The Secret Teachings [*POEM*]

Christian martyrs about to be eaten alive by lions 
in the reign of the Emperor Nero (54-68 AD).

THE  SECRET  TEACHINGS

by Xanadu

“Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.” — Plato

“Three things in human life are important. The first is to be kind. The second is to be kind. And the third is to be kind.” — William James


Kindness and compassion for every creature
In a world of suffering. All pride, lust, hate  
Extinguished forever. Frail human nature
Perfected. All the crooked world made straight.

Let the bird fly free. Mend the broken wing.
Heal the crushed spirit. Give sight to the blind. 
In a world of hideous noises, sing, sing!
Love your enemies. Forgive them. Be kind.

Expect to be spat at and spurned for your pains.
Wipe the spit from your face as they put you in chains. 

44 thoughts to “The Secret Teachings [*POEM*]”

  1. “Love your enemies. Forgive them. Be kind.”

    No. Refer to Ecclesiastes Ch. 1, Verse 8 and all the other verses, too. When you love and show kindness to those who hate you, you are violating the natural order. I see photos and videos of white people prostrating themselves in front of minorities over supposed sins committed against these minorities’ ancestors. Those minorities hate them even more after this kind of self-abasement. Their hate never dies away.

    Love everything? Start with the animals, if you feel a need.

    Happy Yule! Merry Christmas!

      1. @ Wyandotte

        You are entitled to your beautifully expressed opinion of course, but your wisdom is the wisdom of conventional White Nationalism, a shortsighted political viewpoint completely lacking in true spirituality and curdled with the crudest antisemitism.

        Most White Nationalists today follow the banner of Nietzche’s ‘AntiChrist’. They think Christianity is an evil plot concocted by the Jews to throw sand in everyone’s eyes. This is why the White Nationalist movement is now in such a sorry state, all but intellectually bankrupt. This is because, broadly speaking, it has turned its back on its Christian heritage.

        You will often hear the virtues of Adolf Hitler and Nazi ideology praised to the sky on these White Nationalist sites. If not so much in the articles they publish, then certainly in their Comment sections.

        Check out Carolyn Yeager if you have any doubts. Or go to Renegade Tribune, Counter-currents, or to the disreputable Incogman site. The Occidental Observer, the best of these sites under the stewardship of the incomparable Kevin MacDonald, is often let down by its Commentariat and includes among its poster boys the virulent anti-Christian Jew hater Dr William Pierce.

        The Darkmoon site is no exception. Its record is deeply tainted by its past excesses. But it is trying its best, it seems, to make amends for its youthful follies by offering milder perspectives now and by aiming for more moderation and inclusiveness in its output.

        It is trying to make it clear, belatedly, that a white skin is no longer the mandatory entrance ticket to Paradise.

        Who do these myopic White Nationalists want us to worship, after all, apart from Adolf Hitler? Wotan, it seems! They think Christianity needs to be replaced by neo-paganism. That lust is manly and prefarable to chastity, the ultimate sin against the great God Priapus! Their brainless hero is the beer-swilling Viking warrior with his blood-spattered cutlass, storming his way through Christians villages and raping all the nuns cowering in the cellar. Then on to Valhalla for more fun and games!

        Jesus wept.

    1. Wyandotte,
      “Love your enemies.” Just another example of a misenterpretation. As you mentioned. This approach is moronic and counter-productive. If someone has declared himself your enemy and is a danger to yourself, family and possessions the best approach is that person’s immedate extermination. Swift and decisive action. Not just that person. But any male of any age in the enemies family who can later take revenge. To prevent future mischief, the widow should also be dealt with. Remember. Your enemies OWN actions essentially ended his life as well as those close to him. YOU are innocent and did only what was necessary for your survival. With your enemy gone, place some white roses 🌹 on his grave, say a prayer and send him your love. 🤗😘🤠

    2. WYANDOTTE

      “When you love and show kindness to those who hate you, you are violating the natural order.”

      Wise words indeed.

      Violation of the natural order is the greatest sin against the creator. Anyone deliberately violating the natural order will be punished by it. So it is the creators will.

      Anyone trying to convince others to “love and show kindness to those who hate you” is definitely an agent of evil set out for the destruction of goodness and divine creation..

      1. @ 1138
        @ Wyandotte

        WYANDOTTE: ““When you love and show kindness to those who hate you, you are violating the natural order.”

        Wise words indeed.

        Wise words indeed, but not wise enough. Why? Because they falsely assume that Christ was some sort of sissy boy and snowflake who expected every single Christian in he world — 2.5 billion of them — to turn the other cheek and be trampled on like doormats by their enemies. What you and Wyandotte fail to understand is that the history of Europe is the history of the most belligerent nations on earth, with one Christian nation fighting another Christian nation non-stop ever since Constantine made Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire. No European nation ever found itself hampered by the Sermon on tge Mount and its pacifist teachings.

        You conveniently forget that the same Christ who said “LOVE YOUR ENEMIES” also drove the moneychangers out of the temple with physical violence and proclaimed: “I COME NOT TO SEND PEACE BUT A SWORD!”

        You and Wyandotte are Useful Idiots for the Jews who would be only too pleased to see Christianity destroyed. And YOU ARE DOING IT FOR THEM by telling us how rotten Christianity is! Christianity was good enough for St Francis of Assissi and Joan of Arc — for Pascal and Mendel — for Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo — for Mozart and Beethoven — for Tolstoy and Dostoevsky — for Solzhenitsyn and Pastor Bonhoeffer — but it’s not good enough for Wyandotte and 1138! 🙂

        Too bad.

        Good luck to you, my friends, but I don’t think I will join you this Christmas in sneering at the Sermon on the Mount and the traditional moral values of our noble Christian ancestors! Not unless you can produce a better religion of your own! And you have nothing, nothing whatsoever, to satisfy the deeper needs of our children and of the sick and the suffering masses. How would you comfort the dying, you and Wyandotte? What would you whisper into the ears of a suffering soul? Give me an example of YOUR kindness and wisdom! 🙂

        White Nationalism does NOT have the answers. This racist pseudo-religion with its “nigger-hating” Hitler worshippers is ripe for the garbage dump. You White Nationalist degenerates don’t DESERVE a State of your own. Because you failed utterly in keeping America the fine upstanding nation it was in the old days, before you let the Jews into this country in the 1880s and thereafter, allowing them to STEAL AMERICA from under your f***ing noses!

        You DESERVE to lose your country because you didn’t know how to keep it. It’s as simple as that.You have let your country (and MY beloved country) go to the dogs. And now you have a degenerate nation of hedonistic white wankers and dumbed-down village idiot retards bragging about their white skins and blue eyes. Not for much longer it seems. You will soon be submerged in the swamp of multiculturalism. And whose fault is that? Your own! YOU ARE TO BLAME FOR THE DESTRUCTION oF AMERCA by being UNFIT to preserve the potential paradise on earth you once had.

        Shame on you!

      2. @ Manfred

        You are right.
        Arguing with these Christ-bashing legions of the damned is futile.
        They already belong in the Jewish camp but don’t even know it.
        As you say, they are Useful Idiots of the Jews.

      3. MANFRED

        “Not unless you can produce a better religion of your own!”

        I already have / there already is. It’s called National Socialism. It stands for progress. But I understand that is not something you desire.

        Perhaps one day you will take the time to learn about it and shake off your utter cluelessness about it and about Adolf Hitler.

        “And you have nothing, nothing whatsoever, to satisfy the deeper needs of our children and of the sick and the suffering masses”

        Yes, I have, actually. A bright, thriving and prosperous future in which natural, healthy family values and great respect for our earth’s ecosystem are being considered paragon.

        ” and of the sick and the suffering masses.”

        Those suffering masses wouldn’t even exist if it weren’t for your moronic, suicidal Christian ethics.

        BTW, I am not an American.

      4. @ 1138

        Thank you for this revealing comment. You have at last outed yourself as a neo-Nazi moron.

        If you think “Nationalism Socialism” — a euphemism for Nazi ideology of the lowest order — is a “religion”, you belong in a lunatic asylum all of your own.

        The views of Adolf Hitler and how the world should be run are in no way compatible with the teachings of Jesus Christ or indeed with any other great world religion. Nazism is not a “religion”. It is an extremist political cult built on race hatred and the Will to Power. Its founder was a self-deluding megalomaniac who committed suicide.

        No founder of any great religion commits suicide just because he can’t get his way and win a war. The very act of suicide in a bunker is a confession of impotence in the face of defeat.

        You can keep your Hitler. I will keep my Christ.

        Now get off this site, you mentally sick sewer rat.

        Spare us the contamination of your ideological leprosy.

      5. ON HITLER”S HATRED OF CHRISTIANITY

        Hitler himself is reported to have said that he would like to strangle Christ.

        Founders of great religions don’t speak like this.

        Can you imagine Christ or the Buddha working themselves up into a state of hysterical and apoplectic rage before vast audiences? Svengali with a toothbrush moustache and spittle flying!

        Here is Herr Svengali ranting against Christianity: “Taken to its logical extreme, Christianity would mean the systematic cultivation of human failure.” (Hitler’s Table Talk, p.57). Hitler was a coward who abused Christianity in private, among his most trusted associates, but pretended in public to be sympathetic to Christianity. This was a diplomatic ploy. So Hitler was intensely devious, two-faced, and mendacious. He felt no qualms about lying almost constantly. Hardly the quality one expects to see in a charismatic religious leader.

        Here is the Mad Dictator threatening to deal with the Christians “one day” — but only AFTER the War. He couldn’t afford to alienate the vast numbers of German soldiers who believed in Christianity and were fighting for the Christian Germany of their ancestors:

        The evil that is gnawing at our vitals is OUR PRIESTS, OF BOTH CREEDS. I can’t at present give them what they’ve been asking for! … but THE TIME WILL COME WHEN I’LL SETTLE MY ACCOUNT WITH THEM…. THEY’LL HEAR FROM ME ALL RIGHT! I shan’t let myself be hampered…”

        (Hitler in ‘Table Talk’, p.61, 14 Oct. 1941)

      6. MB,

        Mmm, yes I see. Well, not exactly. I don’t really know what NEO-Nazism is. And to call me a National Socialist would be a too great an honour. I cannot compare myself with great men like Himmler, Goering, Goebbels and of course the greatest overman, Adolf Hitler. They were brave National Socialists, who fought the Jew and created the most beautiful country that ever existed.

        I only wish I was alive during that time so I could have joined the Waffen SS. Better to die fighting evil than to live in a world inhabited mostly by clueless morons like you who imagine themselves being ‘goooooooood’ while perpetuating the problem.

        Besides I did mention it in one of my first comments here on Darkmoon. And that was years ago. So I’m afraid you’re a bit late with your ‘discovery’.

        Your comment is also revealing something; that you are way out of your depth here, Madame Butterbutt. Well, actually, not to me of course, I knew that all along 🙂

  2. Saki must be an “intellectual” — because the 2 intellectuals E. Michael Jones and Michael Hoffman would LERV Saki. I just know they would.

    E. Michael Jones and Michael Hoffman are Christian intellectuals. Saki is so overwrought he has to be a jew. Being overwrought is a jewish trait, very much so, and Saki is (((very overwrought))), sayin’.

    1. No, I am not a Jew, dear Joe! Though I freely admit to admiring the wisdom of Solomon and other Jewish sages found in the Old Testament. In this, I fear, I share the same awful prejudices as Lasha Darkmoon, Sister Monica, and Gilbert Huntly!

      As a Christian, however, I naturally prefer the New Testament to the Old Testament. If forced to choose between the Old Testament and the New Testament, when shipwrecked on a desert island, I would definitely opt for the New Testament. This would satisfy all my spiritual needs on the island.

      What about you, Joe? What one inspirational book would you take with you to your desert island if the choice was thrust upon you? Some pre-Copernician tome on Flat Earth theory maybe? 🙂

      1. C’mon Saki, give Joe and Hitler a break. It’s Christmas! Besides, half the lies they tell about Joe and Hitler and me ain’t true..

    2. I hope someone gives Madame a face mask for Christmas 😷. So much sh*t spews out of her mouth every day NON-stop a face DIAPER would help keep the piles of 💩 in. A face DIAPER on Madame would go a LONG way in keeping Darkmoon’s bandwidth space LESS sh*tty and maybe more interesting and maybe even inspiring, at least little bit. Do everyone a favor, put a face mask on, honey.

    1. Many thanks Trad, old friend of my misspent youth!
      A happy Christmas to all others on this site,
      both loving friends and deadly enemies! 🙂

  3. whiddle toby will be getting everything his whiddle heart ever desired tomorrow under the 🎄, Santa will be VERY generous to whiddle toby because whiddle toby is a very good boy, a very good obedient mama’s boy, a kind obedient gentle little boy, his mommy LERVS her always obedient whiddle baby boy… Christmas exists solely to make whiddle toby happy … when he sees all of his presents under the tree he will shout with !GLEE! 😊

    [ *POEM* ]

    “IT’S ALL ABOUT ME… ME ME ME… GIVE ME GIVE ME GIVE ME”

    by : Lord Flauntleroy

    On Christmas morn
    he came downstairs
    from his bedroom
    on the second floor
    of the great big manse!
    the bucolic country estate!
    the ancestral land!
    His mommy’s rich!
    and he is handsome!
    when he walked into the living room
    the Tannebaum 🎄 in the room was a YUGE presence
    He saw Santa left him
    A LOT OF GIFTS, A LOT OF TOYS
    LOTS AND LOTS OF PRESENTS!
    He shouted out and he exclaimed with !GLEE! :
    “Oh Goody!
    Christmas morn is here
    GIVE ME GIVE ME GIVE ME
    IT’S ALL ABOUT ME!
    ME ME ME!
    GIVE ME GIVE ME GIVE ME” 😀

  4. @Saki. You commented, “You are entitled to your beautifully expressed opinion of course, but your wisdom is the wisdom of conventional White Nationalism, a shortsighted political viewpoint completely lacking in true spirituality and curdled with the crudest antisemitism.”

    I am not sure what “white nationalism” entails. It sounds like a political movement rather than a purely cultural one. My point is that no other race sucks up to other races of people or despises its ancestors. Just white people. What other race behaves in this crazy manner? I don’t see what religion has to do with it – white atheists, humanists, liberals, garden-variety conservatives (cucks) , evangelical Christians and Catholic leaders (the pope, for one) all behave toward minorities, especially blacks, as if they were Jesus Christ himself. Think about that. This is not 2000 years ago. The reality is that God sent his only sonThe Christ to get the jews to change their character. He could not have known what was going on in 2020.

    1. Thank you for responding to me so politely, Wyandotte. From what you say in your comment, I think I may have misjudged you. As St Paul says, “We see through a glass darkly.”

      I am myself utterly confused and have no right to find fault with anyone who is, likely myself, seeing through a glass darkly. I think you will see where I am coming from if I tell that I distinguish sharply between “core Christianity”, such as Christ himself uniquely practiced, and the type of corrupt Christianity of evil Popes and organized religion at its worst.

      In defending “Christianity”, I am not defending “Churchianity” or Orthodox dogmatic Christianity or the shocking evils of the Inquisition, I am defending the life and sufferings of Jesus Christ as I imagine them to be. Am I making sense to you? Even Gandhi, who was not a Christian, would read the New Testament with reverence.

      1. The Sermon on the Mount can be a problem, but only if you make it one by taking it too literally. If you understand it correctly, there is no “pathological altruism” here, as the White Nationalists erroneously keep suggesting. No Christian I know has ever taken it literally. No Christian I know, for example, has given all his wealth away to the poor and left himself destitute. No Christian mother I know would stand by and see her children attacked in front of her eyes and do nothing to resist the attacker. She would fight to her death to save her children if she loved them and saw them being raped or murdered.

        As I say, Christians have been at war with each other since Christianity began. The Sermon on the Mount has NEVER served as a deterrent to their testosterone belligerence! The Brits were a Christian nation through and through. How could they have acquired the greatest Empire under the sun if they had let the Sermon on the Mount rule their passions? 🙂

        The Sermon on the Mount was a counsel of perfecton intended only for Christ’s inner circle of disciples. For the Renunciates. It was not intended for the masses. How can EVERY Christian in the World give away his wealth to the poor? It is physically unworkable.

      2. Darwinism and Christianity need to be compatible. And they are. Darwin himself was a good Christian for the first 40 years of his life and his wife was a pious Unitarian Christian. And Darwin was NOT an atheist, he was a self-confessed agnostic with theistic leanings, moving closer to a belief in a Designer God as he grew older — but never quite committing himself to certitude.

        https://www.quotemaster.org/images/30/309b593eca1edbc9974dff75740a08ee.jpg

        He loved his wife, a devout Christian, too much to preach atheism to her. That would have been mental cruelty to her.

        Anyway, Wyandotte, I hope you will forgive me if I have said anything you find it very hard to agree with.

  5. “We are constantly, by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence in these theories… Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism.” (Protocols 2:2-3)

    The jews have long known that if you destroy belief in God, people will cease to fear God and to obey the Ten Commandments. They then become pawns of the jews willing to serve money instead of principle, and carry out iniquities from sexual misdeeds to even murder.
    In the jewish propaganda arsenal, the greatest tool for destroying faith in God has been Darwin’s theory of evolution. His theory eliminated God and presented life as a struggle for survival of the fittest. It was the necessary ingredient for the acceptance of a slave state, and of a cycle of crime, violence, destruction, anarchy, revolutions and wars.Darwinism is the Satanic Ideal Behind Abortion

    You know, every blood-thirty war, the abortion industry, genocide, eugenics and mass-murdering psychopath dictators, all began with a peaceful ideal. Darwinism’s Godless philosophies were expressed through peaceful books, mere words penned on paper. Yet, when adopted by a living monster, like Russian dictator Joseph Stalin, 60 million innocent people were murdered between 1930-1950 in the Russian Gulags (work camps were millions were sent to labour under brutal conditions to build Stalin’s numerous projects).

    The ruthless Soviet Union of Russia was one of the most feared tormentors and killers of people in history. Yet, according to statistics, there are 117,000,000 missing persons in the U.S. today because of abortion (more than all the innocent people brutally murdered by the Soviet Union.

    Darwin, Admitted that Evolution is a Fraud.

    https://youtu.be/L74bwppgS-o

    1. Saki is “is not a jew, he’s a NON-jew” and my whoodle doodle “is not a canine, he’s a NON-canine, maybe my whoddle doodle is ‘really’ ‘a feline, a cat’, who knows ‘it’s a mystery we’ll never be able to figure out'”, 🤔. lol……

  6. I have to agree with Donaldo and Wyandotte here. There is a time for war. With the recent communist attack on our Constitution and our President recently I felt that somehow this short Christmas story video was appropriate for this Christmas . Please forgive the poetic license, but taking care of business can be a brutal affair at times. There do come times to “sell your cloak and buy a sword”. God Bless you all. Soli Deo Gloria.

    And if there is one speck of doubt I would ask you to read the history of the 1917 Communist Revolution in Russia.

    https://youtu.be/SQtFtyrZ-IA

    .

    1. I never met a pacifist that does not rely on the sword. They call the police who are armed to protect life limb and assets through taxes. In South Africa the libral pasificts have security companies armed to the teeth to do what they reject. Even the bible says the goverment bares the sword. You rely on Government who bares the sword to reclaim your debts. You call the police funded by tax dollars of liberal hypocrites and the rest. In South Africa we have a contagion of liberal hypocrites all have security fences and armed response to do exactly what they are not willing to do for themselves. The goverment of some nations ruled by the natural will of the people allowed for the protection of person and property by law. All governments are violent if threatened. Christianity misses the obvious in quoting the gospels of tenderness to all men. It was always speaking to Jews whose law demanded an eye for an eye Lex Talionis.
      In the movie Ben Hur the Arab says to Charltan Heston: As long as all men are not like you we must keep our swords sharp. He or they that bare the sword rule ask any terrorist organization. There is a time for war and a season for peace. Thanks all.

      1. Srila Prabhupada – “Just like Gandhi, “Saintly statesman.” He is recorded, “Saintly statesman.” He’s a statesman, politician, but he was introducing some morality, non-violence, like that. Actually, his philosophy failed. He wanted Hindu-Muslim unity, but it was divided. The Muslim and Hindu divided. He wanted non-violence. He died out of violence. Therefore all his philosophy failed. And Indian independence was achieved not by Gandhi’s non-violence method but (by) Subhas Bose’s violence method. And he wanted to explain nonviolence from Bhagavad-gītā. Just see, another foolishness. Bhagavad-gītā is spoken in the battlefield, and he was screwing some meaning to prove his nonviolence.”

        “In fact, Gandhi prolonged the Colonialism by promoting his non-violence, and the British were very smart in letting him do so.”

  7. Unless we know the meaning and value of suffering, we don’t know the meaning of life. The Mysterium Crucis and Mysterium iniquitatis only find their meaning in the redemptive, sacrificial value of the Cross and glorious Resurrection of Jesus Christ.

    As for the Person of Jesus Christ, most of us have only been given a caricature of Him. Here is something readers here may find enlightening. The book itself made a great impact on me when I was in my mid-20s. It can be found online.

    Archbishop Fulton J Sheen, The Life of Christ (1954)
    THE ONLY PERSON EVER PRE-ANNOUNCED

    History is full of men who have claimed that they came from God, or that they were gods, or that they bore messages from God—Buddha, Mohammed, Confucius, Christ, Lao-tze, and thousands of others, right down to the person who founded a new religion this very day. Each of them has a right to be heard and considered. But as a yardstick external to and outside of whatever is to be measured is needed, so there must be some permanent tests available to all men, all civilizations, and all ages, by which they can decide whether any one of these claimants, or all of them, are justified in their claims. These tests are of two kinds: reason and history. Reason, because everyone has it, even those without faith; history, because everyone lives in it and should know something about it.

    Reason dictates that if any one of these men actually came from God, the least thing that God could do to support His claim would be to pre-announce His coming. Automobile manufacturers tell their customers when to expect a new model. If God sent anyone from Himself, or if He came Himself with a vitally important message for all men, it would seem reasonable that He would first let men know when His messenger was coming, where He would be born, where He would live, the doctrine He would teach, the enemies He would make, the program He would adopt for the future, and the manner of His death. By the extent to which the messenger conformed with these announcements, one could judge the validity of his claims.

    Reason further assures us that if God did not do this, then there would be nothing to prevent any impostor from appearing in history and saying, “I come from God,” or “Anangel appeared to me in the desert and gave me this message.” In such cases there would be no objective, historical way of testing the messenger. We would have only his word for it, and of course he could be wrong.

    If a visitor came from a foreign country to Washington and said he was a diplomat, the government would ask him for his passport and other documents testifying that he represented a certain government. His papers would have to antedate his coming. If such proofs of identity are asked from delegates of other countries, reason certainly ought to do so with messengers who claim to have come from God. To each claimant reason says, “What record was there before you were born that you were coming?” With this test one can evaluate the claimants. (And at this preliminary stage, Christ is no greater than the others.) Socrates had no one to foretell his birth. Buddha had no one to pre-announce him and his message or tell the day when he would sit under the tree. Confucius did not have the name of his mother and his birthplace recorded, nor were they given to men centuries before he arrived so that when he did come, men would know he was a messenger from God. But, with Christ it was different. Because of the Old Testament prophecies, His coming was not unexpected. There were no predictions about Buddha, Confucius, Lao-tze, Mohammed, or anyone else; but there were predictions about Christ. Others just came and said, “Here I am, believe me.” They were, therefore, only men among men and not the Divine in the human. Christ alone stepped out of that line saying, “Search the writings of the Jewish people and the related history of the Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, and Romans.” (For the moment, pagan writings and even the Old Testament may be regarded only as historical documents, not as inspired works.)

    It is true that the prophecies of the Old Testament can be best understood in the light of their fulfillment. The language of prophecy does not have the exactness of mathematics. Yet if one searches out the various Messianic currents in the Old Testament, and compares the resulting picture with the life and work of Christ, can one doubt that the ancient predictions point to Jesus and the kingdom which he established?
    God’s promise to the patriarchs that through them all the nations of the earth would be blessed; the prediction that the tribe of Juda would be supreme among the other Hebrew tribes until the coming of Him Whom all nations would obey; the strange yet undeniable fact that in the Bible of the Alexandrian Jews, the Septuagint, one finds clearly predicted the virgin birth of the Messias; the prophecy of Isaias 53 about the patient sufferer, the Servant of the Lord, who will lay down his life as a guilt-offering for his people’s offenses; the perspectives of the glorious, everlasting kingdom of the House of David—in whom but Christ have these prophecies found their fulfillment? From an historical point of view alone, here is uniqueness which sets Christ apart from all other founders of world religions. And once the fulfillment of these prophecies did historically take place in the person of Christ, not only did all prophecies cease in Israel, but there was discontinuance of sacrifices when the true Paschal Lamb was sacrificed.

    Turn to pagan testimony. Tacitus, speaking for the ancient Romans, says, “People were generally persuaded in the faith of the ancient prophecies, that the East was to prevail, and that from Judea was to come the Master and Ruler of the world.” Suetonius, in his account of the life of Vespasian, recounts the Roman tradition thus, “It was an old and constant belief throughout the East, that by indubitably certain prophecies, the Jews were to attain the highest power.”

    China had the same expectation; but because it was on the other side of the world, it believed that the great Wise Man would be born in the West. The Annals of the Celestial Empire contain the statement:

    In the 24th year of Tchao-Wang of the dynasty of the Tcheou, on the 8th day of the 4th moon, a light appeared in the Southwest which illumined the king’s palace. The monarch, struck by its splendor, interrogated the sages. They showed him books in which this prodigy signified the appearance of the great Saint of the West whose religion was to be introduced into their country.

    The Greeks expected Him, for Aeschylus in his Prometheus six centuries before His coming, wrote, “Look not for any end, moreover, to this curse until God appears, to accept upon His Head the pangs of thy own sins vicarious.”

    How did the Magi of the East know of His coming? Probably from the many prophecies circulated through the world by the Jews as well as through the prophecy made to the Gentiles by Daniel centuries before His birth.

    Cicero, after recounting the sayings of the ancient oracles and the Sibyls about a “King whom we must recognize to be saved,” asked in expectation, “To what man and to what period of time do these predictions point?” The Fourth Eclogue of Virgil recounted the same ancient tradition and spoke of “a chaste woman, smiling on her infant boy, with whom the iron age would pass away.”

    Suetonius quoted a contemporary author to the effect that the Romans were so fearful about a king who would rule the world that they ordered all children born that year to be killed—an order that was not fulfilled, except by Herod.

    Not only were the Jews expecting the birth of a Great King, a Wise Man and a Savior, but Plato and Socrates also spoke of the Logos and of the Universal Wise Man “yet to come.” Confucius spoke of “the Saint” the Sibyls, of a “Universal King” the Greek dramatist, of a savior and redeemer to unloose man from the “primal eldest curse.” All these were on the Gentile side of the expectation. What separates Christ from all men is that first He was expected; even the Gentiles had a longing for a deliverer, or redeemer.
    This fact alone distinguishes Him from all other religious leaders.

    A second distinguishing fact is that once He appeared, He struck history with such impact that He split it in two, dividing it into two periods: one before His coming, the other after it. Buddha did not do this, nor any of the great Indian philosophers. Even those who deny God must date their attacks upon Him, A.D . so and so, or so many years after His coming.

    A third fact separating Him from all the others is this: every other person who ever came into this world came into it to live. He came into it to die. Death was a stumbling block to Socrates—it interrupted his teaching. But to Christ, death was the goal and fulfillment of His life, the gold that He was seeking. Few of His words or actions are intelligible without reference to His Cross. He presented Himself as a Savior rather than merely as a Teacher. It meant nothing to teach men to be good unless He also gave them the power to be good, after rescuing them from the frustration of guilt.

    The story of every human life begins with birth and ends with death. In the Person of Christ, however, it was His death that was first and His life that was last. The scripture describes Him as “the Lamb slain as it were, from the beginning of the world.” He was slain in intention by the first sin and rebellion against God. It was not so much that His birth cast a shadow on His life and thus led to His death; it was rather that the Cross was first, and cast its shadow back to His birth. His has been the only life in the world that was ever lived backward. As the flower in the crannied wall tells the poet of nature, and as the atom is the miniature of the solar system, so too, His birth tells the mystery of the Cross. He went from the known to the known, from the reason of His coming manifested by His name “Jesus” or “Savior” to the fulfillment of His coming, namely, His death on the Cross.

    John gives us His eternal prehistory; Matthew, His temporal prehistory, by way of His genealogy. It is significant how much His temporal ancestry was connected with sinners and foreigners! These blots on the escutcheon of His human lineage suggest a pity for the sinful and for the strangers to the Covenant. Both these aspects of His compassion would later on be hurled against Him as accusations: “He is a friend of sinners” “He is a Samaritan.” But the shadow of a stained past foretells His future love for the stained. Born of a woman, He was a man and could be one with all humanity; born of a Virgin, who was overshadowed by the Spirit and “full of grace,” He would also be outside that current of sin which infected all men.

    Christianity, unlike any other religion in the world, begins with catastrophe and defeat. Sunshine religions and psychological inspirations collapse in calamity and wither in adversity. But the Life of the Founder of Christianity, having begun with the Cross, ends with the empty tomb and victory.

  8. I spent 12 long years in Catholic school and was taught that the early Christians were eaten by lions. The nuns impressed on me Christianity was an upward fight against Paganism from the get go. But is that true?

    Then I read Caesar’s Messiah by Joseph Atwill who proves that Rome wrote the early Gospels. Atwill says the Gospels were written primarily by Josephus, a Jewish scholar, who was caught in the war in Judea. After Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD, Titus took Josephus back to Rome, and he wrote his famous books, an autobiography and Josephus took the Emperor’s last name, and he became a Flavian and lived in the lap of luxury.
    That is not what I was taught about the early Christian Gospel writers living in poverty and on the run.

    So if Josephus Flavian is the author of Christianity, who wrote the myth for Rome, then why were early Christians thrown to the lions? That doesn’t make sense and sounds like fake history. Later Rome adopts Christianity as the official state religion which eventually becomes the Catholic Church. Atwill explains that the Pope’s official name Pontifex Maximus is exactly the same as the Roman Caesar title. Thus the Roman State morphed into the Catholic Church, there was no opposition to Christianity ever.

    1. @ (((Yukon Jack)))

      “I spent 12 long years in Catholic school and was taught that the early Christians were eaten by lions. The nuns impressed on me Christianity was an upward fight against Paganism from the get go. But is that true?”

      I, too, went to a Catholic school. Run by deeply devout Belgian nuns. I had no reason (unlike you) to jump to hatefully hostile conclusions about my admirable Catholic mentors. They were unfailingly good to me, did not abuse me ever, and, unlike you, I felt no need to stab them in the back after all the kindness they had lavished on me.

      “Then I read ‘Caesar’s Messiah’ by Joseph Atwill who proves that Rome wrote the early Gospels. Atwill says the Gospels were written primarily by Josephus, a Jewish scholar, who was caught in the war in Judea…That is not what I was taught about the early Christian Gospel writers living in poverty and on the run.”

      Unlike you, I find no compelling reason to give credence to the conspiracy theory claptrap of an obscure nonentity called “Joseph Atwill”. Why would I wish believe a word issuing from the mouth of this conspiracy theory halfwit?

      Unlike you, I am not impressed by Atwill’s uneducated, ill-informed, and unsourced assertions allegedly promulgated by a Jewish “historian” called Josephus.

      “So if Josephus Flavian is the author of Christianity, who wrote the myth for Rome, then why were early Christians thrown to the lions?

      But Josephus is NOT the author of Christianity, any more than Newton and Einstein are the authors of Flat Earth theory. So the question does not arise. 🙂

      “That doesn’t make sense and sounds like fake history.

      The views of Atwill and his alleged “source”, Josephus, are indeed fake history. These same hackneyed “opinions” — NOT FACTS — can be found on dozens of conspiracy theory sites run by Jews. The fact that you should channel this intellectually putrid Jewish claptrap on this website tells me all I need to know about you. You are either a Jew yourself or a useful idiot for the Jews.

      In future, I will refer to you as (((“Yukon Jackoff”))). Since you have been widely accused of being a sexual pervert from Tel Aviv who likes jacking off in public. Even your photo has been published on this website, so we all know what you (supposedly) look like, you disgusting little perv!

      https://www.topbestpics.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/funny-ugly-people-pics-9.jpg

      Advice to ADMIN and all other posters:

      Email this picture of Yukon Jack to all other websites, including Truthseeker, where this creepy Christ-hating Jewish stalker and sexual pervert attacks Lasha Darkmoon openly and threatens to rape her.

      1. Is Madame Butterfly telling the truth about Yukon Jack? Is that really his ugly face in the photo? And is he really a sexual pervert from Tel Aviv?

        The answer is: I don’t know.

        All I know is that this is not the first time I have heard these toxic rumors about Yukon Jack. I have read these stories about him several times, both here and on other websites. One such comment, by an ex-FBI agent who calls himself “Troll Watcher”, appeared on this website only a week or two ago. I’m afraid Yukon Jack has a very dark and dodgy reputation. Everything he says needs to be treated as systematic disinfo and black propaganda for the Jewish deep state.

        If Yukon Jack thinks he has every right to defecate on Jesus Christ whenever and wherever he wants, why shouldn’t Madame Butterfly claim equal rights to defecate on Yukon Jack whenever and wherever she wants?

        What is sauce for the goose, is sauce for the gander.

    2. @ 1138

      I find your comments too boring to read, you tiresome little man. Why don’t you go away and jerk off on some porn site, as Manfred has just suggested?

      All Hitler’s comments are sourced from HITLER’S OWN WORDS on Hitler’s Table Talk. They reveal him to be the Ultimate Asshole and Dickhead, a megalomaniacal mass murderer who deserved to die as he did, like a drowning rat in a swilling cesspool.

      Sic semper tyrannis!

      I see no reason why everyone on this site should be under obligation to join in your mutual masturbation circle, all jerking off in unison over Adolf Hitler like sex-crazed demoniacs.

      1. MADAME BUTTERBUTT

        “I find your comments too boring to read”

        Oh really? Is that why you keep stalking me, then, eh?

        “Why don’t you go away and jerk off on some porn site, as Manfred has just suggested?”

        It’s always that with you lot, isn’t it?

        Porn, Porn, Porn. Jerk off, jerk off, jerk off. You and those other ((( sorry sacks of shit ))) really are, apart from being utterly transparant, obsessed with that, eh? Not surprisingly.

        “They reveal him to be the Ultimate Asshole and Dickhead, a megalomaniacal mass murderer who deserved to die as he did, like a drowning rat in a swilling cesspool.”

        In your state of hysterical mouth foaming hatred against yet another saviour of mankind you forgot to mention one. That he deserves to be boiled in excrement in hell for eternity.

