Ghislaine Maxwell broke down in tears as she was denied bail to live in ‘luxury’ New York hotel

News.com.au
July 15, 2020

GHISLAINE  MAXWELL . . . TEARS

Ghislaine Maxwell broke down in tears today as she was denied bail to live in a “luxury” Manhattan hotel.

The British socialite was wearing a brown T-shirt with her hair up in a bun when she pleaded not guilty via video link to charges related to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking ring.

She was denied freedom on a $5 million bond to live in a “luxury” Manhattan hotel on bail, after Annie Farmer (pictured) – one of her accusers – gave powerful testimony to the judge, The Sun reported.

Judge Alison Nathan ruled that Maxwell, 58, will stay behind bars until her trial in July next year for allegedly recruiting girls for Epstein to sexually abuse.

The judge determined that Maxwell will be “ordered to be detained pending trial.”

Judge Nathan set a trial date July 12 2021, and the government proposed blocking out three weeks for the trial.

Maxwell told the Manhattan courthouse on Tuesday her plea of “not guilty your honor”

“Not Guilty!”

The British socialite ignored the orders of FBI agents during her arrest on sex-trafficking charges and had her mobile phone wrapped in tinfoil, prosecutors said Monday as they urged a US judge to deny her bail request.

Attorneys for the Southern District of New York said in a court filing that agents had to breach the front door of the 58-year-old’s luxury home, ‘Tucked Away’ (pictured) to detain her on July 2.

“Through a window, the agents saw the defendant ignore the direction to open the door and, instead, try to flee to another room in the house, quickly shutting a door behind her,” the prosecution wrote.

The allegation was made in response to Maxwell’s lawyers asking New York Judge Alison Nathan to release their client on bond of $5 million during Tuesday’s bail hearing.

They insist that Maxwell — who has been charged with six counts related to the alleged sex crimes of her former boyfriend — is not a flight risk.

Maxwell is accused of grooming and recruiting minor girls to travel and engage in sex acts with Epstein, who killed himself in prison last year while awaiting trial.

Her defence team said she “vigorously” denies the charges and “intends to fight them,” during a written plea for bail submitted on Friday.

The prosecution responded by saying Maxwell’s conduct at the time of her arrest suggests she may use her wealth and three passports to try to flee justice.

They said that during a search of her house, the agents found a cell phone wrapped in tin foil — “a seemingly misguided effort to evade detection … by law enforcement.”

The government’s attorneys added that a security guard told the agents that Maxwell’s brother had hired a security company staffed with former British military members to guard her New Hampshire property.

“She appears to be skilled at living in hiding,” the prosecution said. The charges against her include conspiracy to entice minors as young as 14 years old to travel in order to engage in illegal sex acts.

Maxwell is also accused of taking part in some of the sexual abuse and of committing perjury during a 2016 lawsuit.

Maxwell is due to appear via video-link in court Tuesday.

Her arrest has put fresh scrutiny on Britain’s Prince Andrew, who vehemently denies claims he had sex with a 17-year-old girl (pictured here) procured by Epstein.

Source

VIDEO   :   3.39 mins

61 thoughts to “Ghislaine Maxwell broke down in tears as she was denied bail to live in ‘luxury’ New York hotel”

  1. It is all scripted, photo/video manipulated nonsense. But people will continue to believe mainstream stories. Oy Gevalt!

    You are better off reading quality fiction instead of the cringing cliches our modern spooks write for us. At least back in the day they were original. HINT: Gilly was never arrested.

    1. “HINT: Gilly was never arrested.”

      Thus spake Flopot.

      Any proof Gilly was never arrested?

      I await your evidence with bated breath.

      1. you ask for evidence. how about if she was arrested, she wanted to be. she is a french national and the daughter of a billionaire. why would she come to the states and “hide” in a million dollar house if she could live in france? remember, france has no extradition treaty with the u.s.
        why are they now using sketch artists for bail hearings? the did the same for the cop accused of killing floyd. during the trial some states barr cameras, but the bail hearing?

      2. Flopot is right.She was never arrested. It’s all smoke.What is the source of info that she was crying. Remember, the media always show what they want you to see,not what you want to see.I am surprised that this site prints garbage from the mainstream media.

      3. @ Premanidhi

        “Flopot is right.She was never arrested.”

        Evidence? — You have none. Otherwise you would produce it. Merely to state “she was never arrested” is not evidence of non-arrest.

        “I am surprised that this site prints garbage from the mainstream media.”

        The article was published on Truthseeker first. Truthseeker is the very opposite of a mainstream site. It’s an AltRight, anti-Zionist, Holocaust-denying site.

        http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=210398

        Well done, Darkmoon, for republishing this article from Truthseeker — a site we all respect!

        I’m glad this site refuses to publish sub-standard articles written by cranks and crackpots who can barely spell their own names. What would you like? More articles on Flat Earth theory? 🙂

      4. “I am surprised that this site prints garbage from the mainstream media.”

        I don’t think we need to apologize for the articles we publish. We have made our position clear in our Site Policy Statement:

        # 16. Sources. We make use of both alternative media sources and mainstream sources. If our commenters object to the stories we publish or the sources we choose, they are welcome to say so. But if they continue to find fault with our choice of stories and attempt to lecture us on what to publish and what not to publish, we will invite them politely to seek out another website more congenial to their tastes.

        https://www.darkmoon.me/site-policies-and-guidelines/

    2. @ Flopot

      Since you appear to believe that everything we are told is a lot of poppycock, obviously you have access to rare sources of information that present a totally different viewpoint of the world.

      Please do start up your own website, so that all our readers may abandon this inadequate website and receive the “Truth” — and “nothing bit the truth” — from the omniscient Flopot and his Secret Sources of Occult Information. 🙂

      1. @ FLOPOT

        [TO SISTER MONICA] : You are asking me to prove that a mainstream story is not true. You defeat yourself.

        Your snotty little comments dissing this website for publishing “mainstream” articles do not impress me. You are not only a fool but an ill-mannered boor.

        FYI, this article was also published on Truthseeker, an AltRight website for political dissidents:

        http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=210398

        If it’s good enough for Truthseeker, it should be good enough for you, you boorish little pipsqueak!

        Lasha Darkmoon has had 320 articles published on Truthseeker, so I think she deserves some respect. And so do the moderators of this excellent website who could do without your sneers.

        http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?author=133

      2. Give Flopot a break. He’s obviously going through a bad time. For his own sake, I’d advise him to exercise more tact and politeness. He’s a guest here at Darkmoon’s dinner table, so to speak, and should therefore avoid spitting in the potage du jour — the soup of the day.

      3. Well said, Sister Monica! Let the All-Knowing Flopot be our trusty Light in the Darkness of Universal Ignorance!

        So far he has taught us nothing except how to sneer at all the usual sources of information. He has yet to provide us with a single fact or piece of information of his own.

        It appears that Mr Omniscience knows nothing except that no one knows anything — including himself! 🙂

      4. If you don’t like dogfights, don’t start one.

        Why should your insolence be tolerated in the name
        of free speech and your critics be censored?

    3. your comment is spot on. more and more things look rehearsed or photos doctored.
      the woman wanted to be arrested (if she even was). a french national, wanted by u.s. authorities, living in the states in a million dollar home! please, give me break!!

    4. Flo –

      I also doubt she was ever ‘arrested’ at all. This whole set of events, real or manufactured, is a way to put the Epstein saga and clients list in the rear-view mirror. The MSM will then drive away slowly and it will forgotten in the news cycles. The public is always given lies.

      1. @ ALL CONSPIRACY THEORISTS

        Flopot’s response to all these endorsements of his original insights would be more than welcome. I would ask him, however, to refrain from aggressive comments like “WHO LET THE DOGS OUT?” The Darkmoon site is not here to protect Flopot and his kind from criticism. There are people here who disagree with Flopot and have asked him politely for “evidence”, and they must not be silenced and censored by Admin.

        Conspiracy theorists are more than welcome to post here — this site is positively swarming with them! — but I see no reason why level-headed types like me and Sardonicus who ask for “evidence” should be mocked and abused for doing so. Asking for evidence is not a crime.

        We sober heads have as much right to be here as you wild-eyed conspiracy theorists! Why should you conspiracy theorists call all the shots here? Are you such snowflakes that you can’t stand any disagreement?

        You know something . . . you conspiracy theorists are just a mutual masturbation club!

      2. Well said, Butterfly! You will receive nothing but hatred for standing up to the bullying tactics of the Flopot Gang. Don’t bother to engage with them. Let them chase their own tails round the block!

        Asking for “evidence” is a crime.

        Agreeing with everything they say is compulsory.

      3. Sardonicus,

        I think you need to calm done a bit.

        Enjoy a cup of green tea in the monastery garden with your abbot and try and find a way forward among the thicket of conflicting opinions.

      4. MB –
        Sard –

        Both of you have written numerous times that disagreement is healthy. So…. you argue your own points. 🙂

        MB wrote:
        “You know something . . . you conspiracy theorists are just a mutual masturbation club!”

        Mentioning a “MUTUAL MASTURBATION CLUB” makes NO points in either of your favors. In fact, it weaken your suggestions… very “BIGGLY”!!

        Sis got it right. 🙂

    1. Photos are not allowed in court. The pictures you see in this article are court artists’ impressions and are more accurate than old mugshots. You will see the identical pictures in the YouTube video at the end of the article.

    2. RB –
      Saki –

      Mugshots’ are taken when arrested… and put into police/FBI files before court appearances.

      BUT…. FEDERAL mugshots aren’t public anymore as THE Court ends routine access to federal mugshots in 2016!!

      Public access to mugshots of people arrested on federal criminal charges will be dramatically curtailed under a ruling issued by a federal appeals court, unless the Supreme Court steps in.

      On a 9-7 vote, the full bench of the Cincinnati-based 6th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a two-decade-old legal precedent that allowed news organizations and others to obtain booking photos of criminal defendants who’ve appeared in federal court.

      Writing for the majority, Judge Deborah Cook found erroneous a 1996 6th Circuit decision essentially guaranteeing access to mugshots requested under the federal Freedom of Information Act. Both that case and the one the court ruled on Thursday were brought by the Detroit Free Press.

      Calling mugshots “squarely within [the] realm of embarrassing and humiliating information,” Cook noted that they’re considered so damaging to a person’s reputation that they can’t normally be shown at a trial.

      “Booking photos convey guilt to the viewer,” she wrote. “Indeed, viewers so uniformly associate booking photos with guilt and criminality that we strongly disfavor showing such photos to criminal juries.”
      https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/07/mugshots-federal-criminal-suspects-225546

      1. You know why they have decided this? Because the majority of the arrested are non-White and their published mugshots would “confirm racist prejudices”!

        As for Ghislaine Maxwell, she would gladly forsake $5 million bail money of her estimated $20 million capital to escape a jail time of 35 years. She is 58 years old now. Better try to escape now to the beaches of Tel Aviv than wait until her 93rd birthday!

      2. FR –

        Thanks for the help. I like your guess.

        I am guessing that it was ruled to help public officials get off more lightly when they get arrested. The ruling date of 2016 is very telling to me.

        This reason is not a guess:
        “Booking photos convey guilt to the viewer,” she wrote. “Indeed, viewers so uniformly associate booking photos with guilt and criminality that we strongly disfavor showing such photos to criminal juries.”

      3. @ Pat

        Excellent comment on mugshots. I had no idea federal mugshots had been disallowed in 2016. It’s quite true that these mugshots create the subliminal effect in most people’s minds that the person in the mugshot is “GUILTY”. And that’s wrong.

        Hence the need for artists’ sketches in court. They give the public a good idea of what the defendant actually looks like in the present moment.

  2. The G, Maxwell case is all a psyop, she or a double was brought back to America to bring down Trump and she has in my opinion been given immunity to implicate Trump, and I am not for Biden or Trump as both have the same zionist controllers.

    1. @ Desert Fox

      The G. Maxwell case is all a psyop, she or a double was brought back to America to bring down Trump and she has in my opinion been given immunity to implicate Trump…

      Psyop it may be, but the universal assumption here that Ghislaine Maxwell “WANTED” to be caught and intends to “BRING DOWN TRUMP” when she is put on trial fails to meet the litmus test.

      Here is the flaw in your logic, the false logic of all those who believe — WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE! — that Ghislaine will bring down Trump.

      In order to bring down Trump, the trial of Maxwell would have to take pace BEFORE THE ELECTION in November. It’s no good if her trial takes place AFTER the election! By that time, Trump would already be in for a second term. So he will then be invulnerable.

      The trial has been delayed until next FEBRUARY.

      Nothing happens in the meantime. There is just the gathering of evidence and the collection of witness statements. How convenient for Trump! He will already be installed in the White House for a second term by the time Ghislaine is put on trial, THREE MONTHS AFTER THE ELECTION!

      Q.E.D.

      1. Trump is too smart to let Ms Maxwell bring him down. He’s taking no chances.

        Nor is Ghislaine going to get 35 years behind bars. The Jewish lesbian judge (Nathan) has already decided that most of the evidence against Ghislaine gathered by the FBI is “inadmissible” in court — because “illegally obtained”.

        Trump will be in the White House for a second term, believe me. And Ms Maxwell will receive a relatively light sentence and be out of prison in no time at all, with millions of $$$ in over 12 banks to enable her to live la dolce vita.

      2. “Judge (((Alison Nathan)))? ruled that Maxwell, 58, will stay behind bars until her trial in July next year for allegedly recruiting girls for Epstein to sexually abuse.”
        Question: Whatever happened the Constitutional right to a speedy trial per Amendment 6 of the current Bill of Rights?
        One answer could be that a more impartial jury could be assembled? Americans are famous for their memory span.
        One whole year in lock up anything can happen in that time span. The imagination runs wild given the prior history of the Federal Judicial system and the Justice Department of the greatest criminal enterprise in history known as the the US Federal Government.
        The Israeli controlled congress, executive and Judicial will pull hell and high water to keep any mention of Israel or the Israeli Mossad out of the Ghislaine judicial process, that is if the process even takes place.

  3. Can you imagine having to wear paper clothes for a year? No matter how soft paper is manufactured, it is still paper, made out of wood pulp. It causes irritation and rashes and is not warm. I feel sorry for Ghislaine. Okay, she recruited under age, slutty little girls to play sex games which they probably enjoyed. They completed their feats in luxurious surroundings and walked away with lots of money. Much better than their usual fare in the back seats of rapper boys’ cars. Anyway, many Muslim men in the USA and Australia have underage wives, as young as 12 years. My mate Naim has 3 wives, which includes one old boiler of 29 years, one at 19 years and the last at 14 years. Australian social welfare are told the younger two are his sisters. And what about me? I was a handsome, blonde haired Nordic boy of 14 years with a 21 year old girlfriend and I had sex with many older women. It did not hurt me and I am now married to a much younger beauty. So, give Ghislaine a break and let her wear the sorts of silks and rayons she is used to wearing. Remember she is not guilty until proven so. I think she is a very sexy woman. The fact that she is supposedly a nymphomaniac does not worry me in the least. She just needs understanding.

    1. Max –

      Good attitude, matey! Faggots and trannies and mudsharks are overlooked – but an older man’s prefernce for younger women arouses disgust…. Go figure… 🤔

  4. @ Towjamicus

    Agreed Sir!

    “The Israeli controlled congress, executive and Judicial will pull hell and high water to keep any mention of Israel or the Israeli Mossad out of the Ghislaine judicial process, that is if the process even takes place.”

    This extreme obvious Israeli operation to control the U.S. Congress, Executive, and Judicial branches of U. S. Government through their agents G Maxwell and J Epstein will never permit any window of information on these perps, including all the perps exposed so far connected to this ultimate crime…..

    Furthermore, not one guilty perp will ever be exposed to the public. U.S. justice will somehow be circumvented and this Novella of violations against the Laws of Nature and the Laws of the Universe will result in more crimes continued to be violated.

    Continued violations against the worlds citizenry; desecration of human values, their morals, aspirations, human rights, the Laws of the U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, the Christian Church, all will be somehow be permitted to be innocuous harmless actions.

    All to protect the current “The Israeli controlled congress, executive and Judicial will pull hell and high water to keep any mention of Israel or the Israeli Mossad out of the Ghislaine judicial process, that is if the process even takes place.”

    Thanks Tomjamicus

    1. This still leaves the question unanswered why the Israelis take the risk to embarrass Trump, who is undoubtedly the most pro-Israel president of American history.

      Perhaps the answer to this conundrum is that there is a feud going on between American Jews, who want to take down Trump because of his domestic right-wing policies, and Israeli Jews, who want to keep Trump because of his pro-Israel policies. The delay of Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial to well after the election may be a move by the Israeli pro-Trump camp.

      Be it as it may, the scene of American politics is entirely dominated by Jews.

    1. Yeah, sure! And you are a good judge of “crap”!

      You are the loonie who told us that Jared Kushner and his wife Ivanka Trump were “brother and sister” involved in an incestuous marriage. Your evidence? None at all. Just a hunch. Because they “looked alike”!

      If anyone’s a crap artist on this site, it’s you!

      Poor Flopot.

      Praise from you is his death sentence. 🙂

      1. Madame Butterfly,

        Don’t judge Barkingdeer by one casual throaway comment, probably made in jest. Most of his comments are not like that. He is a poster who always has something interesting to say. Above all, he is obviously a very nice guy and knows how to keep his cool.

        Unlike you, Madame, who needs a lesson in good manners.

  5. Disagreement is healthy, unless of course a Flat Earth Geocentric comes along and disagrees with Our heliocentrism and that WE do NOT consider to be a healthy thing to do, and when someone comes along and disagrees with Our Vatican Two novus ordo NWO NEO-“Christian”/NEW-“Catholic” daughter of lilith New Age type religious/spiritual worldview and starts saying negative things about the Vat Two novus ordo NWO church and the Vat II ANTI-Christ popes and actually has the brazen audacity to call montini&francis ((( reptilian shape-shifters ))) , that ain’t healthy either and WE catch a cold and get the sniffles.

    WE’RE exquisitely sensitve you know! Sometimes WE like disagreements and debates, sometimes WE do NOT!

    Disagreement is healthy but disagreement of the wrong kind of disagreement is like the ching chong vilus and is DEADLY! 😷

  6. MB
    I wrote an explanation at the time on the Jared and Ivanka fake-news marriage as a possible security arrangement, which billionaires might have some interest in… I think it might have gotten lost somehow…. Their security considerations are, after all, necessarily different from what the common folk might think about… If their marriage is fake, it may not be consummate, and their children might be fake too, like the Obamas… And then there is the apparent fact of inter-breeding among the Rothen Bankster Class, everybody’s heard of that by now… Add to that the Dallas Gold Bug’s revelations about who’s really who in these big bloodlines in control of everything, look at the obviously odd resemblance in the body structures and facial characteristics between Jared and Ivanka and I’m not certain a little conjecture isn’t called for… Sorry to shock anybody, but we are living in a word of huge media hoaxes and fake leaders… Their hoaxes aren’t even very clever most of the time, so transparent… They’ve been unaccountable forever… The Gizzy business doesn’t pass the sniff test either, like this dastardly covid scam….
    SM
    Thanks for the support…
    I don’t take MB’s scathing too seriously… I don’t think she means any real hatred… She can be nice too…

  7. MB is actually very nice except she’s frustrated because she never became a big Hollywood sTaR so she lashes out at everyone. Her acting “career” never got off the ground so all of us have to suffer for it.

    She has “the right” to attack everybody because her dream didn’t come true.

    If her dream of becoming a sTaR had come true she would be very nice to everybody — like Ellen DeGeneres is “kind” to everybody, *grin*. 🙂

  8. Listen Mr.Admin.Bevor you post an article about G. M. first you have to proof and come up with some evidence that G.M.has been arrested. Anything else about her doesn’t matter.what the audience here really want to see is …where is your evidence that she was arrested. Otherwise you just post the same rubbish which comes from the mainstream media.Truth seeker is a good side but they made they same mistake, they couldn’t proof her arrest.Bring me the evidence of here arrest,and I give you the evidence that she lives in Spain at the moment.But first do your home work.By the way I don’t give my evidence cheaply.

    1. @ Premanidhi

      An arrogant little Indian gets snotty with Admin!

      Listen Mr.Admin. Bevor (SIC) you post an article about G. M. first you have to proof (SIC) and come up with some evidence that G.M. has been arrested. Anything else about her doesn’t matter. what the audience here really want to see is …where is your evidence that she was arrested. Otherwise you just post the same rubbish which comes from the mainstream media.

      No sir! You have your logic turned upside down! Admin does not need to prove that Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested, which is universally accepted as the default position by 99.9% of the public. It is YOU who need to prove that Maxwell was NOT arrested, given that you represent a miniscule monority of 0.01%! 🙂

      Truthseeker is a good side (SIC) but they made they (SIC) same mistake, they couldn’t proof (SIC) her arrest.Bring me the evidence of here (SIC) arrest (SIC), and I give you the evidence that she lives in Spain at the moment.

      WOW! You really have mastered the English language! 🙂

      Yes, Truthseeker is a good site (not “side”) and does exactly what the Darkmoon site does: publishes the news. If the mainstream media is hopelessly wrong, you will need to prove that over 10,000 newspapers, magazines and TV networks are all in secret collusion to deceive and misinform the public.

      . . . “She [Maxwell] lives in Spain at the moment . . . By the way I don’t give my evidence cheaply.”

      How convenient for you! How much do you you want for your info? Do you accept Paypal? Or give me your address in India and I will send you a check for 200 rupees (= $2.66) for your precious information.

      This is a generous offer, Prem. It will buy you a pint of beer in Mumbai! 🙂

  9. Will she survive a year in prison? Who would have thought the guards would have fallen asleep during their suicide watch over Epstein? And didn’t his previous cellmate, that jailed cop, try to strangle him? There are many options on the table still, even though she wears paper clothes. How about poison slipped in her food while the cook looks the other way, or the guards going to sleep yet again while the CCTV is turned off … and just about anything can happen. I know twice would be a coincidence but so what? How many enemies have the Clinton’s disposed of so far, including the guy who wrote books about their serial murders?

    1. So it’s true because you read it on the deep web, is it?
      Do you believe everything you hear in the pub?

      1. Sard –

        Rumors from “the pub” could be more reliable than jew Rupert Murdock’s agenda in News.com.au… maybe even by a long shot! 🙂

        “Australia’s number one news site news.com.au reaches over 10m* Australians, delivering extensive breaking news and national interest stories thanks to our team of dedicated journalists plus the strength of the News Corp Australia network.”
        https://www.news.com.au/more-information

        News Corp Australia network:
        News Corp Australia is one of Australia’s largest media conglomerates, employing more than 8,000 staff nationwide and approximately 3,000 journalists. The group’s interests span newspaper and magazine publishing, Internet, subscription television, market research, DVD and film distribution, and film and television production trading assets. News Pty Limited (formerly News Limited) is the holding company of the group.
        The parent company is News Corp.
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_Corp_Australia

        News Corp:
        The current incarnation of News Corporation, stylized as News Corp, is an American mass media and publishing company focusing on newspapers and publishing, formed as a spin-off of the original News Corporation (as founded by Rupert Murdoch in 1980). The company is headquartered in New York City and incorporated in Delaware.
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_Corp_(2013%E2%80%93present)

      2. @ PAT

        Sard – Rumors from “the pub” could be more reliable than jew Rupert Murdock’s agenda in News.com.au… maybe even by a long shot! 🙂

        Good point, Pat. And I would be guilty of a great error if I had praised the Murdoch paper and said: “Brilliant article! Thanks, Rupert!” But I never said that, did I?

        All I did was DEFEND ADMIN’S RIGHT TO PUBLISH THE ARTICLE!

        Do you see the difference?

      3. Admin CANNOT just publish articles from weird fringe sites specializing in conspiracty theories. Articles found on such sites are usually substandard, poor quality, and written by illiterate weirdos. The Darkmoon site’s reputation would suffer if its started catering to people like TROJ and began publishing articles on Flat Earth theory etc etc 🙂

        Apart from which: is it really a crime that Admin should publish an article originally published on Truthseeker? — a respected AltRight site which regularly publishes articles from The Daily Mail, Reuters, the New York Times, Vanity Fair, Forbes?

        I am NOT defending the article on the Australian paper, Pat. I am not praising it. I am simply defending the Darkmoon site’s right to publish mainstream articles in order to stimulate debate. This sometimes means publishing articles which most posters here would find ridiculous. And rightly so. Which is WHY they are posted! To hold them up to ridicule.

        This is what Admin says and I agree with these statements because they make sense:

        # 16. Sources. We make use of both alternative media sources and mainstream sources.

        # 14. This website accepts no responsibility for the views expressed by any of its article writers, with the single exception of Lasha Darkmoon. Though we tend to agree with the broad assumptions of most of the writers we publish, we occasionally publish articles we disagree with strongly. Such articles are published to stimulate discussion and in the interests of free speech, NOT because we approve of them.

        https://www.darkmoon.me/site-policies-and-guidelines/

        Note the bit in bold print, underlined.

      4. Sard –

        Well…. so it seems that Slyblue gave YOU fuel for the discussion/debate YOU relish!! You should be very thankful. 🙂 I presented the facts about the source.

      5. I wasn’t arguing with you, Pat, and I do wish you could avoid making every polite comment I make to you as some kind of secret weapon out to destroy you! I ain’t out to destroy you or diss you, understand? 🙂

        I was simply pointing out that Admin has the right to publish whatever articles it chooses to publish, just like Truthseeker does.

        The only people who object to this are the nutcases who say: “No, you can only publish articles from Conspiracy Theory sites!”

Comments are closed.