. Only about 4.7% of the Southerners owned slavers at about less then 10 slaves each on average. On the other hand the Republican ruled North under Lincoln were the Liberals and Marxist commies . The rolls are mostly reversed today. In the antebellum South there were Blacks, American Indians and Mexicans slave holders, some of them white indentured servants who were treated far worse then the Black slaves because they were not in the legal sense “property”. Now, don’t spread this around to much in that you might hurt the tender feelings of American snowflake University history professors, their cupcake students, and the general masses of American air-heads— that the very first Black slave holder in the colonies was Anthony Johnson.
    “Anthony Johnson (b. c. 1600 – d. 1670) was a black Angolan known for achieving freedom and wealth in the early 17th-century Colony of Virginia.He was one of the first African American property owners and had his right to legally own a slave recognized by the Virginia courts.”

    “Nothing in Keith Richburg’s long and respected journalistic career at the Washington Post prepared him for what he would encounter as the paper’s correspondent in Africa. He found a continent where brutal murder had become routine, where dictators and warlords silenced dissent with machine guns and machetes, and where starvation had become depressingly common. With a great deal of personal anguish, Richburg faced a difficult question: If this is Africa, what does it mean to be an African American?

    In this provocative and unvarnished account of his three years on the continent of his ancestors, Richburg takes us on a extraordinary journey that sweeps from Somalia to South Africa, showing how he confronted the divide between his African racial heritage and his American cultural identity.”
    https://www.amazon.com/Out-America-Keith-B-Richburg/dp/0465001882

  12. GH
    I wonder who Jefferson owed all the money to?
    TINA
    You’re not as wrong as some would like to paint it…
    Life in Africa under the various warring kings was no picnic for the black villagers..
    A huge percentage of the blacks brought to america as slaves were prisoners of war, often with wounds…
    If not for the slave traders, they would have been put to death by their captors…
    many black parents sold their daughters for a block of salt and a yard of cloth……
    cloth was the number one item of value for trade on black african human beings…
    it was a common practice that villagers would raid other villages and kidnap and sell their fellows into slavery…
    blacks on the african slave coast lived in a climate of fear of each other, much the same as they do now in the black areas of american cities, chicago and saint louis, where the democratic party, still the party of slavery, has held power for many decades…
    and for what it’s worth, blacks were favored on the sugar and cotton plantations, as compared to native americans, not just because of their greater strength, but also for their generally more agreeable dispositions…
    As secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz once joked – “all black people in america want is a tight pussy, a full bowl of gritz and a warm place to shit”…
    PAT
    That was a great little essay, so true…
    The real nature of any religio-political demographic will be revealed in its history…
    Which one’s best?
    None of the above…
    while there’s no doubt abut it – black slaves were expensive investments, one would think, not to be worked to death in a short while, in fact that’s exactly what happened to most of them…
    that doesn’t mean they were many among the tens of thousands who died draining the swamps an digging the panama canal… That white privilege was reserved largely for penniless irish immigrants…

    1. Barkingdeer –

      My granddaddy always told me “When your outgo exceeds your income, then your upkeep is your downfall.”
      It doesn’t matter to whom ol’ TJ was indebted. His “outgo” exceeded his “income.” (I’m glad it did, otherwise we wouldn’t be enjoying the beauty of Monticello.) 😉

  13. ADMIN: BARKINGDEER, Please use your original user NAME in future, not your initials. You are giving Admin extra work by chopping and changing your user names.

    GH
    I’m thinking the same jewish bankers who had him assassinated..

    1. @ barkingdeer

      Let me know if you want to change your name to your initials. No problem. If I were you, however, I’d stick to “Barkingdeer” which is quite a nice name and gives you more distinction.

  14. I reject completely the Jewish phony concept of historical debt. Jews love debt on others don’t they? Especially the kind of debt that is impossible to be paid off. How can a society or a race pay a historical debt? It can’t, not on Jewish terms. Historical debt, or collective punishment, cannot coexist with the philosophical concept of true justice. We supposed to be born debt free.

    These are the main cases of the phony concept in practice: the forever historical debt the white men have with blacks and the forever historical debt the Germans (white Germans) have with Jews.

    The assimilation of this principle has devastating consequences on the personal level too, the psychological pathology of white guilt, which leads to low self-esteem and depression. Some whites can’t interact with blacks without kowtowing to them. In the same way, some white Germans can’t interact with Jews without kowtowing to them. White guilt is so sad!

    On the other hand non slave blacks are being taught to hate non slave owner whites, and not only that, they want to collect the debt with “affirmative actions.” Oh, how I hate these commie jargons that we must take as universal trues. The ridiculous and suicidal quotas are not enough anymore, blacks are so tricked with slavery propaganda that they want the whites to bleed. The only option for whites to pay the bogus historical debt is to drop dead.

    “The limits of my world are the limits of my language” – a great quote from the British philosopher. Commies like to subvert the language, if you use their language you lose the argument. In this particular case, the word brown (mulato) has simply disappeared, it has no meaning anymore; in the commie dictionary brown and black are synonymous. Browns are a mixture of whites and blacks, that said how can a brown hate whites if he is half white? He hates one of his own parents or a family branch?! This was done to push browns to the other side of the fence, which is just absurd.

    Another manipulative technique is to separate blacks from their country, no common allegiance to the motherland, which is their home, or a common flag, the national flag. According to leftists blacks in the US are not Americans they are essentially Africans, even if, culturally, they are far from being an African. “African-americans” don’t know anything about Africa, they couldn’t stand it. In Africa they don’t collect the garbage on the streets, what can be more un-American? It’s all a bad joke; the Jewish propaganda machine is raising American blacks to be an inassimilable pariah.

  15. ” In Islam the only time someone can be enslaved is in the time of war. ”

    Islam is in a permanent state of war against infidels; jihad.

  16. ADMIN/ Sister Monica, is Darkmoon having a Deletion Day special today? Please next time tell us why the comment was deleted, so no one repeats the same mistake over or was her/his time wasted. My last deleted comment was simply praising DR PARKER for his input and courage. There was no reference to the Star of Darkmoon or anyone else. I am writing this just a friendly reminder.

    1. @ Mahmoud El-Yousseph

      I don’t think you understand how WordPress works. If you refer to a poster who is banned, a person in Spamblinka, your comment will go into SPAM automatically and will not be seen or posted. If you refer to “TheRealOriginalJoe” by name, your comment will go into Spam automatically. You would therefore be wrong to blame Admin for “deleting” your comment. You have deleted your own comment by referring to ‘TheRealOriginalJoe” by name. Refer to him as “TROJ” and you will have no problem.

      Same with “Dr Parker”. He is also, I believe, a resident of Spamblinka. So if you refer to him by name thus [@ Dr Parker], your comment will SELF-DELETE or go into Spam where it’s unlikely to be seen or read. Understand?

      Dr Parker’s comment was justly deleted by Admin because he used the filthiest and most abusive language, referring to Pat as “a disgusting f***ing C**T. (At least, I think he did, if my memory serves me right).

      1. @ Sardonicus, thank you old buddy. I stand corrected. You are quite right, I have no clue how the Word Press works. Anway, thanks for taking the time to explain how that works. I was really flapper guested at first and was contemplating to post less.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *