SOURCE: US and Israel clash over attack on Iran
With added commentary by Lasha Darkmoon

“Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.”
— Israeli General Moshe Dayan

American-Israeli relations have not been so bright recently…

That’s good. The worse this relationship gets, the better it is for America. Americans do not benefit by good relations with Israel.

Two points can be taken as self-evident and axiomatic:

(1) All wars waged at the behest of American Jewry on Israel’s behalf are wars of disaster that can in no way be regarded as beneficial to America. The shameful fiasco in Iraq and the spectacular defeat of America in Afghanistan (its new Vietnam) are obvious examples. American Jewry is one hundred percent to blame for these disasters. Pay no attention to the ad hominem slur that this self-evident truth is an “anti-Semitic canard.” That won’t wash any longer. 

(2) The more obvious it becomes that American foreign policy is being run by American Jews in Israel’s interests, to the detriment of America, the clearer it will  become that America has fallen under foreign domination, i.e., that it has become a Jewish colony.

The visit of a top Obama administration official was supposed to ease tensions between the countries, but instead it might have only widened the gap regarding attitudes toward the Iranian nuclear problem.

President Obama’s National Security Adviser Tom Donilon arrived in Israel this week and sat with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for two hours to warn Israel against any unilateral attack on Iran. According to the Israeli news outlet Debka, however, this message didn’t sit well with the hawkish leader.

To military sources that have spoken to Debka, Netanyahu is believed to be upset that the US is willing to work with Iran in terms of a possible nuclear program, giving them the go-ahead as long as they promise to avoid enrichment that will lead to them developing nukes. Iran has long insisted that any nuclear related efforts are in the work for energy procurement, although the US and Israel have been called this into question.

Iran is abiding by international law. It is allowed to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. If Israel attacks Iran preemptively and kills Iranians in the process, without a shred of evidence that Iran is building nuclear warheads, this would be a major war crime.

The Obama administration has so far avoided any military action against Iran, hoping instead that international sanctions and strong words will serve as enough of a warning to keep Tehran from working on warheads. Netanyahu, on the other hand, is not convinced. He is not willing to wait for an optimistic outcome and doesn’t rule out a strike on Iran.

Netanyahu’s behavior has all the hallmarks of mental instability. He is acting like a paranoid. He has no rational grounds for attacking Iran. His own nation is already guilty of carrying out numerous covert acts of terrorism within Iran, such as the assassination of Iranian scientists and the creation of the Struxnet virus. Iran has not retaliated to any of these blatant provocations. It has behaved with exemplary restraint. The US loses all credibility if it cuddles up to Israel, a country engaged in international terrorism and hell-bent on starting World War III.

Last month, Deputy Prime Minister Moshe Yaalon explicitly called the Obama administration “hesitant” in their unwillingness to attack, which was followed by a warning only a day later by the nation’s Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, in which he urged the US to “move from words to deeds.”

Why should the US be asked to bomb Iran on Israel’s behalf? Is there any reason why American lives should be sacrificed for Israeli ones?  Why the glib assumption that Jews living in apartheid Israel, a major violator of international law, should automatically receive the benefits of American protection? Why does America need to bring on itself the opprobrium of the rest of the world by allowing itself to be the unpaid bodyguard of this international pariah of a nation?

Lately, however, the US is relying less on threats in terms of taking down a weapons program and more on the hope that Iran will keep their word that the nuclear enrichment program there won’t be used for a warhead. According to the latest reports to the media made by American officials close to the matter, a US strike on Iran is currently not on the cards.

That’s as it should be. If the US attacked Iran right now, we would be entitled to ask: “America, have you gone crazy? Why did you attack an innocent country that has started no wars for 300 years?” 

Will your answer be: “Oh, we couldn’t help it! Our Jewish Masters in Tel Aviv told us we had to do it! They call the shots, you know! We’re under AIPAC’s thumb and must do their bidding!”  

Following the recent, nearly unprecedented deployment of Iranian warships into the Mediterranean Sea, Israel appears closer than ever in coming down hard on Iran. US Joint Chiefs of Staff Commander Gen. Martin E. Dempsey warned CNN this week that an attack at anytime soon simply wouldn’t be “prudent.”

“A strike at this time would be destabilizing and wouldn’t achieve their long-term objectives,” Gen. Dempsey cautioned to CNN host Fareed Zakaria. “I wouldn’t suggest…that we’ve persuaded them that our view is the correct view and that they are acting in an ill-advised fashion,” added Dempsey.

The Israelis ARE acting in an ill-advised fashion. It’s good of General Dempsey to point this out — to  state the obvious. It follows: If  the Israelis attack Iran unilaterally and behave in an “ill-advised” fashion, the US is under no obligation to support Israel or come to its rescue in the event of Tel Aviv or the Dimmona  nuclear facility being attacked by Iranian super missiles. 

The US is now hoping that as other countries sign on to deter a nuclear program, Iran will throw in the towel. To Bloomberg Business Week, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak shared similar thoughts, noting, “I think there is consensus in most capitals of the world that Iran should not be allowed to turn into a nuclear military power.”

Rubbish! There is no such consensus. Common sense tells us that if Israel, the most hated nation in the world in all international polls, is allowed to have nuclear weapons, Iran should be allowed to have them too — if only as a means of defense against a bloodthirsty and dangerous enemy that never ceases to threaten it with nuclear devastation.

I go so far as to say: Iran ought to have nuclear weapons. The sooner the better! The useful doctrine of MAD — mutually assured destruction — would then give stability to the region. Israel would think twice of behaving like the bully on the block if it knew it would receive a bloody nose in the process.

Ask yourself a simple question: Which of these two statements would you regard as the true one: (a) The world would be a safer place if Israel had nuclear weapons and Iran had none. (b) The world would be a safer place if Iran had nuclear weapons and Israel had none.

The world would indisputably be a safer place if Iran had the nuclear weapons instead of Israel. It would be an even safer place if the entire Middle East were a nuclear-free zone.

The sad fact is, the people who run the New World Order don’t want a safe world. They want a dangerous world. How can the Military Industrial Complex prosper and enrich Warmongers Inc. if the world is a safe place?

In order for Little Israel to become Greater Israel, there must be huge territorial adjustments. Land must change hands. Such territorial adjustments invariably occur after every major war, as after WW-I and WW-II.

In order for Israel to expand and get itself more Lebensraum, stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates, a major world war is essential. Desperately short of water, Israel has cast its covetous eye on South Lebanon (to start with) and has made plans to occupy this entire region up to the Litani River. This is the next big land grab: South Lebanon. So Israel is hell-bent on precipitating World War III in pursuit of its perennial dream: a great empire in the Middle East, Pax Judaica, under the rulership of the same Ashkenazi Jews who dominate America, Canada, Europe and Australia right now.

Jewish world domination is very much on the cards. It’s been on the cards for two thousand years — ever since Jesus Christ was nailed to the Cross. It’s now getting nearer than ever. 

As I explained in my dialogue/discussion with Israel Shamir earlier this year: “The Jews took over America and turned it into a Jewish colony. As simple as that. If they’re smart enough to take over America, as they have demonstrably done, why shouldn’t they proceed to the next logical step and take over the world — yes, dominate the world through America? No one denies this is America’s aim: full-spectrum dominance. So if the Jews control America, and if America controls the world, doesn’t it follow logically that the Jews control the world? The logic is irrefutable…. You could say the wild-eyed dreams of the Protocols have at last been realized, but not in the way their original masterminds intended.” (See here)

Last week, US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Ronald Burgess said Iran will not start the war in the Middle East, unless, of course, the US acts first.

“Iran can close the Strait of Hormuz at least temporarily, and may launch missiles against United States forces and our allies in the region if it is attacked,” Burgess explained this week to a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing. “Iran could also attempt to employ terrorist surrogates worldwide. However, the agency assesses Iran is unlikely to initiate or intentionally provoke a conflict,” he added.

True. Iran will NOT attack first. It would be suicide for it to do so. But if Iran is attacked first, it has every right to defend itself by closing the Straits of Hormuz and of attacking its aggressors. Self-defense needs no defense.

Israel, it would seem, is not as willing to wait for that outcome and could very well clash with Iran before the US makes up its mind.

Let Israel attack Iran if it wishes to act like the proverbial “mad dog” so beloved of Israeli General Moshe Dayan. And let it, like all mad dogs, take the consequences of its actions. We all know what happens to mad dogs in the end.

If Iran counter-attacks Israel and inflicts heavy damages on it with its inter-continental missiles, Israel may well respond by nuking Tehran, causing the death of hundreds of thousands of people and the mass contamination of the country with radioactive fallout lasting for centuries. This would be a flagrant war crime. Russia would then be within its rights to spring to the defense of its ally Iran and give Israel a taste of its own medicine.

This would inevitably lead to WW-III if America should be foolish enough to come to Israel’s rescue as it suffered the consequences of its own criminality.

Israel is a thorn in the flesh of the Middle East. It is a thorn in the flesh of America. The sooner America realizes that Israel is a grave liability rather than an asset, the better. The day may come when America, or some other great power, may be forced to obliterate Israel in the interests of world peace.

Once it is perceived that Israel is a country of “mad dogs”, suffering from a collective pathology akin to rabies, there may be no other alternative but to destroy it.

Heaven forbid that it should ever come to this! There can be no excuse for genocidal violence — violence that would make Holocaust 1 look like a children’s picnic in comparison. So it is up to Israel to clean up its act and take steps to make itself less hated. Right now it is the most hated nation in the world. It also tops all polls in being regarded as the greatest threat to world peace.

Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin gloats over the prospects of Jewish world domination. Is he guilty of an “anti-Semitic canard”? Or did he gets his “conspiracy theory” ideas from reading  The Protocols of the Elders of Zion?

“Forty percent of the world’s Jews,” we are told in this somewhat dubious article, “now reside in Israel. A well-placed missile or two and you’ve gotten rid of 7,848,800 people — approximately 5,865,300 of them Jews. Hitler will be high-fiving from the seventh circle of Hell.”

The writer goes on to argue, I think unconvincingly, that the state of Israel was deliberaely established with malign and sinister intent by an elite cabal of Jew Haters. Having persuaded as many Jews as possible to relocate to Israel, these implacable anti-Semites would have the bulk of Jewry just where they wanted them: in one convenient and very restricted location. And then they would nuke them. Finish them all off in five minutes. Pfoof! no more Jews. Jewish Problem solved. (See here)

Any virulently anti-Semitic world dictator, determined on a total extermination of the Jews, would be unlikely to succeed. This is because Jews live everywhere. In every single nation. The entire population of the world, you could say, are the Jews’ hostages.

Such a dictator, if sufficiently mad, would probably opt to nuke particular areas of the world in which there were exceptionally high concentrations of Jews. Bombing Israel comprehensively would account for the disappearance of almost 6 million Jews. Tel Aviv alone has 2.5 million Jews, followed by Haifa with its 655,000 Jews.

Our Mad Dictator, in order to pursue his extermination policy more effectively, would then have to bomb New York, which contains almost 2 million Jews — the second largest concentration of Jews in the world. Los Angeles would have to be  next on his hit list. This contains almost as many Jews as Haifa: 621,000. (See here)

Is it irresponsible to discuss the possible extermination of the Jews? I guess it would be if that is what we were advocating. On the contrary, we are stating that such a hypothetical scenario involving Jewish extermination must be avoided at all costs. We don’t want this to happen. We therefore need a world in which Israel, in its own interests, must learn to practice the utmost self-restraint. The onus is on Israel to make itself more loved. Or less hated. It must cease its warmongering. It must cease trying to inveigle America into new wars on its behalf. Its bloodthirsty cries for an attack on Iran must cease.

At once.

The Jewish warmongers in America, the dual citizens beating the war drums for an attack on Iran, are guilty of incitement to violence. They are already guilty of major war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq. These American Jews, and the Shabbat goy gentiles (like Hillary Clinton) who dance attendance on them like puppets on a string, need to be rounded up and indicted as war criminals.

And if found guilty, they need to be put in front of a firing squad.

The perpetrators of 9/11 are still at large. These killers need to be brought to justice without delay. If they are allowed to walk free, they will strike again — more false flag attacks, more war crimes, more needless misery for mankind.

As for Israel as an apartheid nation, living on stolen land and stealing more land gleefully by the day, it cannot go on like this. The world won’t let it. Sooner or later, the collective patience of the world will snap. Israel’s doom as a colonialist enterprise would then be sealed. Nor should anyone shed a tear for Israel when its funeral is announced.

The Mad Dog’s days are numbered…

TEL  AVIV . . . some time in the future


Dr Lasha Darkmoon (email her) is an academic with higher degrees in Classics. She is also a poet and translator. Her articles can be read here, her poetry here.

Insatiable, by Charles Baudelaire (Darkmoon translation)



Strange goddess! dusky as night’s dark shadows
reeking of musk and havana cigars,

spawn of voodoo or African witchcraft,
ebony-flanked diva of darkest night!—
I prefer to opium or rich red wines
the drug of your mouth, where loves lies flaunting
itself.  In the sands of sex I find an
oasis. Your eyes. There I slake my thirst.

Your eyes! the smokeholes of your soul!  Don’t aim
those flamethrowers at me, you pitiless fiend!
I can’t encircle you like a river from hell
nine times . . . nor can I, lustful fury, break
you! Or bend you to my will by playing
a virgin . . .   in the hellpit of your bed.

Charles Baudelaire, Sed Non Satiata

DARKMOON UPON AMERICA, BY ISRAEL SHAMIR: A Debate between Israel Shamir and Lasha Darkmoon

“The world that awaits us, if our New Masters prevail, will be a grim dystopia. It will be a spiritual wasteland in which an unprincipled elite rides roughshod over the teeming masses. It will be a cruel world of exploitation, moral darkness, and unspeakable brutality.” — Lasha Darkmoon, America Vanquished

Darkmoon upon America


by Israel Shamir

Response, Pictures and Captions by Lasha Darkmoon

The gifted British poet Lasha Darkmoon recently published a new essay in two parts called America Vanquished, claiming that the US, Germany and Russia were colonised by Jews.

How close to truth is she? Being a Gothic poet, she embellished her essay a lot, but here is the important part. She says:

In short, the Jews took over America and turned it into a Jewish colony. As simple as that. Their American hosts were hoist with their own petard.

But why worry? American Jews are Americans, are they not? If they’re smart enough to take over America, as they have demonstrably done, why shouldn’t they proceed to the next logical step and take over the world—yes, dominate the world through America? No one denies this is America’s aim: full-spectrum dominance. So if the Jews control America, and if America controls the world, doesn’t it follow logically that the Jews control the world? The logic is irrefutable.

Jewish world domination takes on a different perspective when viewed through this historical prism. No “conspiracy theories” here. No hook-nosed Jews grasping the globe in their cruel talons. No Illuminati trying to sodomize your children and drink their blood. Just logic. Just history. Just America striving for full-spectrum dominance — with Jews leading the pack.

You could say the wild-eyed dreams of the Protocols have at last been realized, but not in the way their original masterminds intended.


ANTI-SEMITIC CARTOON OF THE PREDATORY JEW GRASPING THE GLOBE IN HIS TALON-LIKE CLUTCHES (French caricature, 1898). “No hook-nosed Jews grasping the globe in their cruel talons. No Illuminati trying to sodomize your children and drink their blood. Just logic. Just history. Just America striving for full-spectrum dominance with Jews leading the pack.” — Lasha Darkmoon.

Lasha Darkmoon claims, that if the Jews form an elite in the US, then US world dominance is a form of Jewish world dominance.

Her second claim is that the US has became a colony of Israel. She even claims that  “America is now Israel’s slave”.

There is a huge logical leap here: even if US Jews form an important part of the US elites, why would they give away their leadership to their cousins and brethren in the Middle East?

DARKMOON:  (stepping in) Good point, Mr Shamir. Now consider my logic and try to refute this: If the Israeli Jews give the orders to the American Jews, and if the American Jews control America, then clearly America has become an Israeli colony. But if, on the contrary, American Jews exercise all the power and tell the Israeli Jews what to do, then clearly Israel is an American colony. The logic is inescapable.

Let’s go to the next step.

Once it is admitted that America is controlled by its Jews, whether Israeli Jews or American Jews, America becomes in effect a JEWISH colony.

Given that American Jews were former immigrants to America who have managed to “take over” America, you could say that Jewry has colonized America. Ergo: no matter which way you slice it, America is either an Israeli colony or a Jewish colony. The logic of my argument, I put it to you, is irrefutable.

We can take this therefore as proven: if America is not an Israeli colony, taking its orders from Israeli Jews, then it is a Jewish colony, taking its orders from American Jews.