      2. 1138

        You don’t impress me at all, sir.
        I see you as just as a wanker in your Mom’s basement.
        Once a wanker, always a wanker.

      3. MADAME BUTTERBUTT

        “You don’t impress me at all, sir.”

        Well, apparantly I’m not too boring for you to read my comments after all, eh? Otherwise how could you be unimpressed? Please elaborate on that. Oh, on second thought, don’t bother. There’s no one to care about it.

        But anyway, I suspect the opposite. Because it didn’t take me very long to expose ((( you ))), and those ((( other two ))) as genuine Hitler haters, did it?

        You see, it’s just a simple matter of possibilities. You and these other 2 worthless posers either all have an incredible Goyische Kopf for actually NOT knowing the truth about WWII, Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich and what it stood for, and instead are still touting all that jewish inversion of history. And in this day and age!? When there is an abundance of information available?? ….. OR ….. you are ((( )))’s. I strongly suspect the latter possibility, because one of ((( you ))) actually referred to Carolyn Yeager’s website as being neo nazi hate disinfo???? This is a VERY strong indication of at least that Saki character being a Jew. Because that is an EXCELLENT available source of truth, as there are many like that. But truth is something the likes of ((( you ))) HATE, right?

        Aaahh, aahh, didn’t see that one coming, eh? 🙂 Pphhew, amateurs.

        BTW ‘Madame Butterfly’ actually sounds like something some jewish tranny queer pervert would use as a stage, or forum name, seriously. Your ( all 3 of you ) constant referring to ‘wanking’, ‘porn’ and ‘jerking off’ tells us what’s on your mind, alright. No need for guessing there.

        Want to see someone telling truth, eh??

        No, it’s not Put-on, kissing jew ass and inviting them into Russia. Watch and learn.

        https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/the-international-clique-adolf-hitler_9wjJlx7YOB3fl8e.html

    3. YUKON JACK

      It’s an awful long time ago and nobody will dispute the distortion of reality that has never been absent from day 1. Perhaps the Christians were thrown to the lions for being terrorists comparable with today’s ISIS-like cults. The Roman authorities were brutal – not like the wishy washy protectors of criminals of today – when it came to punishing criminals.

      But who really knows what happened for sure? Precisely, no one. And indeed, this narrative could very well just be Christian propaganda. That’s actually very likely.

  9. Yesterday had to be THE WORST Christmas day in the whole history of Darkmoon. Saki and Madame took over the Christmas commentary threads and proceeded to destroy any Christmas happiness. They couldn’t wait until after Christmas to dump their neurosis on Darkmoon, no, they had to dump their unhappiness on everyone on Christmas day. Very selfish, the both of them.

    Being a ‘good Christian’ means you have to over react and go berserk and make everyone’s Christmas miserable just because somebody said one little good thing about Hitler. Being a ‘good Christian’ means acting just like crazy neurotic paranoid jews act when anyone mentions the name ‘Hitler’. I don’t understand it, but then again I’m not a NEO so I’m not into Nostra Aetate — I am NOT favorably impressed with Nostra Aetate.

    Montini was a jew, so was Cardinal Bea. TWO jews from Hell itself. There’s NOTHING about the Vatican Two Church I’m favorably impressed with. Nostra Aetate is full of LIES and jew bullsh*t. Everything about Vat Two Church is a FALSITY — including Nostra Aetate.

    Actually, being a good Christian means REJECTING Nostra Aetate for the jew bullsh*t it is. Nostra Aetate is a FALSITY. Yet another Vatican Two FALSITY.

    1. Exactly Joe!
      “Furthermore, in her rejection of every persecution against any man, the Church, mindful of the patrimony she shares with the Jews and moved not by political reasons but by the Gospel’s spiritual love, decries hatred, persecutions, displays of anti-Semitism, directed against Jews at any time and by anyone.” https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_nostra-aetate_en.html
      As the churches own Christian flock continues to be slapped continuously by “Love (and give to) your asylum seeking non christian neighbors” or is diverted helplessly to the evangelical church of Mammon, Mother Church herself could not care less about her own flock while the money changers that once were driven from the temple are now managing the “investments” of the “soooo spiritual” Vatican while having “Mother by her golden balls”. The once great riches of the shared patrimonial and spiritual past has gone kosher instantly and big times. The Zentralrat’s international script sticks out like a pimple on a dogs rear.
      “As the Church, like a mother, condemns most severely injustices committed against innocent people everywhere, so she raises her voice in loud protest against all wrongs done to Jews, whether in the past or in our time. Whoever despises or persecutes this people does injury to the Catholic Church.”
      Black is the new white and good is the new evil. Not a type of mother that an innocent child of Christ deserves.

  10. Your poem resonates deeply in my heart. I glanced through the comments and felt pain and wondered how could there not be any other response than an opening of the heart for words so masterfully manipulated to render us to do the only thing we can do or be in every instance. The tests become greater to demonstrate to ourselves how we each have transformed and are transitioning to a heart centered world. How exciting! How exilharating it feels to me. That all we need to be is a choice… free willI choose kindness… thank you!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *