Why Americans are breaking their silence on Israel

By Robert Fisk
Originally published on The Independent

January 28, 2019  “Information Clearing House” — Most folk outside the United States – and until this month, most Americans – won’t have heard of Michelle Alexander. She’s a civil rights lawyer and academic and has written a book called The New Jim Crow, and a few months ago The New York Times took her on as a regular columnist. Like millions of black – and white – Americans, she’s a devotee of Martin Luther King Jr.

And last week, she began her op-ed in the Old Gray Lady of record and one-time conservatism with a long and admiring tribute to the black, Christian, nonviolent civil rights campaigner who, just a year before his 1968 assassination, decided he must speak out about the disaster of the Vietnam war.

He had been told to soft-pedal the conflict which had by then cost the lives of 10,000 Americans, but which was still supported by the political establishment. So even though he would be falsely accused of being a communist, he chose to break his silence.

So far, so good. But last week, Alexander chose to “break” her own silence. Not about racism in the US or about second-class citizenship or Trump, but about the Palestinians.


For not only did she reiterate King’s belief that Israel must return parts of its then newly conquered territories – East Jerusalem, the West Bank, Gaza and Golan – but she launched into a long, eloquent, rather patronising, self-indulgent but courageous condemnation of Israel’s outrageous treatment of the Palestinians.

Like King, she had been silent on “one of the great moral challenges of our time” – along with the US congress, civil rights activists and students – but further silence on Israel and the Palestinians, she decided, would be “betrayal”.

If they had been wise, Israel’s friends, supporters and lobbyists in America might have held their peace. After the election of Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar to congress – both supporting the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign against Israel – the state’s comrades-in-arms might have dismissed Alexander as a parvenu, a hitherto respected scholar who had tried to advance her social status by adopting the Palestinian cause in King’s shadow with neither the knowledge nor political support to sustain her. But no.

The sky fell.

She was “vicious” in her views, wrong on facts, potentially antisemitic, a “strategic threat” to Israel itself. Her article was “dangerously flawed”, an “error-ridden rant” that ignored Palestinian violence and terrorism. It was a sign of just how shaken Israel’s friends have become in an America that is breaking the old taboo on US-Israeli relations and Washington’s permanent acquiescence in Israel’s illegal colonisation of Arab land that even that old artillery-piece Alan Dershowitz was trundled out onto his Harvard battlements to take aim at “one of the most biased, poorly informed and historically inaccurate columns about the conflict between Israel and Palestine ever published by a mainstream newspaper”.


Like one of those magnificent iron cannons which tourists are expected to admire on ancient fortress walls, Dershowitz hurled forth barrage after barrage at Alexander. She condemned the bulldozing of Palestinian homes “without mentioning that these are the homes of terrorists who murder Jewish children, women, and men”. She bemoaned casualties in Gaza “without mentioning that many of these casualties were human shields from behind whom Hamas terrorists fire rockets at Israeli civilians”.

But this sort of gunfire is now regarded as so inaccurate that Americans – especially in the Democratic Party – are beginning to ask themselves just what is really going on in Israel and the occupied Palestinians lands.

Not once in his own rant did Dershowitz mention the massive Israeli Jewish colonisation project which is stealing land from Arab Palestinians for Jews and Jews only on the West Bank.

Is the boycott and divestment campaign against Israel which Alexander supports – along with congresswomen Tlaib and Omar – really “delegitimising” Israel, as her critics claim? Or is Israel delegitimising itself by confiscating land which does not belong to it?

The real reason for all the battlefield smoke, of course, has less to do with Alexander’s robust if occasionally cringe-making assault on Israeli injustice towards Palestinians as it does her scholarly background as a black civil rights worker who might understand what injustice really means, and the dangerous fissures appearing within the Democratic Party over America’s automatic, uncritical, all-appeasing and fearful support for Israel.

It’s easy to accuse a white American of being an antisemite for “breaking the silence” over US-Israeli shenanigans; quite another to condemn a black American without giving the impression that such condemnation is not itself racist.

And just read what Alexander actually wrote.  If the US is to honour King’s message and not merely the man, she insisted:

“We must condemn Israel’s actions: unrelenting violations of international law, continued occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza, home demolitions and land confiscations. We must cry out at the treatment of Palestinians at checkpoints, the routine searches of their homes and restrictions on their movements.”

Americans should question “the US government funds that have supported multiple hostilities and thousands of civilian casualties in Gaza, as well as the $38bn the US government has pledged in military support to Israel”.

There are the usual mistakes, of course. Gaza is – technically – no longer “occupied” since Israel closed its settlements there in 2005.

But since the Gaza Strip is under economic and military siege, its land and sea borders sealed, its territory at the mercy of Israeli bombs and shells each time Hamas fires its real but inaccurate rockets into Israel – often in retaliation for Israeli raids into Gaza itself – it’s nitpicking to claim that this does not constitute a form of occupation.

As Alexander added, “we must not tolerate Israel’s refusal even to discuss the right of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes, as prescribed by United Nations resolutions” without mentioning that these were unbinding UN General Assembly resolutions and that few Palestinians inside the West Bank and Gaza – let alone in the vast Palestinian diaspora – really believe that the 1948 refugees and their descendants will “return” to property inside what is now Israel.

The host of critics, in Israel as well as the US, who now assault the latest taboo-breaking liberal American academic probably do realise just how serious Alexander’s op-ed could turn out to be.

They complain that infinitely worse assaults on human rights have occurred in Syria, Iraq, Chechnya, Kurdistan. True. But Israel’s role as an American ally changes such equations. The Syrians, the Iraqis, the ocean of Arab dictators and their torturers, the Russians in Ukraine and the Turks in Kurdistan do not claim to represent us, except insofar as they all now trumpet their apocalyptic battle against “world terror”.

But the Israelis say they are just like us, that they represent our values of democracy and freedom, that they are upholding our freedoms, that Israel and America must be inseparable. And then they treat the Palestinians with brutality, deny their nationhood, steal and colonise their lands – and expect us to shut up.

The very blackmail which has been historically used against US politicians, diplomats, journalists and academics – that they are “antisemitic” if they dare to express their outrage at Israel’s actions – is one of Alexander’s targets. The fear engendered by the Canary Mission website, which lists pro-Palestinian students and professors, and local US legislation that can deprive American citizens of their livelihood if they choose to boycott products from a foreign country called Israel, is causing real anger.

That’s why attempts to ram through new legislation against boycott movements is being opposed by Bernie Sanders and his colleagues. The “silence” which Alexander is breaking on the Middle East represents the very threat to American free speech which Sanders – whether or not he’s a presidential candidate in 2020 – has identified.

Yet now we’ve reached another weird precedent in the efforts of Israel’s supposed friends to silence Alexander. For many of them are now telling her what Martin Luther King would have said if he were alive today. He was a Zionist, they tell her. He would repudiate her views. So a black woman academic must now be told how she should interpret the thoughts and example of her own iconic and inspirational black leader.

And if the brave and liberal members of America’s Jewish community who condemn Israel are regularly smeared as “self-hating Jews”, what does that make Alexander?


49 thoughts to “Why Americans are breaking their silence on Israel”

  1. “For many of them are now telling her what Martin Luther King would have said if he were alive today. He was a Zionist, they tell her. He would repudiate her views. So a black woman academic must now be told how she should interpret the thoughts and example of her own iconic and inspirational black leader.”
    no, she shouldn’t have to be a king clone every time.. but it was a fair enough salvo… she can’t have it both ways, even if she is a woman..
    as far as king goes – he came up through the churches, working those ready-made crowds like politicians and gospel singers will do… so he would want to tread lightly there, alienate no-one… at the time zionism wasn’t known for the villainous scourge it is now… people hadn’t even heard how communism is jewish, how the jews own the bank; it hadn’t come to pass yet the social destruction their entertainment media was up to.. many would say king was a commie himself… him and angela davis.. what the heck was malcom x? it’s understandable if he went dumb on the zionists way back then… it would sure be interesting to see him face farrakhan on that subject now though.. i wish a lot of outspoken ones were still around for that discussion… it’s only been since the internet that the big mazaltavy swindle has become known, and many still refuse to grasp its size and scope… see how they hold on tight to hitler…
    yes, there is antisemitism, as they call it, in the new democratic party.. and its throwing a wrench into the big jew gears inside the swamp… most dems don’t even want the airhead socialism either.. they’re really just there as shady republicans, maintaining the permanent underclass, delivering the big poor-people food stamp and vaccine subsidies to walmart and big-pharma..

    1. Well said, Barkingdeer! You have made several interesting points here that cannot be disputed.

      The growth of a genuine antisemitism in the major political parties — you will find the same in the U.K. and in many European countries — is spooking the Jews. Suddenly they don’t feel quite so secure any longer. People have started kicking them off their pedestals. They get fewer obsequious smiles nowadays, more hisses.

      1. Has anyone ever heard anyone give a definition of “antisemitism”? Of course I suppose only a jew can give a proper definition of it. Heck, even back in 1922 when Hilaire Belloc wrote his book “The Jews,” he could write, “….if you call a Jew a Jew, you are an anti-semite.” (BTW, his secretary for many years was a Jewess.) As for me, I say we shouldn’t use our enemies’ loaded and weaponized and amorphous terms. When we’re opposed to jewish criminal and inhuman behavior, we should be called anti-judaic, since we’re opposing the jewish talmudic ideology – we’re not saying that we oppose the jews as a race, that we oppose jewish DNA. That would be antisemitism, if you can call it that, since a great majority of them aren’t even semites. Unfortunately today “truth” means the opinion of the powerful more than the correspondence between the mind and reality. If one holds to the latter definition then persecution in some form or other is in store for him. It is what happens to anyone who defends unpopular and uncomfortable truth, especially when it comes to the objective moral order established by God, fully proclaimed by Christ, and likewise by Christian tradition, although much less so today than in years past. But that’s another subject, although intricately related.

      2. I have never seen a coherent definition of “anti-Semitism” (or “antisemitism.”) My view is that any group that identifies itself as such, via advocacy organizations or discussion of its situation as a group, and criticizes other groups or makes claims on behalf of itself must accept being rebutted or criticized as a group. Simple, eh?

    2. marchin lootin king was another magic negro whose every word in his speeches was written by his Bolshevik white hating communist jew handlers. but I repeat myself. why is it that only white hating kneegrows are against pissrael? REAL conservatives like Pat Buchanan were always against Israel but the neo-cohens hijacked the right wing turned it into a invite the world invade the world for Israel welfare warfare state while implementing a multi trillion dollar police spying state. the utterly total opposite of what conservatism was founded on

    3. King’s FBI file is online and the contents suggest King was receptive to Communist doctrine, though it was not his main focus. Rosa Parks was schooled by Communists and her refusal to take a seat in the back of the bus was practiced many times before the filmed version, to which reporters were invited. The preponderance of Jews within radical and Communist organizations was even more obvious then than it is now. The author must be a young person; anyone old enough to remember those years knows that both the “old left” and the “new left” were heavily Jewish, and this fact was obvious though one was not supposed to talk about it. As to what King would think about Palestine, I’m sure he would have some sympathy for the Palestinians. Israel’s blockade of Gaza is an act of war, so Gaza is justified in fighting back though it has no ability to do so. People who live in Gaza are effectively under Israeli rule, which makes the “human shield” excuse for killing them dubious. If they were Israelis they could not be killed on that pretext.

  2. Divide and Conquer…..Divide and Conquer…..

    “….a nation with a collective, room-temp IQ”

    “Americans are the most misled, misdirected, and therefore the most gullible people on the face of the planet” ~ Alan Hart, author, ‘Zionism; The True Threat to Israel

    “No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public” ~ Mencken

    PS:Which Party Will Claim Victory On Election Night?
    Can’t tell you who will win (well, besides Israel), but I can tell you who will lose; America, and Americans.

  3. If the ‘ whites’ would be smart, they should be friends with personss like mrs. Alexander etc and form an united front against the jews. Even if this friendship would be for white’s opportunic reasons and even for a limited period.
    There is no other way to solve the jewish problem.

    1. wrong. the negress hates white people. you are part of the self hating suicidal whites whose only goal is to ferret out every racist in the galaxy while refusing to see the genocide that is being carried out against whites

    2. @Jewdar – I agree with you said but SPQR0AD is correct when he says blacks hate whites. Although the Jews only use minorities to weaken and destroy whites, minorities (Blacks and Latinos) won’t stay blind forever that they benefit from Jews pushing illegal immigration and racial quotas for school admissions and jobs. Still, I think high minded whites should stick up for their own rights and look to work together with minorities that think Israeli’s are murderers and Jews have too much power in the US and other countries. The first thing the minorities and grossly uninformed whites must be made aware of is that all that “white privilege” is actually Jewish privilege. The days when WASP’s or Catholics ran the US are long gone. The Jews have been in power for at least 40 years and had a lot of power before that already.

      President Nixon and Reverend Billy Graham discussing Jews domination of the media in 1972. It has only gotten worse since then. Ignore the commentary trying to deflect from the truth of what Nixon and Graham said. When we can talk openly about these things Jewish power will then decrease.


  4. MLK was a spook (no, not the racialist meaning!) with the same old MO — to disrupt genuine revolutionary movements. He was a Communist, thus marking himself out as a shill for the masters — communism was always a cover for the agents of the industrialists and the financiers. Why else would the MSM glorify him? He was as fake as the nukes they keep going on about.

    1. Ain’t that the truth. And this idiocy is clearly work of controlled opposition. The NY Times, gee how did those staid anti-israel views slip through? Come on, people.

    2. martin lucifer king was put up by communist jews and hand fed every word in his speeches written by the jews. he was put up EXACTLY the way joe slovo inserted the senile simpleton mandela to destroy south afreaka. we will end up exactly like south afreaka where it is legal to kill whites and take what they got. that is as sure as the turning of the earth

  5. I tell you a major event that happened a few days ago. near the end of the shutdown trump wandered off the jew reservation for one tweet where he said….Chuck U Schumer the voice of Israel in the senate got the money to pay for israels wall but denying it for the US. to me that was a nuclear bomb compared to the firecracker from aunt jemima

  6. Hmm. So the worn out canard “antiSemite” is expanding in this sty. For the LIFE of me, I simply CANNOT fathom WHY a lucid human would feel “slighted” by the (self) chosen.

    Well, unless the following might have something to do with it:

    “Thanks to the terrible power of our international banks, we have forced the Christians into wars without number. Wars have a special value for Jews, Since Christians massacre each other and make more room for us Jews. Wars are the Jews’ Harvest, The Jew banks grow fat on Christian wars. Over 100 million Christians have been swept off the face of the earth by wars and the end is not yet.”

    Rabbi Reichorn 1869 http://www.truedemocracy.net/hj32/28.html

    White genocide
    Palestinian genocide
    (along with every other nation invaded by and slaughtered by the Bolshevik Jew and their shabbos goi)
    Of course it’s ALL LIES, right?

    Head of British Psychological Warfare Executive (Propaganda), Victor Cavendish-Bentick in a handwritten note, wrote on Aug 27th, 1943, “We have had a good run for our money with this gas chamber story we have been putting about, but don’t we run the risk eventually we are going to be found out and when we are found out the collapse of that lie is going to bring the whole of our psychological warfare down with it? So isn’t it rather time now to let it drift off by itself and concentrate on other lines that we are running.” Public Record Office Document F0371/34551 revealed by Stephen Mitford Goodson, ‘Inside the South African Reserve Bank’.


    A Judaic male is obligated to say the following prayer every day:
    “Thank you G-d for not making me a gentile, a woman or a slave.”
    (BT Menahoth 43b – 44a)
    “Regarding bloodshed, the following distinction applies:
    If a non-Jew killed another non-Jew, or a non-Jew killed a Jew, the killer is liable for execution: If a Jew killed a non-Jew he is exempt from punishment.”
    Babylonian Talmud: BT Sanhedrin 57a
    “Since God already gave the Torah to the Jewish People on Mt. Sinai we no longer pay attention to heavenly voices.
    God must submit to the decisions of the majority vote of the rabbis”
    BT Bava Metzia 59b

    “TORAH: This word is Orthodox Judaism’s badge of authority. The Rabbis proclaim that they have the Torah, have mastered the Torah, base their laws on the Torah and that they are Torah true. Yet these rabbinic claims are merely a deceptive play on words, for the “Torah” which they base their laws upon is the formerly Oral Tradition of the Pharisees known as the Torah SheBeal Peh consisting of the Mishnah and Gemara, which comprise the Talmud as well as subsequent enactments by esteemed rabbinic legal authorities.
    Consequently, when the rabbis are boasting about their relationship with the “Torah,” Christians are deceived into imagining that the rabbis are harkening to the Old Testament, known as the Torah SheBichtav
    Actually, Orthodox Judaism’s Law has no basis in the divine Old Testament (Torah SheBichtav). (…”).

    “It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not ~ they will be killed.” ~ Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg

    “We have exterminated the property owners in Russia. We are going to do the same thing in Europe and America
    (The Jew, December, 1925, Zinobit)

    Quote from “You Gentiles” by Maurice Samuel;

    “We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers for ever. Nothing that you do will meet our needs and demands. We will for ever destroy because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build. (Pg 155)

    “It is in the JEWISH INTEREST, it is in humanities interest that whites experience a genocide. Until white children are burned alive, white women raped, mutilated, murdered and all white men who have not been slaughtered watch powerlessly as their people are terrorized; only then will mankind be on a more equal footing, ready to discuss white privilege. – AND THE APPARENT CHIP ON THE SHOULDER THAT MINORITIES HAVE.”
    Ishmael Levitts (caps mine)

    “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race”
    Dr. Noel Ignatiev – Jew

    The above is a TINY sample from a Jew holy man and a Jew educator, published with immunity, can you IMAGINE the UPROAR by the Jew and their “snowflake” puppets if one were to replace “whites” with “Jew”?

    It’s time we HUMAN BEINGS of ALL races realize we have ONE common enemy, (along with their shabbos goi/sycophants), that enemy of mankind is the Jew.

  7. I agree with this writer although I would never vote for a Democrat again because they are unbelievably terrible…
    There is some undercurrent, though, with Israel and the globalists that I don’t quite understand that is new. Maybe Israel has been written off or downgraded in some way in their minds–people in high places saying things like Israel won’t be here in such and such a year. Of course, these are the people who think they can manage the entire world and everyone in it through mind control, propaganda, fear, drugs, etc. Oh well. I think that people who live in Israel and love it should change their ways, they should start thinking of themselves as middle eastern and those people who are shivering in the cold as their neighbors and future relatives.

  8. Supposedly black, but resembles a white gal with a great tan. However, in the 1940s and previous era, she’d be knocking herself out trying to Pass As White. Always trying to have it both ways. Whichever way the wind blows, there you’ll find her kind. I don’t care if she is antiisrael or proisrael. It’s not my business. She hates white people aplenty and always will.

    1. Wyandotte makes a great point. As pertinent as it is rarely mentioned. Likely something to do with the old enemy of my enemy trick, I would think.

      A couple other people here have also previously mentioned how, upon seeing the average Jew and Gentile walking down the street, the average black/brown will matter of factly say;
      “they all look alike to me”

      Malcolm X and Louis Farrakhan both told me so..

  9. Law Professor Alexander’s powerful commentary on Palestinian suffering covers what’s been long suppressed in the mainstream.

    ISISrael and her lovers in the US are having a total meltdown over Professor Alexander column. The Jewish lobby monopoly over the US is past the expiration date. What a relief!

  10. Although the original article contains many salient and necessarily thought-provoking points, it’s disappointing to the point of being shocking that Lasha actually gives any credence to the UK publication “The Daily Mail”. This, which will be familiar to readers from the UK, is a nauseatingly ill-informed, poorly written, badly researched hate vessel which merely furthers the interests of the its Zionist owners.

    To cite the Mail in what is meant to be an intellectual for dealing with such meaningful issues as race, ideology and war is preposterous. Almost begs the question – is Lasha for real, or a Zionist provacateur?

    1. @ Octavius

      To cite the Mail in what is meant to be an intellectual for dealing with such meaningful issues as race, ideology and war is preposterous. Almost begs the question – is Lasha for real, or a Zionist provacateur?

      Your assumption that Lasha Darkmoon admires the Daily Mail because she frequently makes use of it and “cites” it is logically flawed. Lasha actually believes that this is one of the most dangerous Zionist papers in the UK and that it has become even worse — i.e., more extreme in the blatant dishonesty of its political coverage — within the last year. This is partly caused, LD believes, by the arrival of a new editor-in chief who is ultra-Zionist and pro-elite.

      If you dislike Lasha Darkmoon because you think she is a Zionist shill, you need to explain why Kevin MacDonald has published over 30 of her most outspoken anti-Zionist articles on the Occidental Observer, including her recent article which makes heavy use of the Daily Mail to make her emphatically anti-Jewish points:


      Here is a quote from the same article that makes your ill-informed comment about LD being a “Zionist provacateur (sic)” seem even more unfair and unjust:

      For yet more on the concerted effort to funnel a whole new generation of Third-World immigrants into Western countries, check out this groundbreaking exposé by Andrew Joyce tracing the hidden Jewish hand in starting the ball rolling as early as 1948, the same year international Jewry managed to found their apartheid, ethnic-cleansing state on the ruins of Palestine. Joyce has researched this topic for several years and is now collating his extensive notes for a full-length book on the subject. He writes:

      “From the early 19th century until the First World War, English Jewry was ruled by a tightly connected oligarchy. Daniel Gutwein states that this Anglo-Jewish elite comprised some twenty inter-related Ashkenazi and Sephardic families including the houses of Goldsmith, Montagu, Nathan, Cohen, Isaacs, Abrahams, Samuel, and Montefiore. At its head, of course, stood the House of Rothschild.”

      Fast forward to the 21st century and to the present incumbent of 10 Downing Street … and join the dots. Here is Francis Carr Begbie in an article published three weeks after the British referendum of 23 June 2016:

      “Anyone wondering about the priorities of Mrs Theresa May should follow her actions from the moment she learned she was to become Britain’s next Prime Minister. Her first act was to sign a pledge committing her to remember the Holocaust and ‘stand up to hatred and intolerance’. And her second was to spend the evening before her confirmation by the Queen at a private dinner at the home of Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis.”


      The Daily Mail is a great cheerleader for Theresa May and promotes her fake Brexit plan. Does LD do this? No, she does not! LD loathes Theresa May and her fake Brexit plan and has said so several times. So LD takes an OPPOSITE line from the Daily Mail, a paper she thoroughly despises but is prepared to make use of.

      Your comment about LD being a Zionist provocateur is not only ill-informed, it is downright nasty.

      — Sister Monica, Assistant site moderator

      1. Hi Sister Monica,
        Regarding the Daily Mail, I also noticed a change in the paper. I didn’t know there was a new Editor. I have now changed to the Daily Express.

        1. @ John Kirby

          LD is only too aware, as you are, that the Daily Mail has changed radically within the last six months. For the worse! It has not only changed its political stance, being ultra-Zionist and trying to wreck Brexit, but it has also become sexually sleazier and tries to distract attention by focussing on the private lives of celebrities and other trivia. The old editor, Paul Dacre, was far better. He’d been at the helm for decades. Then he retired. His replacement? The editor of the Daily Mail’s sister paper, The Mail on Sunday, a worthless Sunday rag hardly worth reading. The new editor is called Geordie Greig who is a Remainer and an avowed Brexit hater.


      2. Hi Sister Monica,
        I also read the Daily Telegraph. The Daily Mail used to be a great paper, but is now a mess. I am a dyed-in-the-wool conservative, but have had my faith in the Conservative Party shaken these past three years.

        1. @ John Kirby

          LD and myself are on the same trajectory as you. However, we have now come to realise that both major parties are controlled by the Jews in varying degrees. The very existence of the vast numbers of Conservative MPs who are “Friends of Israel” and are also died-in-the-wool Remainers, is a testimony to the fact that they are not really interested in giving the British people what they voted for in the referendum of June 2016.

          We strongly believe that Theresa May is not to be trusted and that her Brexit plans are a fake Brexit. Corbyn of course would be infinitely worse and let in even more immigrants, but remember that the Conservatives have taken no steps to curb mass immigration either. The illegal immigrants are still pouring into Britain in vast numbers, thanks to the people smugglers and inadequate border security, and Theresa May and her minions are doing nothing to stop it.

          We don’t think this is a question of mere incompetence, we think it is complicity and collusion. They WANT more immigrants, especially from the Third World, and they are determined to have them. This is what LD believes, and I subscribe to the same belief.

      3. I agree. Notwithstanding the threat of Mr Corbyn becoming Prime Minister the next election will be lost by the Conservatives, and they may be out of power for a generation. They continue to defy the wishes of the people. We voted to leave the EU, not for some deal that was never even mentioned in the campaign or in the party manifesto.

        I find Conservative voters becoming angrier, and now intending to teach the party a lesson it will never forget. Even those MPs who survive will see their career plans come to nothing.

        I think there is an electoral revolution under way now.

        1. You could be right, but how sad for the Tories that they should have had one of the most incompetent and duplicitous prime ministers in living memory. Not a patch on Margaret Thatcher. So it seems we have a Corbyn government waiting in the wings, with all the horrors that a Marxist government entails… a plummeting pound, hyperinflation, civil unrest, strikes, race riots.

          Now who could be Britain’s charismatic “rescuer”? That’s the big question. As LD keeps saying: “Cometh the Hour, cometh the Man.”

      4. Hi Sister Monica,
        My preference would be Jacob Rhys Mogg, but any Leaver would be fine.

        I think It is now too late to save the day. Mrs May is secure for a year.

    2. @ Octavius

      I’m sure Lasha really opposes the Jews, otherwise why would she provide us, Darkmooners, a media platform?

      1. Because the CIA paid LD to do so, thus creating a “honey pot” for fingering self-identified Jew haters? There you go. CONs’ Piracies exposed, those who know and self-identify as knowledgeable — the first category (as in 200 Years Together) you want to “eliminate”.

        BINGO! Done deal. No matter how pure one’s heart, someone will find a way to paint it BLACK (thnx Rolling Stones and Mick [ Sir Michael Philip Jagger] Jagger for that). To explore more of “peerage” and the “lineage” — and (((their))) involvement in modern day scams. I cannot recommend more highly than I have, the work of Miles Mathis, currently easily found on the web.

      2. Alan, good point! But I believe Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, Google, etc. can compile this black list in a mass scale, why (((they))) would need LD to do that?
        I know you are being rhetorical; I’m just trying to nullify the argument in a logical way. 🙂

  11. I think Louis Farrakhan summed it up best when he recently said, “Some people say I’m anti-Semite. I am NOT anti-Semite. I am ANTI-TERMITE. ”

    Who could argue with that?

  12. “And if the brave and liberal members of America’s Jewish community who condemn Israel are regularly smeared as “self-hating Jews”, what does that make Alexander?”


  13. We all know opposing the State of Israel is something remarkable and courageous, but just the first step. What about real opposition to Jewish Power, can this leftist brown lady give us that?

    1. @ nothing but, why don’t we start to get rid of the italian jews living in Italy who have the keypositions ruling over the real italians. The real italians in Italy are frequently unempkoyed or have a low income. For this reason many real italians must emigrate to other countries to find themselves again slaves of other jews in these countries. You shoukd know this if you are a real italian.

      1. Hi Jewdar,

        Why don’t we get rid of all the Jews in positions of power across the world and send them to the Promised Land? Wasn’t that the creation purpose of that little pet State, in 1948?
        Not that easy pal…

  14. Even Stalin, who was quite effective in moving peoples around, couldn’t get all the Soviet Jews to move to the Autonomous Jewish Province of Birobidzhan in Sibera he created especially for them, so what chance of “we” moving them anywhere? Funnily enough, when I last checked on wikipedia, that Jewish Siberian province seems to have adopted a rainbow flag. I wonder if they’re trying to attract some other minority settlers as I suppose most of the residents have long moved to more profitable destinations in Russia and the world, especially Israel.

  15. There is a huge risk with the BDS becoming a standard of the DNC….

    …. How do you think these unhinged leftists will treat a conservative Christian like myself who is sympathetic to the plight of Palestine?

    Hint: it most certainly will not involve compassion and empathy to me and my values… More likely I will be shamed, beaten, reported for hate speech and run out of town..

  16. My dear Mom died yesterday, so I won’t be around for a while. But before I say goodbye for a time, I want to suggest to Darkmoon commentators that they look at the Canary Mission website mentioned in the above article. This Canary Mission website affords a good insight into the Jewish mind, in my opinion. McCarthy exposed Marxists. This was said by Jews to be a very bad violation of American values. Please look at what Canary Mission does!

    1. May your mother ascend to her heavenly reward. My mother passed on at 92 years, but only after she assured herself her three children, me and my two younger sisters, were secure and safe and no longer needed her. Yes, we siblings prolonged my mother’s life!

      GOD bless you KB, I look forward to your return to front lines here on Darkmoon.

  17. I saw one poster referring to Miles Mathis to which I concur. Read and go to his website and you will find out that our rulers, kings etc., were always jews or internarried with jews. Of course they have hidden this for us from the beginning of times. Read the four sequels regarding the Spooks.

  18. i like miles mathis too…
    he looks under the rocks..
    he’s not quite as smart as he thinks he is (me neither).. i did catch him in one mistake… he didn’t quite understand how it was that patty hearst and cinque were able to access their sawed-off shotguns slung on their shoulders under their overcoats – all you have to do is cut the pocket out… but his insights are 90%…
    he’s got the first rule of waking down – don’t believe the media narrative about anything…
    i think ed chiarini’s stuff is well worth looking at too, at wellaware.whatever… he’s censored now, you can bet..
    ed chiarini has patty hearst photographed on the scene as one of the bundi people in that fiasco from a couple years ago.. he thinks ed harris played the guy who was shot – what was his name? cliven bundy, right?
    the hearst newspapers were the first, back in the spanish american war period, to quit open journalism and concentrate totally on manipulating public opinion… we can see there’s no real journalism in corp-media now..
    of course it was theodore roosevelt, bth, who planted the bomb in the maine in havana harbor, him high in the office of the secretary of the navy, like his cousin franklin did later on along with first admiralty lord winston churchill, where they had the lusitania sunk to help get the usa into the war in europe…
    ed says the whole political thing is an act, and i’m not even sure how wrong he is….. theresa may is really princes diana, pocahontas elizibeth warren is really anne bennington WARREN beatty’s wife and old joe kennedy was really quentin roosevelt… i think he was one of the psychopath theodore’s kids…
    ed goes pretty much off of resemblances, which can blur enough over 30 years or so to make you wonder…
    i’m sure if i went back to appalachia now after 50 years of being gone, half the people i grew up with wouldn’t recognize me…
    sometimes he’s probably going to be over the edge, yes… i can’t quite get to it – that morgan freeman is actually jimi hendrix and chevy chase is really jim morrison…
    miles mathis does say for sure though that more than one rock star has faked his death, so he could live a more private life, including john lennon…
    while we have michelle alexander (a jew name – obviously planted for this article), we should tell her a few things she probably doesn’t even know about mlk..
    i forget what miles has to say about hm, but i’m sure he touched that groove too…
    james earl ray was part of the chickencock whiskey bronfman’s permindex “direct political action committee”…
    the 18th amendment outlawing booze in 1919 was designed to increase the fortunes of the big bootleggers and also to further corrupt the police forces in the usa, developing gangsterism in general and building the infrastructure for the coming hard dope traffic… all the while the bronfmans ran their whiskey across the canadian border, much of it across the great lakes, in the “jewish navy”… they “scammed’ their dough into legal seagrams, when the 18th amendment was repealed in 1933, when fdr came to the swamp…
    in other words the bronfmans have their own little cadre of hit-squad killers, who are used to shepherd their favorite politicians… how do we put it delicately? – keep them safe from too much competition… they don’t play fair, not if they’re going to lose… simply killing off the other candidates or wiping the current officeholder, if you’re the vice president, as in the case of theodore roosevelt v mckinley and jfk v lbj, is an ancient tactic coming out of the middle east, well used by the assassin muslims too… mlk was used and thrown away…
    they work in close cahoots with the british monarchy, which is of course jewish/israeli and are knighted into the order of saint john by the queen… this gives them diplomatic immunity, as though they were national emissaries… most likely it was the bronfmans’ permindex jews who killed the kennedys… fyi michelle…

  19. Please, you are making far too much of NYT’s publishing one piece like this.

    Day-in, day-out, the NYT does everything that Israel could wish for, from passing all news stories about Israel by the official Israeli censor before publishing – a confirmed fact – to the heavy use of euphemism in describing almost all of Israel’s ugly behavior.

    One little piece like this is almost a kind of game.

Comments are closed.