SHAMIR: World Jewry is a project rather than reality; in real life, Jews of different countries do not feel themselves a single united body though they do interact. Compare them with Catholics: these have the Pope and a single hierarchy, and still they are united in prayer only. Jews have no Pope, no hierarchy, and are even less united.

DARKMOON: Jews less united than the goyim? Wow! I never thought any group could be less united than the goyim, or more united than the Jews in knowing “what is good for the Jews”. If you are trying to convince us that the Jews are DISUNITED just because no two Jews think alike, some preferring Buddhism to Judaism and others preferring kippas to hats, then you are on very shaky ground indeed! We are well aware that no two individuals, whether Jewish or non-Jewish, think alike; just as we are aware that no two individuals have identical fingerprints. It doesn’t follow from this, however, that people with different opinions are going to be disunited, any more than it follows that people with different fingerprints are going to be disunited.

To say that Jews lack unity is almost like saying America lacks military power. Or the Queen of England is short of cash. The Jews  have far more unity, I put it to you, than any other other ethnic group in the world. This fundamental cohesion of the Jews is something I have pointed out in my recent essay America Vanquished:

“The extraordinary success of the Jews, who make up only 2.5 percent of America’s population, can be attributed to meticulous organization, coordination and networking. This advantageous cohesiveness derives from an evolutionary characteristic of the Jews: an exceptionally strong ethnocentricism which has enabled them to infiltrate almost every single organization that could possibly threaten them as a group.” (See here)

Despite the superficial differences between various types of Jews, the Jews are surely a paradigm of unity and cohesion compared to other ethnic groups.

You yourself, Mr Shamir, have written: “Palestine is not the Ultimate goal of the Jews; the world is.” Consider that statement. Can you seriously tell  me that the Jews are likely to achieve this grandiose goal of world domination by being disunited and disorganized? by lacking coordination? No, of course not!

One could supply countless arguments to demonstrate the remarkable unity of the Jews in achieving “what is good for the Jews”. Pray tell: how did the Jews manage to take over the mass media, Hollywood, academia, the judiciary, the executive branches of government, Wall Street, the world’s banking system, the lavishly funded Think Tanks, even the porn industry, if they were disorganized and disunited?

The major Jewish organizations that crisscross America like a spider’s web—AIPAC being only one of them—can hardly be accused of ineffective disunity.

You’ve heard of mesira, the code of honor among Jews that make them stick together through thick and thin, never betraying an organ-stealing rabbi or even a serial killer to the goy authorities. Isn’t sticking together the ultimate form of unity?

You’ve  heard of the Sayanim, Mossad’s one million worldwide helpers. How these faceless individuals, all Jews living in lands outside Israel, work away for Israel in providing “safe houses”, transportation, access to communications networks and other facilities for Mossad spies. Full details of the existence of the Mossad Sayanim network were given in the 1994 book The Other Side of Deception by Victor Ostrovsky, himself a renegade Mossad agent.

The Jewish Sayanim remind me of bees, all buzzing away for the common good,  all united by a common purpose: to cram the hive full of honey.

One final point, Mr Shamir, which I know will make you graciously concede victory to me on this vitally important issue: in saying that “the Jews have no Pope, no hierarchy, and are even less united” than the goyim, you are guilty of a glaring contradiction. Wasn’t it only a few years ago that you argued the very opposite? Far from implying that the Jews were a disunited group, you stated that they possessed an almost supernatural unity, comparing them to locusts that moved in ordered formation to achieve their common goal.

“It is hard to swallow that the Jews have a strategy,” you said, “but no strategist. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are popular precisely because they posit such a supreme strategist.” And then, to drive home the point, you added the famous quotation from the Bible: ‘The locusts have no king, yet they attack in formation’ and devastate whole countries as if by plan.” (Cabbala of Power, p.13)

That last phrase—“and devastate whole countries as if by plan”—is your own. You are daringly comparing the Jews to locusts who have an uncanny and almost supernatural ability to act in unison.

CAN JEWS BE COMPARED TO LOCUSTS, ACTING IN COORDINATION? “The locusts have no king, yet they attack in formation” (Proverbs 30:27) and devastate whole countries as if by plan.

SHAMIR: Israel is a very important element of Jewish life, Lasha, but this does not mean an Israeli Prime Minister can order Jews around.

Granted, politically active Americans think that one can’t succeed without Jewish support. This much we can learn from the incredible reception of Netanyahu in the Capitol and from Obama’s capitulation. And US politicians think that the US Jews love Israel; that is why they express their love of Israel. However, the American Jews’ feelings towards Israel are not that straightforward. Remember a prominent American Jewish politician Henry Kissinger? He facilitated the greatest Arab attack on Israel in 1973 in order to take Israel down a notch.

So, US Jews are certainly an important part of the US elites. Consequently they influence world politics, while the Israeli Jews are just family and friends of these powerful American Jews. This is the secret of Israeli influence: without the support of American  Jews, Israel would shrink to its normal size.

“Without the support of American Jews, Israel would shrink to its normal size.” — Israel Shamir

The US Jews’ position in the US is so strong because US society has been formed and influenced by the Jewish spirit of predatory capitalism, as expounded by such diverse thinkers as Karl Marx, Werner Sombart and Milton Friedman. Defeat of financial predatory capitalism could undo the Jewish hold. It would de-Jewify the Jews and society in general.

And here we come to your second claim, Lasha: namely, that Russia and Germany are colonised by Jews. Even granting your poetic licence, this is far from the truth. Germany is not colonised by Jews; it is still occupied by the US troops.

DARKMOON:  I’m not disagreeing with you, Mr Shamir, about Germany being under US occupation. In fact, I quote Eustace Mullins in Part 1 of my essay saying exactly the same thing.  But I certainly never said that Germany had been “colonized by Jews”. Where did I say that? I would never have made such a ridiculous statement. I said that about America, but not about Germany.

SHAMIR:  Jews play a negligible part in modern German life, Lasha. Even after the the defeat of the Third Reich, there was no resurgence of the Jewish spirit. Germany has a strong social security structure.  Predatory financial capitalism has  made few inroads. Germany is not a neoliberal state. The Germans pay tribute to Israel, that’s true; but this is only a result of American occupation. The West Germans are indeed indoctrinated in guilt feelings towards Jews, but East Germans have no guilt feelings whatsoever, and they influence the totality of German feelings. If and when US troops leave Germany, Germany will reassert itself.

Again, Russia is not colonized by Jews. Some Jewish oligarchs were expelled, and others were imprisoned by Putin. Russia usually votes against Israel in the UN and supplied enemies of Israel with its advanced weaponry. Russia now has fewer Jews than Scotland: about two hundred thousand altogether by official census, and twice that much by overblown Jewish organisations’ estimate. Granted, Russia has no anti-Semitism, and it has some influential Jews, but the important decisions are not made by them.

Was Russia “colonized by Jews” after the October 1917 revolution? This is the weakest part of your essay, Lasha. I’m afraid you know little about this subject and just repeat the silly claims of others.

DARKMOON: Again, Mr Shamir,  I must point out with all due respect that at no time did I ever claim that Russia was “colonized by Jews”, nor did I even imply it. The same with Germany. However, if that is the impression I gave you, then I must apologize for not making my meaning clearer.

SHAMIR: You tell us that important Bolsheviks used pseudonyms; true, but this is not always connected with their Jewishness. Lenin’s real name was Ulyanov, but this is not a Jewish name. The early Bolsheviks were guerrilla fighters, and they used all sorts of names to evade surveillance. This is also a part of underground ethos.

DARKMOON: Again, I am in full agreement with you, Mr Shamir. So there’s no point ticking me off  for disagreeing with you!

What I said in my article was that almost every single revolutionary Jew in Bolshevik Russia hid behind a non-Jewish name. This was either because they were engaged in subversive activities or because they were anxious to avoid being the victims of the virulent anti-semitism of those times.

Pseudonyms were adopted by non-Jews just as frequently if they were involved in seditious activities. Stalin, whose real name was Joseph Djugashvili, had at least 40 pseudonyms. See Simon Sebag Montefiore’s Young Stalin, p.395, for a list of his false names. Lenin, who was half Jewish, not only had over a hundred bogus names, but also went in for glued-on wigs and giant spectacles!

SHAMIR:  Abu Jihad, Abu Ammar and Abu Mazen are nicknames, but surely they are not Jews. You and your readers, Lasha, should read Lindemann’s book Esau’s Tears. This deals extensively with the question of the Bolshevik leaders Jewishness.

These crazy numbers you quote— “66 million Russian Christians killed by Jews”— “out of 388 members of the new revolutionary government in Russia, only sixteen were real Russians”—were invented by anticommunists.

DARKMOON: Good point, Mr Shamir. I concede that the 66 million figure is probably a gross exaggeration, just as the SIX MILLION FIGURE is often alleged to be. (Note, I myself make no comment on this figure, since mathematics is not my forte.) However, both figures have been advanced by their respective propagandists. I decided to quote the 66 million figure for two reasons: (a) because I believe it was mentioned by the great Solzhenitsyn who was not given to lying; and (b) because the 66 million figure is actually mentioned in the title of Eustace Mullins’ classic essay, “The Secret Holocaust”, which I quoted extensively in my article. (See here). Since I was quoting from Mullins, I decided to quote his figures also, giving my readers his viewpoint.

The most conservative figure for the Russian Holocaust, now agreed upon by specialist historians and even cited in the Times newspaper (UK) is 50 million dead Russians.  This figure was achieved within a 36-year period of mass murder (1917-1953), initiated by Lenin the quarter-Jew and continued by Stalin, a Georgian non-Jew, who surrounded himself on all sides by Jewish commissars and sexy young Jewesses he liked to bed.

If you think fifty million deaths is an inflated figure, I assure you it is not.

One Jew alone, the infamous Lazar Kaganovich, personally claimed responsibility for killing twenty million. It was he who stood atop the rubble of a Christian church and proclaimed, “Mother Russia has been cast down! We have torn away her skirts!”

Apart from Kaganovich, there were other Jews who contributed to the massacre of Christians under the cruelest circumstances: Ilya Ehrenburg, Natalfy Frenkel, Mathias Berman, Genrikh Yagoda (lingerie pervert), and, last but not least, Lavrenti Beria—though Beria may or may not have been Jewish. Mainstream historians assert that he was not. But they would, wouldn’t they? — given that Beria was not only a mass murderer of peasants, but also a bloodthirsty sex maniac and pedophile who buried children in his basement — probably alive. (See here and here, pp. 516-519 ).

At no other time in the history of the world has a country been so saturated with Jewish influence as it was between 1917 and 1953 in the Soviet Union: the time of the great gulags and the merciless slaughter of the peasants.

America now faces a similar saturation problem. There have been no Soviet-style massacres in America — not yet, thank God. But who knows what grisly surprises history has up its sleeve?

If the Jews can kill 50 million people in Russia and get away with it, they can kill 50 million people in America too, but maybe they won’t get away with it so easily next time. If they can do it once, they can do it twice — unless the leopard changes its spots.

SHAMIR: We know that imperialist propaganda is able to utilize anti-Jewish prejudice in its own interests: thus, when the Empire bombed Libya, its propagandists improbably claimed that Qaddafi is a Jew and a sympathiser of Israel. When the Empire hunted Julian Assange, its fifth column claimed that he is a Mossad agent. For this reason one should be cautious at accepting such claims: they can be done by enemies with subversive purpose.

Jews played an important part in Soviet Russia’s life, and they paid for that by their obedience and strict observance of Russia’s interests. If they strayed, they were severely punished by Stalin; if they played ball, they were allowed to stay in positions of power.

The lesson of Soviet Russia and Jews was directly opposite to that read by Lasha: even if Jews play an important role in the country, a determined ruler can correct and limit their influence.

This can be done by undoing financial capitalism. Not in vain, some Jewish pundits describe Occupy Wall Street as an “anti-Semitic movement”. Though the participants surely harbor no evil thoughts about the Jews, their goal of destroying the neoliberal model is at variance with Jewish power structures. Without their money, the Jews will shrink into mere shadows of themselves, and the nightmare will be over.

THE ROTHSCHILDS AT PRAYER: “Without their money, the Jews will shrink into mere shadows of themselves, and the nightmare will be over.” — Israel Shamir

“More than one family friend has mentioned that, for every meal, the Rothschild family sets a place at the table for Lucifer.”

— Fritz Springermeier, quote and picture found here.

DARKMOON: (summing up): I am not really in disagreement with you on most important points. Even though I have accused you of being guilty of a “glaring contradiction” — your apparent U-turn on the unity of the Jews, once united like a swarm of locusts flying in ordered ranks, now disunited and split into several conflicting groups — this need not in fact be a contradiction at all.  It could be a development or new nuance to your views, an added complexity; indeed, a kind of paradox in which the Jews are united and disunited at the same time, just as the universe is filled with light and darkness at the same time, and just as good and evil exist simultaneously in the same heart.

On one point, however, I am forced to take issue with you:  I never said that Germany and Russia were “Jewish colonies”.

America, yes; but not Germany and Russia. And America only in a metaphorical sense. To all intents and purposes, America has become a Jewish colony.

Jews did not emigrate to Germany and Russia en masse as they emigrated to the United States. They were already well entrenched in Germany and Russia, part of the unassimilated population of those two nations for several centuries. They sprung to prominence in Germany, reaching their maximum degree of influence in the time of the Weimar Republic (1919-1933), just before the ascent of Hitler to power.

In Russia,  the Jews  sprung to similar prominence at the time of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, led on by the Jew Lenin and his Shabbat goy henchman, Stalin, who was later to become the world’s greatest mass murderer—aided and abetted by his closely knit contingent of court Jews.

See Simon Sebag Montefiore’s sensational 2-part biography Young Stalin and Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar.

Never before have I read a biography with so many Jews in the forefront, all seething like maggots in the rich soil of Mother Russia, all thirsting like vampires for the blood of their Christian victims.

Full marks to Simon Sebag Montefiore, himself a Jew, for having the courage to draw our attention to these frightening freaks of nature.

They belong in the seventh circle of Dante’s hell.

“ANOTHER PEOPLE WILL POSSESS YOUR LAND…” — Lasha Darkmoon, ‘The Coming Doom’.

Life is too short and precious to waste it on “anti-Semitism”. One has to move beyond this puerile response to Jewish world supremacy. Perhaps the role of the Jew in human affairs is to be the beast of prey that teaches the rest of us to run a bit faster.


Dr Lasha Darkmoon (email her) is an academic with higher degrees in Classics. She is also a poet and translator. Her articles can be sampled here, her poems here.

AMERICA VANQUISHED, Part 2: America under Jewish Rule

“When the world looks at America, what it sees is an Israeli colony.”
— Paul Craig Roberts

America has been taken over.

Slowly and imperceptibly, duped by lies and lulled into complacency, Americans have let their country slip into the hands of a fifth column: of  a hostile ethnic elite whose primary allegiance is to Israel, a country built on stolen land and engaged in systematic genocide.

This is the rogue state that is arguably responsible for the greatest mass murder in history: the catastrophe of 9-11. If scientific evidence and forensic logic are anything to go on, Israel has to be suspect number one here, given its unbroken record of terrorism and its endless breaches of international law. Any country that can orchestrate such a spectacular crime and get away with it—while somehow managing to pin the blame on nineteen Arabs with box cutters—is clearly a force to be reckoned with.

More than 200 senior military, intelligence, and law enforcement officials, including two generals, have now questioned the 9-11 Commission’s report. They have been joined by over 1500 top architects and engineers, 250 pilots and aviation experts, 400 university professors, and 250 survivors and their families. David Ray Griffin, author of eleven books on 9-11 and a distinguished professor emeritus, has concluded definitively: “All the proffered evidence that America was attacked by Muslims on 9-11 appears to have been fabricated.”

Dr Alan Sabrosky, former director of the Army War College, has upped the ante and unequivocally identified Israel as the guilty party.  “What we need to stand up and say is not only did they [the Israelis] attack the USS Liberty, but that it is 100 percent certain 9/11 was a Mossad operation.”

If any further proof were needed of America’s abject enslavement to Zionist interests, however, it would be Obama’s humiliation at the hands of Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu earlier this year. This humiliation has occurred on three separate occasions: in September 2009, in July 2010, and again only last May. Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank writes almost gloatingly of Obama flying “the white flag of surrender” in the White House—where he sat “routed and humiliated.”

Obama’s offense?

He had asked the Israelis to observe international law by stopping settlement construction on Palestinian land. He had pleaded with them to withdraw to the 1967 borders, in accordance with UN Resolution 242—a reasonable enough request which every American President before him has asked the Israelis to consider in the interests of peace.

The Israeli Prime Minister’s response? — “Israel will NOT return to the indefensible boundaries of 1967!”

So how is it that this rude and recalcitrant “ally” of America still continues to receive its $3 billion a year subsidy? Is America so besotted with love for the Jewish state that it cannot say ‘No’? Silly question. Since it rests on the Chomskyite assumption that America is still the lord and master and little Israel the dependent colony.

The riddle is easily solved if one turns Chomsky’s assumption on its head: organized Jewry, having taken over America, has transformed it into an Israeli colony. The $8.2 million per day that the American taxpayer pays his Jewish master is not a subsidy. It is tribute money. It is a tax or levy imposed on a vanquished people by their conquerors.

Hear the note of contempt for one’s own President in this extraordinary account of  Obama’s humiliation at the hands of Netanyahu, his Jewish victor:

Netanyahu beat Obama like a red-headed stepchild; he played him like a fiddle; he pounded him like a big brass drum. The Prime Minister of Israel danced rings around his arrogant, professorial opponent. The Prime Minister mopped the floor with our guy….Bibi ripped him to shreds…demonstrating to the whole world that the Prime Minister of Israel has substantially more support in both the House and the Senate than the President of the United States. 

I guess that says it all. Poor Obama. He has been symbolically castrated and buried in excrement up to the neck. Those 29 standing ovations Netanyahu received in Congress were equivalent to a lump of spit in the President’s face.

According to political pundit Philip Giraldi, this was “the first time in recorded history that a small nation with less than eight million citizens has subjugated a much larger country with a population of more than 310 million.”

The Zionization of America is complete, with AIPAC appointing the government and 60 million Christian Zionists ready to die for their new masters in Jerusalem.

America is now Israel’s slave.


“I’ve never seen a President stand up to them. They always get what they want. If the American people understood what a grip those people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms.” (Admiral Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, 1983)

At this point I feel the need to apologize for the picture of the finger-wagging rabbi at the end of Part 1 of this essay, together with the inflammatory words he is purported to have uttered about the Jewish desire for world domination. I can hear my critics cry: “Silly airhead, why do you spout all this Protocolian poppycock? Don’t you know the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is an anti-Semitic forgery?”

Yes, I confess with a sigh that I have heard the word “forgery” often advanced as a reason not to read this brilliant political treatise, second only to Plato’s Republic in its profundity.

What I am saying, however, has nothing to do with the Protocols. I am not a conspiracy theorist. I am a historian who is interested only in facts. Truth alone stirs my heart.

Let’s take another quick look at Zionism.

In a recent essay called Why Palestine is Important, Israel Shamir presents a picture that puts this entire Protocolian nonsense into perspective:

Palestine is important because it is believed to be a linchpin of Empire, one of the key points necessary to control the world. Such was the conviction of the 19th century British Empire-builders of the Rhodes variety….Once an arcane theory developed by HJ Mackinder, it has grown up to become a driving force behind globalism …. Mackinder planned the subjugation of the whole planet to the Empire …. Napoleon [had earlier] toyed with the idea of planting Jews in Palestine as France’s foot soldiers, but there were no takers among Jews. The Brits achieved what the French could not.

Zionism, in other words, according to Shamir’s recent take on the subject, was a British inspiration and a tool in the armory of Pax Britannica. It was the way the Brits intended to conquer the world. They would plonk the unwanted Jews in Palestine as their proxies. Israel, in effect, was to be a British colony. And Lord Balfour, when he drew up the famous Balfour Declaration in 1917, had a glint in his beady little eye. He was more interested in advancing the designs of the British Empire than in being nice to the Jews.

If all this is true—and I think it possibly is—we can see what happened next. By 1948 the British Empire had collapsed in ruins. It was no longer in a position to use Israel as its cat’s paw. Another emerging nation however, the chief beneficiary of World War II, certainly was. This was America. Yet even as far back as 1948, America was largely controlled by its Jews. Their influence, though it was to grow by leaps and bounds  after 1967, was enormous even in 1948.

It was the Jews who twisted President Truman’s arm and got him to give his full backing to their fledgling state. It was the Jews again, through the vengeful  Morgenthau, as I indicated in Part 1 of this essay, who were to make life a living hell for the conquered Germans in the aftermath of World War II. The Jews were always in the background, it seems, the shadowy lurkers in the cabbage patch of history.

The colony that the Brits had failed to acquire in the Middle East, Israel, was inherited by America. So Chomsky was right after all. To start with, anyway. Israel was to be America’s aircraft carrier in the Middle East. The Americans would use it as a gigantic military base from which to plunder Arab oil. Nor would they have any problems with Ben Gurion’s dreams of a Greater Israel stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates. After all, why not give the Jews what they wanted?

Greater Israel was simply to be an extension of America: its fifty-first state.

Things didn’t work out as planned. The best-laid schemes of mice and men, we are told, often go askew. The tables were turned on the simple-minded Americans. The Jews were much smarter than their WASP masters could ever be. They had acquired through three thousand years of bitter experience the arts of duplicity and cunning. Guile was their genetic patrimony. They were the Ultimate Survivors.

One has to hand it to the Jews. The hitherto oppressed decided to become the oppressors. The former victims decided to take on the role of predators. The cat’s paw decided it would rather be the Cat from now on—and it became the Cat’s Pajamas.

In short, the Jews took over America and turned it into a Jewish colony. As simple as that. Their American hosts were hoist with their own petard.

But why worry? American Jews are Americans, are they not? If they’re smart enough to take over America, as they have demonstrably done, why shouldn’t they proceed to the next logical step and take over the world—yes, dominate the world  through America? No one denies this is America’s aim: full spectrum dominance. So if the Jews control America, and if America controls the world, doesn’t it follow logically that the Jews control the world? The logic is irrefutable.

Jewish world domination takes on a different perspective when viewed through this historical prism. No “conspiracy theories” here. No hook-nosed Jews grasping the globe in their cruel talons. No Illuminati trying to sodomize your children and drink their blood. Just logic. Just history. Just America striving for full-spectrum dominance with Jews leading the pack.

You could say the wild-eyed dreams of the Protocols have at last been realized, but not in the way their original masterminds intended.

The shape of things to come…?

Allow me now to present the testimony of Eustace Mullins, if only for the vivid pictures he presents to the mind of the terrors endured by millions of Russian Christians in Bolshevik Russia when it was under Jewish hegemony. Could this be the fate of American Christians in the not too distant future?

There are too many well documented massacres in history in which the Jews tortured and murdered their victims with the greatest glee, gloating in such barbaric practices as tearing out the hearts of women and children and smearing the blood on their faces.

The orgy of murder, torture and pillage which followed the Jewish triumph in Russia [after the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917] has never been equaled in the history of the world. The Jews were free to indulge their most fervent fantasies of mass murder of helpless victims.

Christians were dragged from their beds, tortured and killed. Some were actually sliced to pieces, bit by bit, while others were branded with hot irons, their eyes poked out to induce unbearable pain.

Others were placed in boxes…then hungry rats placed in the boxes to gnaw upon their bodies. Some were nailed to the ceiling by their fingers or by their feet, and left hanging until they died of exhaustion.

Others were chained to the floor and hot lead poured into their mouths. Many were tied to horses and dragged through the streets of the city, while the mob attacked them with rocks and kicked them to death.

Mothers were taken to the public square and their babies snatched from their arms….the baby [was] tossed into the air while another member of the mob rushed to catch it on the tip of his bayonet.

Pregnant Christian women were chained to trees and their babies cut out of their bodies.  (See here)

“We should never forget what happened when Jews were a hostile elite in the USSR,” Prof. Kevin MacDonald notes bleakly. “The loathing and contempt for the traditional people and culture of Russia was a major factor in the avid Jewish participation in the greatest crimes of the 20th century.”

MacDonald is referring to the systematic murder of over 50 million Russians under Lenin and Stalin: a period of mass murder spanning 36 years (1917-1953).

The new American elite—as I pointed out in Part 1 of this article, “America as an Israeli Colony”—is a Jewish elite. Exactly like the elite in Bolshevik Russia and Stalin’s USSR. And it is essentially a hostile elite that “loathes the nation it rules.”

So we need to watch out.

Because what happened to millions of Russians in the first half of the 20th century—systematic genocide—could well happen to millions of Americans in the foreseeable future.

“It is quite possible,” Kevin MacDonald muses, “that we are entering into a racial dystopia of unimaginable cruelty.”

A game called Survival

The extraordinary success of the Jews, who make up only 2.5 percent of America’s population, can be attributed to meticulous organization, coordination and networking. This advantageous cohesiveness derives from an evolutionary characteristic of the Jews: an exceptionally strong ethnocentricism which has enabled them to infiltrate almost every single organization that could possibly threaten them as a group. In America, highly gifted Jews whose primary loyalty is to Israel have managed to insinuate their way into key policy positions, including the Departments of Treasury and State, the Pentagon, the National Security Council and the White House.

Over the past 24 months not a single policy maker [James Petras tells us] has voiced any criticism of Israel’s most heinous crimes, ranging from the savaging of Gaza to the massacre of the humanitarian flotilla and the expansion of new settlements in Jerusalem and the West Bank….Many of the leading Zionist policy makers rose to power through a deliberate strategy of infiltrating the government to shape policy promoting Israel’s interest over and above the interests of the US populace.

If the goyim have lost the game of life and their hard-won freedoms to the Jews, it was because they didn’t know they were playing a game in the first place. A game for the highest possible stakes.

A game called Survival.


The world that awaits us, if our New Masters prevail, will be a grim dystopia.    It will be a spiritual wasteland in which an unprincipled elite rides roughshod over the teeming masses. It will be a cruel world of exploitation, moral darkness, and unspeakable brutality.

“Death solves all problems,” Stalin quipped cynically. “No man, no problem.” When mass extermination becomes the miracle cure, exciting times can be expected.

In Otto Friedrich’s widely acclaimed Holocaust study, The Kingdom of Auschwitz, a concentration camp survivor is quoted as saying:

Concentration camp existence taught us that the whole world is really like a concentration camp. The world is ruled by neither justice nor morality. Crime is not punished nor virtue rewarded. The world is ruled by power. We are laying the foundation for some new, monstrous civilization.

An innocent victim of this “new, monstrous civilization”,
a Palestinian child, his arm cut off by an Israeli settler for throwing a stone. (See here)

 So this is where we are now: in the eye of the storm.

America, once a democracy, is now a crypto-fascist country ruled by a corporate and cosmopolitan elite. “There is no freedom, no democracy, and no government accountability in Amerika, a fascist state,” Paul Craig Roberts concludes ruefully in one of his recent essays.

The Jews, fulfilling the wildest dreams conjured up in the Protocols, stand surveying the killing fields of the world they have conquered. Iraq and Afghanistan lie in ruins, thanks to their machinations. Iran lies in the cross-hairs, awaiting its expected doom. And meanwhile in America, as the body bags are flown in from foreign parts and the lurid circus of bread and games grinds on relentlessly, there is nothing much to live for except sex and death.

Stalin’s willing executioners, the Jews, are now the ruling elite in America. As in Weimar Germany, the Jews make most of the money and help to create a culture of neo-paganism and nihilism, decadence and despair. Nothing has changed except the country.

Russia, Germany, America — they all went down like skittles in a row.

“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever.”  — George Orwell, 1984