Edited and presented with pictures, captions and additional comments by Lasha Darkmoon
NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSIT No one provokes me with impunity
Shortly after Vladimir Putin was elected president of Russia in 2000, the murdered family of Tzar Nicholas was beatified. Until quite recently, the centers of Jewish power had hoped to preserve some idealized memories of the murderous Soviet system in the minds of the Russians, but it turned out to be a vain hope.
Because Bolshevism was formulated and executed by Jews, their power centers had retained fond hopes of being able some day to reconnect and reinstall some sort of Jewish lobby leverage in the Kremlin. These fond hopes were dashed by Vladimir Putin. Read More
An Israeli geneticist challenges the “Zionist” hypothesis that all Jews belong to one race and are intimately related, thus giving them a common ancestor in the Holy Land and a Biblical claim to Palestine.
Scientists usually don’t call each other “liars” and “frauds.”
But that’s how Johns Hopkins University post-doctoral researcher Eran Elhaik describes a group of widely respected geneticists, including Harry Ostrer, professor of pathology and genetics at Yeshiva University’sAlbert Einstein College of Medicineand author of the 2012 book “Legacy: A Genetic History of the Jewish People.” Read More
Source Presented with pictures and captions by Lasha Darkmoon
“In this devastating critique of 9/11, Dr Kevin Barrett unravels the shocking truth: that this was a terrorist attack on innocent Americans by their own government — a government that has now morphed into an axis of evil with Israel and the NATO countries.” — Lasha Darkmoon
WHERE HAVE ALL THE TOWERS GONE? AND WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE 1,116 MISSING 9/11 VICTIMS?
More than 11 years after the catastrophic destruction of the World Trade Center, New York City’s government is finally asking: What in the world could have happened to the missing 1,116 victims?
In every building collapse in history, all of the victims’ bodies have been recovered more or less intact. That is because falling buildings crush human bodies. They do not shred them into tiny pieces, or cause them to vanish into thin air.
Yet on September 11th, 2001, the most famous “building collapses” in history somehow caused the bodies of more than 1,000 victims to magically disappear. Not even a shred of skin, a fragment of fingernail, or a shard of bone from any of these bodies was ever recovered, despite meticulous “sifting and bucketing” efforts.
But that’s not the only mystery. Hardly anything was left of the 1,634 WTC occupants who did not completely vanish. Most of the human remains discovered and DNA-identified were in the form of tiny, shredded pieces, not intact bodies.
What happened to the nearly 3,000 human bodies that were annihilated during the ten-second disappearances of the 110-story Towers? Answer: The same thing that happened to the office furniture, filing cabinets, telephones, computers, and other contents of the Towers. Virtually no remains of these objects were ever recovered, either. They – like the human bodies – were somehow transformed into a mixture of tiny shards and sub-100-micron dust, which floated out to sea and slowly settled into the Atlantic. As one of the sifters-and-bucketers remarked, the biggest piece of office furniture recovered from Ground Zero was a tiny fragment of a telephone keypad.
“What happened to the 3000 human bodies that were annihilated during the 10-second disappearances of the Twin Towers?”
Now, more than 11 years later, the New York City government is finally acknowledging the mystery. In a memo to the 9/11 victims’ families, NYC official Casey Holloway announced that this Monday, April 1st, the city’s Chief Medical Examiner will begin sifting through 60 truckloads of World Trade Center construction debris at Fresh Kills Landfill on Staten Island. The city says it hopes to find remains of at least some of the 1,116 missing victims.
Unfortunately, the chances of finding remains of more than a few additional victims seem remote. After all, the Twin Towers debris – which amounted to less than 50% of the mass of the Towers (what happened to the rest of the mass?) – was already meticulously sifted and bucketed more than a decade ago. The city’s decision to sift through recent construction debris beginning April 1st bears more than a passing resemblance to George W. Bush’s decision to get down on his hands and knees to look under his desk for the missing Iraqi WMD. Is this some kind of cruel April Fools’ Day joke?
The absence of crushed-but-intact human bodies, office furniture and equipment, and 50% of the Towers’ mass suggests that the Twin Towers did not collapse – they exploded. (See the Youtube film “North Tower Exploding.”) This would explain why tiny human bone fragments were discovered scattered all over the roof of the neighboring Deutsche Bank building in 2006. No simple gravitational collapse, like the one posited by US government’s official NIST Report, could possibly blast human skeletons to smithereens and deposit those smithereens all over the roof of a neighboring building.
Were the Twin Towers, and the thousands of people inside them, blown to bits by explosives? That is what many of the 9/11 victims’ family members believe. Robert McIlvaine, whose son Bobby was murdered in the Twin Towers on 9/11, has stated that roughly half the family members share his suspicion that the Towers were explosively demolished in a false-flag attack. William Rodriguez, the famous 9/11 hero who has spoken to hundreds of thousands of people around the world, is another representative of the 9/11 survivors who asserts that the evidence for “controlled demolition” is an open secret.
Scientist Carl Sagan once pointed out that “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” But sometimes absence of evidence IS a smoking gun. The absence of intact bodies, office contents, and half of the mass of the Twin Towers is a smoking gun proving that the Towers were explosively demolished.
THE THREE MUSKETEERS OF 9/11ENJOYING A PRIVATE JOKE
The missing contents and mass of the Twin Towers are not the only mysterious “absence” connected with 9/11. Other notable “missing evidence” includes:
* The absence of the US government’s 80-plus videos of the attack on the Pentagon, some of which were confiscated by FBI agents just moments after the attack. Only a few frames have been released, and those frames show an explosion at the Pentagon but no big airliner.
* The absence of the 100,000 kilos of Boeing 757 airliner that supposedly entered the Pentagon. No record exists of those 100,000 kilos of airliner debris, or the plane’s luggage and passenger remains, ever being removed from any of the three widely-separated damaged areas of the Pentagon.
* The absence of the 100,000 kilos of Boeing 757 airliner that supposedly buried itself in the soft earth beneath a shallow fifteen-foot-diameter crater in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. There is no evidence of 100,000 kilos of airliner debris, along with passenger remains and luggage, being recovered from beneath the ground at the alleged crash site.
* The absence of the official airline passenger lists, security video footage, ticket stubs, testimony from airline employees, or any other actual evidence that the 19 young Arabs blamed for 9/11 were even on the planes.
* The absence of the audio recordings of FAA personnel debriefing each other about what they experienced on 9/11. These recordings were confiscated by an FAA supervisor and shredded into tiny pieces, which were discarded into many widely-separated trash receptacles so they could never be collected and reconstructed.
* The absence of the indestructible “black boxes” of the planes that hit the Twin Towers. The US government claims these flight data recorders were never recovered, but first responders say they were present when they were found and taken away by FBI agents.
* The absence of the government’s most important cited evidence: The audio and video recordings of the lengthy torture sessions and scripted false confessions of mentally-retarded “9/11 mastermind” Abu Zubaydah and his fellow “mastermind” Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. The CIA admits that it illegally destroyed these recordings, anonymous second-hand reports of which are cited in the 9/11 Commission Report as its only evidence for the 19-hijackers scenario.
* The absence of any plausible innocent explanation for the BBC’s premature report of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, Larry Silverstein’s confession that he demolished WTC-7, and (of course) the obvious controlled demolition of that building.
In every one of these cases — as in the case of the 1,116 missing victims — the absence of evidence is a smoking gun.
The US government now faces a complete absence of legitimacy.
SEARCHING FOR CLUES AMID THE RUBBLE OF 9/11
LD: Nothing that could have embarrassed the US government survived the explosions. Even the “indestructible” black boxes containing key flight information had been complete vaporized, contrary to the laws of physics. Even more miraculously and conveniently for the US government, two charred passports of alleged Al Qaeda terrorists, one of them ringleader Mohammed Atta, had been found intact in the ruins — almost as if someone had placed them there on purpose to be found. (See here)
The passport of Mohamma Atta… found intact in the rubble of Ground Zero
Among the many missing items, $2.3 trillion, for which Rabbi Dov Zakheim had been personally accountable at the Pentagon, mysteriously disappeared into thin air. People are asking: what happened to this enormous sum of money? Did it end up in Israel? Was it perhaps Israel’s “payment” for services rendered on 9/11?
Altogether, 9/11 has proved to be a very successful heist: with over 1 million Iraqis dead and the warmongers of the military-industrial complex incomparably richer — and now eager for new conquests and money-making opportunities in Iran.
A condensed and edited version of an interview with Greek Holocaust denier Konstantinos Plevris, the first Holocaust denier in history to be tried in a court of law and found ‘Not Guilty’ — much to the anger and alarm of organized Jewry.
Pictures, captions and comments by Lasha Darkmoon.
LD: Greek nationalist lawyer and self-confessed anti-Semite, Konstaninos Plevris, author of The Jews: The Whole Truth, was initially found guilty of inciting racial hatred against Jews in December 2007, this verdict being based entirely on outspoken quotations found in the above-mentioned 1400-page book.
Thus Plevris described Joseph Goebbels as “one of the brightest minds of the century, a philosopher with a deep understanding of mass psychology”. He called ZYKLON B gas “merely a poisonous gas used to fumigate the concentration camps … extensively publicized as the gas used to put Jews to death in special gas chambers which have not been found.” Finally, Plevris’s praise of Adolf Hitler was not appreciated by the Jews who regard Hitler as the most evil man in history—second only in infamy to Jesus Christ, of course, who is now being burned in hot excrement in hell according to the Talmud. “The tragic leader of the German Third Reich is certainly the most impressive leadership figure of the modern age,” Plevris enthuses about Hitler, adding ruefully, “He could have rid Europe of the Jews, but he did not.”
Other complaints against Plevris is that he subscribed to “the myth of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” that he characterized Jewish children in the concentration camps as “very fat and well-fed”, and that he regarded Jews as “mortal enemies” and as “subhuman”. (See here)
Plevris appealed the court ruling, and on the 27th of March 2009 the court of appeals overturned all charges against him. His complete exoneration by the most distinguished legal brains in Greek jurisprudence was to prompt angry charges from Jewish sources that there had been a “miscarriage of justice”.
However, it was not easy to prove that admiration of Adolf Hitler or doubts about the Holocaust could in any way equate with incitement to violence against Jews; nor that failure to love Jews or hold them in high esteem was in itself a crime.
PETER PAPAHERAKLIS [TBR]: I am here at the home of Mr Konstantinos Plevris to interview him and learn about his beliefs. Specifically, about his very big and important book, “The Jews: The Whole Truth”, which is not yet available in English. Mr Plevris has some introductory remarks…
KONSTANINOS PLEVRIS: Three years ago, I published in Athens my book “The Jews: The Whole Truth.” (Picks up book and shows it to camera.) This is 1,400 pages long. This book is full of facts, proofs, references to 270 authors, writers, other books and of course photos. Immediately after the publication of my book, the Central Council of Jews in Greece and the European Jewish Congress started a campaign against me. They went to the prime minister of Greece asking me to be condemned. They went to the Justice Department, and, after three years of legal fights, I have finally won 100 percent in the Supreme Court of Athens. Justice prevailed; the court proved itself to be independent and not under Jewish control.
TBR: What do you think of the Jewish “Holocaust” hypothesis?
PLEVRIS: I don’t believe in the “Holocaust.” Of course many Jews died during WWII, but there is no proof the Germans planned to exterminate them.
TBR: We understand that you do not now believe in the Jewish “Holocaust” of World War II. But did you at any point in your life believe it?
PLEVRIS: No, I never believed in the “Holocaust.” That is the reason that I have examined the figures that they have given. In 1968, more than 40 years ago, I published a book on it with the title The Myth.
According to the evidence that we have, it was impossible to have killed 6 million Jews — because in all the countries that were occupied by Hitler there were only 4,200,000 Jews according to the official statistics. Even if he arrested all of them, he still could not come up with 6 million.
But Hitler never planned to kill the Jews. He only wanted to transport them to the island of Madagascar or some other place.
Anyway, almost 3,300,000 Jews have received money from West Germany in the past because they claim that they were arrested and put in concentration camps. All this is explained in detail in my book.
TBR: Have you ever been to Auschwitz or related sites?
PLEVRIS: Of course. I have been to Dachau, Auschwitz, all of them. There are no gas chambers in any of them.
TBR: Is it illegal in Greece to question the “Holocaust” theory?
PLEVRIS: No. Absolutely not. In Germany and in Austria they feel guilty for the Jews, and there it is illegal. Not here. Here we have freedom of speech. You are free to express your ideas and to state your opinion.
TBR: Did not the ancient Greeks almost invent freedom of speech?
PLEVRIS: Yes, of course. Don’t forget that here we believe in dialogue. You speak, I give my answer, and we discuss things. Many times I called on the Jews to come on my TV program to speak in a public, free dialogue, and they refused. Why? Because they know they are wrong and I am right. And it’s not only about the Jewish “Holocaust” of World War II. Most of my book involves the crimes the Jews committed against the Greeks throughout history.
TBR: WWII was a terrible time. How many Greeks died in the war?
PLEVRIS: Half a million; 520,000 to be exact.
TBR: What other holocausts have the Greek people survived?
PLEVRIS: We had the 1922 genocide in Pontus, the area around the Black Sea. Around Greece there are these states — Albania, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Turkey — and all these states were founded on Greek territory. They enslaved the Greek population. So, we Greeks have had genocides. Real genocides!
And no one gave us any money!
The Jewish “Holocaust” is for me an enterprise. It has an economic goal. The Jews gained money from it. Thirty years ago, I remember, it was written that 4 million Jews were killed at Auschwitz. Later, they changed this to 1 million. But the Jews collected money for 4 million.
LD: Actually, the official figures for Holocaust victims at Auschwitz were revised downward from 4 million to 1.5 million in 1989. So it was officially admitted at that point that the figure of 2.5 million needed to be subtracted from the 6 million figure. Incredibly, no such subtraction has ever taken place. The magic 6 million figure remains unaltered. And merely to question it is an imprisonable offense in seventeen countries: Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, and Switzerland.
TBR: The Roman historian Dio Cassius said in the 2nd century A.D. that the Jews killed 220,000 Greeks in Cyrene and 240,000 in Cyprus. What do you think about that?
PLEVRIS: Yes, it is not only Dio Cassius who said this. Modern historians say it too, including Edward Gibbon in his Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. It’s a fact. Maybe the numbers ar a bit exaggerated, but it is a fact.
TBR: What details of the Holocaust myth do you call into question?
PLEVRIS: First of all we have to use common sense. If the Jews are telling the truth, if they are right in what they say, they don’t need to legally penalize so-called “Holocaust Deniers.” If you’re right about something and someone denies it, you can prove that he is wrong. But the Jews use the penal law. This is unbelievable to me. I can say that the American Revolution never happened. Does that mean that I should be condemned for saying it? That I should go to jail because I expressed my opinion?
If the Jews are right, they are obliged to accept a public dialogue. This they refuse. It’s not only forbidden to deny that the “Holocaust” occurred as such — even to doubt it is a crime! In Germany and Austria you are not even allowed to express doubts about the “Holocaust.” Unfortunately, there is no more any Deutschland. Instead there is “Judenland.” If you go to Germany, you will see “Holocaust” monuments and memorials everywhere.
TBR: Are there any other specific details you call into question?
PLEVRIS: Look, I always use either scientific arguments or common sense. The Germans came to Greece in 1941. They went to some town in Greece. They arrested some Jews. They put them in train cars. They sent them somewhere into Poland or Germany, where there was a concentration camp. For what reason? The Jews say: “to kill us.”
I’m asking: Why didn’t they kill them in Greece?
Is it necessary to go through all the trouble of organizing the camps, and the trains, and all that? So it comes down to common sense.
It just doesn’t add up.
TBR: How has your latest book “The Jews: The Whole Truth” been received by the Greek-reading audience?
PLEVRIS: Now, after three years, it is in its fourth edition.
TBR: It is indeed a massive work.
PLEVRIS: Yes, it definitively closes the case. And don’t forget that my victory in the Greek court is final. There are no more appeals. Also, this is the first time in Europe that the Jews lost a case.
TBR: How do you feel about the way that the Israelis have been treating the Palestinians, Lebanese, and others in the Middle East, such as the holocaust against the people of Gaza?
PLEVRIS: I have inside my book more than 50 photos, unbelievable photos of Jews killing children — and they wanted to kill them. If you look, all the proof is inside the book. Of course, this is a war crime. But there is no new Nuremberg for Zionists unfortunately.
TBR: I really was struck by the photograph in your book of the two Palestinian children throwing rocks at an oncoming tank. That picture speaks a thousand words.
PLEVRIS: Yes, exactly. And don’t forget that anyway, had the Jews not crucified Jesus, no one would know anything about them. No one would mention them…. What we do know for sure about the Jews is that they were slaves: slaves to the Assyrians, slaves to the Babylonians, slaves to the Persians, slaves to the Greeks, slaves to the Romans, slaves to the Byzantines, slaves to the Arabs, slaves to the Turks, slaves to the Germans. And now they have a state, not because they are able to have a state on their own, but because the United States helped them. This is clear. If the United States dumps them, they will be slaves to someone else!
TBR: Are you aware of the Israeli attacks on the USS Liberty in 1967 and on Rachel Corrie and other Americans, as well as some Europeans and Japanese newsmen? Can you comment on that?
PLEVRIS: Yes. For the USS Liberty I have a chapter in my book, because the Jews don’t have any gratitude for the American help. There are many Jews convicted as spies against the United States. I believe that the Jews—and when I say “Jews” I don’t mean ALL Jewish people, because there are also good Jews. I am referring to the Zionists: the Jewish Zionists. So, if there is a Jew that does not believe in the Talmud, of course I don’t have a problem with him. But I don’t personally know a Jew who does not believe in the Talmud, and who does not believe in the chosen people.
During my trial I said to the court: “Look, these people claim that they are God’s chosen people, and they have the nerve to accuse me of being a racist! How can I be the racist here when it is they who claim that they, the Jews, are chosen by God?”
Anyway, when I say something I try always to prove it. For this reason, the solution of all these cases concerning the Jews is only one: free public dialogue. Everything in the open, everything in the light. Everything clear, to see it and discuss it. The Jews, they refuse. For this reason I suspect something is wrong. Because they refuse free dialogue … They refuse!
TBR: Apparently the Jews claimed that they were somehow being defamed by your book. Is that right?
PLEVRIS: The president [of the court] was against me. After the process, I was condemned to a suspended sentence of 14 months in prison. After this, because this judge acted absolutely illegally, I made a counterattack against him — and now he has been kicked out of the justice department! I made the appeal, and it was in a superior court of five judges and a prosecutor. The five judges unanimously ruled that I was not guilty!
Never in my book did I say, “Do something illegal! Be violent against Jews!” Never! I spoke only the truth, and I proved that I spoke the truth. And if the Jews were able to discuss my book and prove that I am wrong, they would do it. But they are not able to prove it. They cannot prove it. Because it’s the truth I speak. So they followed legal proceedings. And they lost — they totally and definitely lost!
TBR: What was the role of Ms Andrea Gilbert, head of the Central Board of Jewish—
PLEVRIS: Please! . . . I have no wish to enter into discussion about a lesbian! A woman who will not respect her own nature is unlikely to have any respect for the truth! Not only is she a lesbian, she is also the president of the Lesbian Federation.
LD: An additional black mark against Plevris is that he is an unabashed “homophobe”.
TBR: So what is this Central Jewish Council of Greece?
PLEVRIS: The Jewish Council went against me. They said: “When Plevris published this book. . . . after its publication. . . . someone went to the city of Patras and desecrated the Jewish cemetery there by painting swastikas on the Jewish graves.”
I asked “Has the perpetrator been arrested?” He had been arrested, and he was the son of a rabbi!
TBR: So it was reported in the news that he was the perpetrator?
PLEVRIS: Absolutely. He was an agent provocateur!
TBR: So you do not sanction or incite anyone to violent acts against the Jews? Nor do you justify similar practices that others have done in past?
PLEVRIS: I don’t agree with violence. When you have 100 percent truth on your side, you don’t need violence. Anyway, what violence? The Jews accuse us of violence? They are the first teachers of violence! Look at what is happening in Palestine!
“The best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed.”
— Rabbi ben Yohai in the Talmud, quoted also in the Jewish Encyclopaedia.
TBR: It seems your enemies were extremely selective in what they quoted from your works. For example, I believe your most notorious book contains extensive quotations from the Talmud. And a huge stock of historical evidence of Jewish anti-Christian hatred. Of this, they said not a word. Can you comment on that?
PLEVRIS: The Jews are afraid of any public dialogue. I mentioned that earlier.
TBR: How do you see the political future of Greece?
PLEVRIS: The future of Greece is very difficult because we have many problems. Two million immigrants have come into Greece: from Albania, from Pakistan, from Africa, from everywhere. They came to Greece, and we have a big problem. They have changed the national composition of our country.
TBR: What is the population of Greece currently?
PLEVRIS: We are 11 million, and almost 20% are foreigners. We don’t want them. We don’t accept them. They have to return to their countries. But the political parties play the game of parliamentarianism and human rights. Human rights for the others, not for the Greeks. There is a racism in Greece from the foreigners against the native Greek population.
TBR: I understand that you wrote about the “Holocaust” in 1968. Can you tell us more about that book?
PLEVRIS: The book’s title, as I mentioned earlier, was The Myth. This offered evidence and proofs that what the Jews claim about the Holocaust never actually happened.
TBR: So, at the time you wrote this book in 1968 you were one of the pioneers on this subject worldwide?
PLEVRIS: Yes, that’s true. Of course, the Jews complained. But I didn’t care about them. I was very strong then. I was General Secretary of the Ministry of National Security, and I didn’t pay any attention to them at all. Also I was only 28 years old. When you are 28, you’re not afraid of anyone!
TBR: Have your Revisionist books been translated into other languages, and do you have plans to translate them into English?
PLEVRIS: No, only The Myth has been translated into German and Arabic. I want to translate my other works into English, but the work of every day has not given me the opportunity.
TBR: How well has your book “The Jews: The Whole Truth” been received?
PLEVRIS: I think about 20,000 to 30,000 copies have been sold.
TBR: Is there anything else you would like to say for our audience, which is mostly American?
PLEVRIS: Yes. Of course, we belong to different nations, but most of us are white. But white, red, yellow or black, our race is the first thing we have to keep intact. The Jews want all the non-Jews to be blended into a “universal goy.” I am not a racist under the bad meaning of the word, because it is not by my choice, or the choice of any mortal, that we have people being mostly black in Africa, mostly yellow in Asia, and mostly white in Europe and North America. Rather, it is the natural order of things for the races to be geographically separated. So, the first thing we have to protect, for all non-Jews, is our race: our right to be white, yellow, black or whatever race we are.
TBR: Mr. Plevris, thank you very much for your time.
236 references to 6,000,000 Jews prior to the Nuremberg Trial announcement. Source
The erudite internet writer known as “Toshiro” has compiled a list of 236 references found in newspapers, magazines and books — spanning 45 years, from 1900 to 1945 — in which Jews have claimed that SIX MILLION Jews were (a) about to be killed, (b) were in the process of being killed, or (c) had been killed.
The words have been repeated like a mantra, a numerological litany from which there is no escape. As there is naturally much repitition, we select here only a handful of these references just to give the reader an idea of the intense process of mass hypnosis that started roughly in 1900 and has been continuing relentlessly for over a hundred years.
Reader, don’t skip.
Read every word — and prepare to be mesmerized:
1900 – Stephen S. Wise, New York Times, June 11, 1900 “There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism.”
1902 – Encyclopaedia Britannica, 10th Edition, Vol. 25, 1902, page 482 “While there are in Russia and Rumania six millions of Jews who are being systematically degraded …”
1903 – The Jewish Criterion (Pittsburgh), September 18th, 1903, page 6 “… six million downtrodden brethren.”
1911 – Max Nordeau, The Jewish Chronicle (London), August 18th, 1911, page 14 “… the downfall of six million creatures … for no war has ever yet destroyed six million human lives.”
1911 – The Jewish Criterion (Pittsburgh), August 25th, 1911 “… six million Jews are still groaning under the most terrible yoke.”
1915 – New York Times, January 14th, 1915, page 3 “In the world today there are about 13,000,000 Jews, of whom more than 6,000,000 are in the heart of the war zone; Jews whose lives are at stake and who today are subjected to every manner of suffering and sorrow … “
1915 – The Sun (NY), June 6, 1915, section 5, page 1 “Six million Jews, one-half of the Jewish people throughout the world, are being persecuted, hounded, humiliated, tortured, starved. … six million Jews in Russia … are being tortured so mercilessly.”
1915 – The Jewish Criterion (Pittsburgh), June 25th, 1915 “The annihilation of the six million Jews now congregated in the Russian domains goes on in a well defined and systematic manner.
1915 – New York Tribune, October 14th, 1915 “What the Turks are doing to Armenians is child’s play compared to what Russia is doing to six million Jews, her own subjects.”
1915 – The Mercury, December 4th, 1915 “… six millions of Russian and Polish Jews are to-day the most pitiable victims of that race hatred and that race fanaticism which have been the creed of Germany … “
1916 – The Jews in the Eastern War Zone, The American Jewish Committee, 1916 “… where six million human beings guilty only of adherence to the Jewish faith are compelled to live out their lives in squalor and misery, in constant terror of massacre … estimated at six million or more … of these six million people … a kind of prison with six million inmates … The persons most affected, the six million Jews of Russia … The Jews are loyal and brave, and it is most inadvisable to pursue a policy which might convert six million subjects into enemies. … the six million Jews of Russia still continued … nearly three of the six million …”
1916 – New York Times, February 28th, 1916 “Nearly six million Jews are ruined in the greatest moral and material misery; millions of them are refugees, dependent upon the good will of their brethren.”
1916 – The Jewish Criterion (Pittsburgh), March 3rd, 1916 “Nearly six million Jews are ruined.”
1916 – The Jewish Criterion (Pittsburgh), March 31st, 1916, page 6 “Position of the Jews in Russia. The Jews in Russia, numbering about six million, are denied full political and civil rights and are economically oppressed.”
1918 – The Columbus Jewish Chronicle, June 28th, 1918, page 1 “Claims Palestine Has Room For Six Million … “It is quite possible for Palestine to find room for five to six millions… 800,000 hectares will suffice to produce the food of six millions of people,”
1918 – The Jewish Criterion (Pittsburgh), September 5th, 1918 “… Russia, where the bulk of the Jewish people to the number of well over six million still dwell, is a land of blood and midnight darkness.”
1919 – San Antonio Express, April 9th, 1919, page 12 “At no other time in the history of the Jewish people has the need been so great as now. Six million of our brothers and sisters are dying of starvation. The entire race is threatened with extinction.”
1919 – San Francisco Chronicle, October 19th, 1919, page 18 “6,000,000 JEWS IN BREAD LINE, STRAUS WRITES. More Than Third of Entire Race in World Reduced to Despair in Europe. … Six million Jews, out of the 16,000,000 in the world … “
1919 – The American Hebrew, October 31st, 1919, page 582 “The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop! From across the sea six million men and women call to us for help … Within them reside the illimitable possibilities for the advancement of the human race as naturally would reside in six million human beings…. In this catastrophe, when six million human beings are being whirled toward the grave by a cruel and relentless fate, only the most idealistic promptings of human nature should sway the heart and move the hand. Six million men and women are dying from lack of the necessaries of life […] bigoted lust for Jewish blood. In this threatened holocaust of human life in the name of the humanity of Moses to six million famished men and women. Six million men and women are dying … six million Jewish men and women are starring across the seas …”
1919 – Gouvernur Free Press, November 12th, 1919 “Six Million Men and Women Are Dying… Won’t You Help Them? … From across the sea six million men and women call to us for help … in six million human beings … In this catastrophe, when six million human beings are being whirled toward the grave by a cruel and relentless fate … Six million men and women are dying … Six million men and women are dying … Because of this war for Democracy six million Jewish men and women are starving across the seas … Six million men and women of the race that helped do the greatest of the world’s work are falling into the grave! … six million famished men and women now turn mute eyes of appeal … “
1936 – Chaim Weizmann: Reden und Aufsatze 1901-1936. jud. Bucherverlag Erwin Lowe, Berlin 1937, page 272-4 “It is no exaggeration to say that six million Jews are sentenced to be imprisoned in this part of the world, where they are unwanted, and for whom the countries are divided into those, where they are unwanted, and those, where they are not admitted. … It is ultimately the fate of six million people!”
1937 – Jewish Western Bulletin, December 31st, 1937 “The number six million is often used to describe the Jewish population of Central and Eastern Europe.”
1938 – New York Times, January 9th, 1938, page 12 “PERSECUTED JEWS SEEN ON INCREASE. 6,000,000 VICTIMS NOTED. … Five to six million in all are today the victims of governmental anti-Semitism … “
1938 – New York Times, February 23rd, 1938, page 23 “A depressing picture of 6,000,000 Jews in Central Europe deprived of protection or economic opportunities, slowly dying of starvation, all hope gone … Now anti-Semitism has spread to thirteen European nations, and threatens the very existence of millions of Jews.”
1938 – The Jewish Criterion (Pittsburgh), April 1st, 1938, page 15 “I shall not comment upon the first except to remind you that six million Jews in Europe are struggling between life and death.”
1938 – The Guardian, April 4th, 1938, page 11 “Six million Jews at this moment are trapped like rats … “
1939 – The Jewish Criterion, April 7th, 1939, page 4 “Not in Hitler’s Hands, In Yours … The Fate Of Six Million European Jews”
1939 – The Niagara Falls Gazette, May 1st, 1939, page 15 “ITHACA RABBI SAYS FREE JEWS MUST AID HARASSED BRETHREN Six Million Jews Are Refugees, Members of B’nai B’rith Lodges Told. Three-eights of the world’s Jewish population of 16,000,000 persons, or approximately 6,000,000 persons, are potential refugees. … Rabbis Fischoff declared that the 6,000,000 Jews or Christians of Jewish extraction are in real of imminent danger due to the spread of totalitarianism in the world.”
1940 – New York Times, June 25th, 1940, page 4 “Six million Jews in Europe are doomed to destruction, if the victory of Nazis should be final. … The chances for mass emigration and resettlement of European Jewry seems to be remote, and European Jews face the danger of physical annihilation. Even the 4,000,000 Jews under Soviet rule, although free from racial discrimination, are not safe in the event of a final Nazi victory.”
1940 – Joplin News Herald (Missouri), June 25th, 1940, page 3 “Six million Jews in Europe are doomed to destruction.”
1940 – Ohio Jewish Chronicle, June 28th, 1940, page 1 “The lives of six million Jews have been uprooted by the psychopathic, political ambitions of totalitarian leaders.”
1942 – New York Times, December 13th, 1942, page 21 “Rabbi Israel Goldstein in Temple B’nai Jeshurun, Eighty-eighth Street, near Broadway, declared: “Authenticated reports point to 2,000,000 Jews who have already been slain by all manner of satanic barbarism, and plans for the total extermination of all Jews upon whom the Nazis can lay their hands. The slaughter of a third of the Jewish population in Hitler’s domain and the threatened slaughter of all is a holocaust without parallel.”
1942 – The Courier-Mail (Brisbane), December 19th, 1942 “GERMAN HORROR CRIMES; ALLIES PROMISE JUSTICE. Statements issued simultaneously in London, Washington and Moscow, told at German barbarity and of proof of the Nazi determination to exterminate Jews. … Hitler’s decision to exterminate the Jews … It is estimated that there are between five and six million Jews in Occupied Europe … Nazi Slaughter House. … Hitler’s oft-repeated intention to exterminate the Jewish people in Europe.”
1942 – Barrier Miner (Australia), December 23rd, 1942 “Mr. Silverman suggested that Australia and Canada could each absorb 6,000,000 Jews. … MOST ARE DOOMED … The Jewish Congress declares that 2,000,000 Jews have been exterminated so far.”
1942 – The Massacre of a People: What the Democracies Can Do, 1943.
The following article is an except from “Let My People Go,” a pamphlet written on Christmas Day, 1942, in London. “Of the six million Jews or so who were living at the outbreak of the war in what is at present Nazi-occupied Europe, a high proportion—between one and two million—have been deliberately murdered by the Nazis and their satellites. … Unless something effective is done, within a very few months these six million Jews will all be dead,”
1943 – Toledo Blade, August 27th, 1943 “3,000,000 Jews Left In Europe – 5,300,000 Reported To Have Perished. Europe’s Jewish population has been reduced from 8,300,000 to 3,000,000 during the 10 years the Nazis have been in power, says the Institute of Jewish Affairs.”
1944 – The Leader, November 28th, 1944 “Russian “Black Book” lists German crimes. The first volume of a five-volume Russian “black book” recording the documentary form of the German massacre of approximately 6,000,000 European Jews has been completed by the Soviet state publishing house … The five-volume work is under the general editorship of Ilya Ehrenburg, noted Soviet writer and war correspondent, with an editorial board that includes poet-playwright Kanstantin [Konstantin] Simonov, writer Vsevold [Vsevolod] Ivanov and poetess Vera Imber. Editors of the work -which will be published in both Russian and English in press runs of hundreds of thousands of copies- estimate from data now available that the Germans killed between 5,000,000 and 6,000,000 Jews in Russia, Poland and western Europe. They believe an additional 500,000 now are being murdered in Hungary.”
1944 – Ilya Ehrenburg, Soviet War News, December 22nd, 1944 “In the regions they seized, Germans killed all Jews, from the old folks to infants in arms. Ask any German prisoners why his fellow countrymen annihilated six million innocent people … “
1945 – New York Times, January 8th, 1945 “6,000,000 JEWS DEAD. The Jewish population in Europe has been reduced from 9,500,000 in 1939 to 3,500,000. Of the 6,000,000 European Jews who have died, 5,000,000 had lived in the countries under Hitler’s occupation.”
1945 – Joseph Thon, president of the National Organization of Polish Jews in America, March 22nd, 1945:
“I accuse the whole German people that in the years 1939 to 1945 they slaughtered upward of 15,000,000 men, among which there were 6,000,000 Jews. … The German people murdered, in cold blood, in excess of 6,000,000 European Jews, among them over 3,000,000 Polish Jews.”
1945 – Ilya Ehrenburg, The Advertiser, March 27th, 1945 “… the Germans tortured the last handful of Jews. The Germans killed six million Jews -all the Jews of Poland, Hungary, the Ukraine, Lithuania, Byelo-Russia, West Europe and of course Germany.”
1945 – Army News (Darwin, Australia), April 11th, 1945 “NAZIS HAVE MURDERED SIX MILLION JEWS. Of a population of 16 million Jews in the world before the war, more than six million had been murdered by the Nazis.”
1945 – The Observer, October 14th, 1945, page 5 “At the entrance to its office, a large poster asks the searching question: Six million Jews have been murdered-world, where is thy conscience?”
1945 – The Observer, November 2nd, 1945, page 10 “The horror of the Middle Ages with all forms of torture was brought down upon European Israel with the result that six millions of Jews perished.”
Could I but span the legion hours of Time, my love,
Finding across the waves of the boundless deep
The words you pen in verse for only me, my love—
The words you write and rhyme for me to keep;
Could I but touch your soul and feel your life, my love; Could I but reach my hand for yours to hold; Could I but bridge the leagues and latitudes and swells, my love; Could I your form into myself enfold…
I’d press my face and flesh into your warmth, my love, And anoint your breasts with kisses and red wine. We’d dwell upon the sands and seas of Love, my love, And forever I’d be yours — and you’d be mine!
Source Edited and presented with pictures, captions and added inserts
by Lasha Darkmoon
THE GRAND MASTER AND HIS MINIONS
It used to be that foreign threats were advertised as the main reason to send our young men off to war to defend our country. Amazing though it seems, we used to believe those stories. Many of our fathers and grandfathers died defending that principle.
Now, all that has changed. The threat is no longer some faraway enemy. The main enemy to peace in the world and security at home has become our own government.
Actions speak louder than words. The words our government speaks do not match the actions it takes.
It purchases uncountable rounds of hollow point ammunition and fancy new tanks for local police departments; at the same time it clamors about the need to take all guns away from the American people.
It conducts a program to rain down poison aluminum nanoparticles that sicken and kill both land and people, but refuses to admit such a program exists.
It approves genetically modified food to be consumed by the public, when all independent medical experts — the ones not paid to lie — know only too well that these foods are making people sick.
It allows — in fact, encourages — our police to kill innocent people with impunity. Meanwhile, it lets the guilty criminals slide off the hook. The puppets will do what they’re told, provided the puppeteers who control them give them a slice of the loot.
Our government regularly stages false flag terror events in order to have the excuse of passing draconian new laws that make a mockery of our Constitutional rights.
Its own intelligence agencies distribute drugs to gangs in order to arrest those who buy the drugs. These entrapped drug users are then put in prison and used by the government as slave labor: as a workforce whose wages are so ridiculously low that even the lowest paid workers in China receive more money for their labors.
It creates new diseases in government laboratories and secretly spreads them around populated areas, meanwhile commissioning “cures” made by pharmaceutical companies that charge exorbitant amounts of money — out of all proportion to what it costs to produce the actual drugs. Needless to say, the drugs are often pretty useless — or they cause other medical conditions and debilitating side effects that in turn require further treatment.
“The drugs themselves cause diseases . . . “
Our government in addition stages foreign wars that are of zero benefit to the American people, meanwhile enriching the Khazars who have taken over the running of our country.
It allows these foreigners to steal billions at a time in order to give bonuses to the people who are doing the stealing.
It blows up skyscrapers in the middle of our biggest city and then blames it on people who have neither the inclination nor the ability to have done it.
It encourages unrestrained immigration, with lucrative incentives to foreigners to water down the voting pool. At the same time, it lets its own citizens lose their homes — because it has shipped all their jobs overseas.
It protects food and medicine manufacturers from malpractice lawsuits, while demanding that people buy expensive healthcare insurance policies that will deliberately make them sick.
It allows its own officials to break the law and sets up innocent people with false testimony to put them in prison.
It urges us to vote for the candidate of our choice, but restricts those choices to corrupt yes-men they choose; nor will it tell us about the precise procedures of how the votes get counted. If the vote goes against them, they fix the voting machines.
It tells the media exactly what to report, and what not to report — and the media robots eagerly oblige.
It endorses movies that depict innocent ethnic groups as vicious terrorists and praises its own vicious killers as noble heroes protecting our freedoms.
It sends billions of dollars to foreign governments but gives nothing to restore America’s decaying cities.
It promotes federal employees who lie about what they do, but imprisons and tortures whistleblowers like Bradley Manning for telling the truth.
It lets a private company — the Federal Reserve — print all the money, because it makes politicians and the elite one-percenters rich beyond the dreams of avarice, and the rest of us poor.
It furloughs those protecting our borders and furnishes guns and ammunition to the foreign criminals delivering drugs and mayhem across those unguarded borders.
It tells you the unemployment rate is going down and the stock market is going up, but fewer people than ever have decent jobs and the junk food they are forced to eat is mostly poisoned.
It says they may kill whomever they want to, but that the people they intend to attack may not fight back. The government may attack its own citizens with impunity, but self-defense is illegal.
It promotes those who say they are willing to shoot their fellow Americans, but denies veterans the right to own guns on the grounds that they have become mentally unstable. How did they become mentally unstable? From serving in unnecessary wars on behalf of Israel in which they were ordered to rape children before they murdered them — and to torture their victims, as at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, for the sheer hell of it.
It poisons children at birth with vaccinations they don’t need, and it steals children from their parents. The children abducted by the state, from perfectly good homes and from loving parents, are then put in foster homes where sexual abuse is common. Sometimes the children are even farmed out to elite pedophiles. And no one ever gets caught or pays the price.
It controls the weather with high tech devices and creates storms that destroy entire neighborhoods, preventing help from reaching the displaced victims who are starving and freezing.
It sends people to college who can’t even read, but if these morons say the right thing and become pliant puppets, they will jump into high political office in no time at all.
It kills the people who made this country great, and it rewards the people who are helping to destroy it.
Who will protect us from own government?
Who will protect us from America which is now terrorizing the entire world — and is very likely, at any moment, to start mass murdering American citizens in their own country?
“In the last ten years America has morphed into far more than a mere police state. It is now a legalized crime mafia. There is only one axis of evil now, America: and all America’s allies, including the UN and NATO, are spokes on the same wheel. They have becomes disciples of the devil, acolytes of the Great Satan. We are now, all of us without exception, under the dominion of evil.” — Lasha Darkmoon, Diary of a Dissident
Edited and presented with pictures, captions and inserted comments by Lasha Darkmoon.
PARALYZED BY HORROR
AS THE WORLD GOES DOWN THE DRAIN
WE REFUSE TO SEE THE SIMPLE SOLUTION TO OUR PROBLEMS
U G L Y E M P I R E
“The people of North America and Europe now accept a level of ugliness in their daily lives which is almost without precedent in the history of Western civilization. Most of us have become so inured, that the death of millions from starvation and disease draws from us no more than a sigh, or a murmur of protest. Our own city streets, home to legions of the homeless, are ruled by Dope Inc., the largest industry in the world, and on those streets Americans now murder each other at a rate not seen since the Dark Ages.”
It seems too late to reverse course now. We get up each morning and tell ourselves nothing has changed, go to work, and get lost in the details of the day. Of course it’s a lie. Because everything has changed.
Russian troops wearing US uniforms patrol the highways in Tennessee. Much of the Arctic Ocean is open water in the dead of winter. The president can kill anyone he wants to at any time in any place.
Our lives are not the same as we remember them in our dreams. Righteous writers construct plans to fix the problems. Then, if you’re old enough, you remember that once something goes away, it’s gone, never to return. Extinction is forever. There is never any going back, only forward.
“Forward” today looks like FEMA camps for political dissidents. Anyone with a still functioning brain is a dissident these days.
“Forward” today looks like certain cancer, if not from the food you eat, then from the medicine they prescribe for you and the very air you breathe.
“At the same time, a thousand smaller horrors are so commonplace as to go unnoticed. Our children spend as much time sitting in front of television sets as they do in school, watching with glee, scenes of torture and death which might have shocked an audience in the Roman Coliseum.”
It seems we had a chance to fix things. For years we thought we were in control of our own lives. But perhaps we never were in control. In any case, we are no longer in control.
People who raise profound objections to the status quo simply disappear. They are never seen again. The lucky ones only lose their jobs — and their ability to feed their families.
How this all came to pass is no mystery. Everyone is still doing the same thing today that got us into this mess in the first place. The things we rated as important kept us from perceiving what was actually happening. In many cases, made dizzy by addictions that we told ourselves were merely personal preferences, entertainment, gluttony, and recreational sex became our top priorities.
Freedom sunk to the bottom of the list, below even housework, not to mention honor and dignity and duty.
So when you contemplate how most of society—at least in pampered, deluded America—acts today, you realize that while everything has changed politically, freedom to say and do what you want now incurs profound penalties.
The behavioral characteristics of most Americans have not changed one little bit.
Rather than doing things for themselves, Americans want everything done for them. And the government has been only too happy to oblige.
Which is why it’s too late to reverse course.
Dependent as we have become on government systems, we no longer have the ability to fend for ourselves, never mind survive in the wild when the supermarkets are closed for good.
The past, in which we at least thought our choices were free and unencumbered, is long gone. And the present is terminally ominous.
You see it in the opposition to these terrible trends. “Oh, I’ll make it to the protest if my entertainment needs don’t get in the way…” People’s preferences toward trivia, to which they have become so addicted, have taken precedence over the very systems that help to keep them alive.
Among the very few who have broken through the layers of deception and identified the chief culprits in the increasing robotization of the world, even those few prefer trivia over substance. This is what they have been taught is important. Reinforced in their delusions by the attitudes of their peers, they are unable to see the larger picture. Their myopia costs them their lives.
Lately this has been illustrated by the incessant infighting among people who have the same objective. They allow their trivial differences to get in the way of achieving their common purpose. It is a classic case of style over substance. The world is thus convulsed in disorder, roiled in chaos.
I’m not talking about the brain dead idiots who still think Muslims did 9/11. Or who believe that it’s okay to consume the poisoned swill doled out at fast food joints. I’m not even talking of the superficial dolts who think that petitioning their corrupt legislators will somehow slow down our downward slide into societal extinction.
No, I’m talking about the ones who have a clear picture of who the real criminals are: these designers of our misery who laugh at their poisoned victims as they steal the last dollars of the poor: the helpless widows and widowers, the distraught pensioners, the homeless ones huddled under bridges, the endless legions of the dispossessed . . . and those who throw themselves from high windows after mortgage foreclosures and the confiscation of their life savings by Jewish bankers.
AN UGLY LIFE . . . AN UGLY DEATH
“. . . Music is everywhere, almost unavoidable—but it does not uplift, nor even tranquilize—it claws at the ears, sometimes spitting out an obscenity. Our plastic arts are ugly, our architecture is ugly, our clothes are ugly. There have certainly been periods in history where mankind has lived through similar kinds of brutishness, but our time is crucially different. Our post-World War II era is the first in history in which these horrors are completely avoidable. Our time is the first to have the technology and resources to feed, house, educate, and humanely employ every person on earth, no matter what the growth of population. Yet, when shown the ideas and proven technologies that can solve the most horrendous problems, most people retreat into implacable passivity. We have become not only ugly, but impotent.”
How anyone in these toxic times can fail to see the Jewish fingerprints over all these atrocities is beyond me: the theft of trillions of dollars from mostly-now-unemployed Americans to fund wars that benefit no one but the very rich, the worthless drugs prescribed by pill-pushing doctors, the bogus curricula designed by cynical educators, the perverse proclivities of lawyers who work for each other instead of their clients.
To see all these things and refuse to see the obvious—the hidden hand of Big Jewry stirring the witch’s cauldron and frothing the deadly brew—is beyond human understanding. I am baffled and perplexed. Truly, I am poleaxed.
This disease of cutthroat selfishness extends even to some of the brightest critics who see the problems, can diagnose them accurately, yet let themselves be derailed from courses of effective action by their stupid and delusional belief systems.
These schisms prevent the emergence of an effective opposition to this sinister kosher force that is—no exaggeration—methodically exterminating all natural life on this planet and replacing it with synthetic, counterfeit versions of the same items.
The bare facts are as follows: the Jews promised, in their Holy Book, the Talmud, to kill or enslave everyone in the world who is not Jewish. This is not just some quaint ethnic ritual performed only on the Sabbath or at obscure social functions. It is not an allegory or figure of speech. It is genuine. It is for real. It is a philosophy of distilled hatred. It is, quite literally, planning our collective death.
Nearly three thousand years of this very same antisocial behavior—based on the principle “The goyim are cattle and deserve to be killed”—has been prevented from leaking into your consciousness. This is because the Jews, for at least the past two hundred years, have owned or controlled most of the world’s media. They decide what is allowed into your minds.
Failure to see all this has made most of us unwitting accomplices in the destruction the Jews have wreaked on ordinary people in every country they have infected with their uncontrolled rapacity.
The total annihilation we now face, the destruction of the environment which now has reputable scientists predicting the end of all life on this planet within the foreseeable future—all this we must place at the door of the traditional Enemy of Mankind. They are to blame. And we are to blame for letting them lead us to the edge of the abys.
The answer to these impending catastrophes is not to try to counteract them by quibbling on the finer points of theology, but to put aside our differences and confront the common enemy of the human race. With all the force we can muster, we must do this. Not for our own sakes alone, but on behalf of our children.
Will we do it? History says we won’t.
In which case, the future of humanity will be ruled by these conscienceless robots who have no idea of the meaning of beauty: of the higher virtues and the nobler aspirations that make life worthwhile and elevate us above the level of mere beasts.
This is America under Jewish domination . . . and it’s going to get worse . . .
How “great” is America now that it has become a Jewish slave colony? If you want to know the answer to this question, click HERE
This 3-minute video will shatter all your illusions…
John Kaminski (email him) is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.
A rebuttal of the recent essay on this site entitled, Hitler was a Zionist Stooge.
Was Hitler a Zionist Stooge?
By John Friend
Perhaps no other political figure and period of history is as misunderstood as Adolf Hitler and his rise to power and reign as the Führer of National Socialist Germany. Confused and oftentimes disingenuous conspiracy historians and alternative media personalities present a wide variety ofinterpretations of Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany, with many claiming Hitler was some sort of secret “Rothschild operative” collaborating with the Jewish international bankers as an agent of Zionist interests in the Middle East, as J. Speer Williams has recently argued. These alternative “conspiracy industry”-type theories are as absurd and baseless as the mainstream version of Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany as the embodiment of evil, hell bent on conquering first Europe, then the world, exterminating all Jews, gypsies, and other scapegoated and “persecuted” groups in the process.Williams begins his recent essay Hitler was a Zionist Stooge this way:
The International Zionists are led by a dark force with an intelligent mentality, but which is totally bereft of compassion, empathy, or basic wisdom.But since such an intellect is unfathomable to most human minds, I know of no one who can give us all the reasons for Zionism bringing Adolf Hitler to power and then financing the German Nazi war machine. But the fact that it was done is clearly provable.The financing of Hitler and his war powers was largely handled by the old Max/Paul Warburg controlled Mendelsohn Bank of Amsterdam (all Zionists) and the Schroeder Bank of Frankfort, London, and New York (all Zionists).
While Williams makes a good point about the nature of international Zionism as representing a “dark force” that is “totally bereft of compassion, empathy, or basic wisdom”, his sophomoric and simplistic contention, without citing any source material or documentation, that a combination of “Zionist” controlled banks in Amsterdam, London, Frankfort, and New York financed Hitler and “his war powers” (whatever that means) is without merit. Williams attempts to convince his readers that Zionist funding of Hitler and the “Nazi war machine” is “clearly provable”, yet provides no evidence whatsoever for his claims. He simply declares it so, and expects everyone to unquestionably follow along. Serious scholars, journalists, and writers provide documentation – using reliable primary and secondary sources – to substantiate their claims. Obviously, J. Speer Williams is not a serious scholar, journalist, or writer.
Hitler and the NSDAP were not, I repeat, were not funded by Jewish or even pro-Zionist sources. They were not “Rothschild agents” or “puppets of the bankers” or “stooges for the Zionists”. They were diametrically opposed to the Jewish supremacist goal of a “New World Order”, which is essentially Jewish domination and subjugation of the entire globe – politically, economically, and culturally – a Jewish Utopia so to speak. Hitler and the National Socialist political movement not only spoke openly and honestly about important subjects, clearly identifying the enemy of all humanity – international Jewry – they made serious moves against this destructive, parasitic network of criminals that had wrecked their country and sought to destroy their people. Hitler and National Socialism were the anti-thesis to Jewish Communism and Jewish plutocratic capitalism, two destructive ideologies Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP clearly recognized as Jewish-inspired philosophies which result in the total destruction of every nation they are practiced in.
Indeed, Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist movement represented the greatest obstacle that has ever manifested against the parasitic, subversive, and destructive nature of the international Jewish criminal cabal largely controlling the West, pushing for their “New World Order” on every front imaginable.
As Veronica Clark explains in her must read article titled Demystification of the Birth and Funding of the NSDAP, Hitler sought to overcome the class antagonism prevalent throughout Germany (and much of Europe) by establishing a political and social order based on merit, rather than class or wealth, and sought to unify German society around their common German heritage and Aryan race. Funding for the NSDAP came from a variety of sources, including membership fees, speaking engagements, newspaper sales, financial contributions from nationalist-minded small businesses and industrialists, and even elements of the upper classes in German society who recognized the threat of Jewish Marxist communism and wanted to see a revitalized, economically and culturally strong Germany once again.
Theodore Abel’s 1938 book, Why Hitler Came Into Power is perhaps the most important, and yet unknown, book exploring the rise of the National Socialist German Worker’s Party and Adolf Hitler. In early 1934, Abel travelled to Germany after convincing the National Socialist government that had recently come to power that Americans, and the world generally, knew far too little about the National Socialist movement, its ideology, its history and rise to power, and its followers. Abel, working under the auspices of Columbia University, proposed an autobiographical essay contest, in which any member or sympathizer of the NSDAP who had joined prior to the party solidifying its political power over the German state in 1933 could submit an essay explaining his or her background, education, experience, and political affiliations for review.
Abel eventually received 683 manuscripts from a wide variety of National Socialist party members and sympathizers, which he breaks down into age distribution, occupation, class affiliation, and date of joining the NSDAP. Statistical charts and other identifying data are broken down for further analysis as an Appendix. Abel notes that 83 manuscripts were eliminated from consideration, either because they were too short in length and lacking in any detail, or because they were submitted by women, whose entries were used for a separate study published independently of Why Hitler Came Into Power. These manuscripts form the basis for Abel’s work, and numerous excerpts are provided throughout the first two parts of the book from members of the NSDAP themselves, offering readers a unique insight into what motivated and inspired these individuals to join the party and embark on what turned out to be a life long struggle.
In 1986, Why Hitler Came Into Power was re-published with a Foreword written by Thomas Childers, who made some profound observations about Abel’s original and unique research into the NSDAP and the rise of Adolf Hitler in Germany. Childers wrote in part:
Abel’s material simply did not fit neatly into the dominate interpretation of National Socialism as a “revolt of the lower middle class.” […]
Abel was struck by the wide variety of motivational factors at work among the respondents, many of which could not be easily subsumed under the interpretive rubric of “lower-middle-class revolt.” […]
These studies have allowed us to identify the social bases of the Nazi following with far greater precision than was ever before possible. Although thematic emphasis and methods differ, these works are in fundamental agreement that support for the NSDAP extended far beyond the lower middle class to elements of the socially established Grossbürgertum (upper middle class) as well as to sizable segments of the blue-collar working class. […]
What attracted members of the upper middle class to the party? Why did many workers turn to the NSDAP? What had drawn them? What role did the NSDAP’s ideological positions play in its popular appeal? How important were Nazi propaganda tactics and organization? These are obviously important questions for any study seeking to explain the sociopolitical dynamics of Nazi success, and it is precisely this set of central issues that Theodore Abel’s work addresses. […]
Abel’s book is comprised of three distinct parts. Part One deals with the history of the NSDAP, with chapters titled The Background of the Hitler Movement, The First Period: 1919 – 1923, The Second Period: 1924 – 1929, and The Third Period: 1930 – 1933, which offer unique insights into the struggles, obstacles, and hardships endured by the NSDAP, and its eventual rise in German politics.
Part Two is analytical in nature, and explains how and why the NSDAP movement gained support. What attracted people to National Socialism? What factors lead to the rise and eventual triumph of the NSDAP in German politics? These and other related questions are addressed in these pages, and help clarify the financing and nature of the National Socialist German Workers Party, as well as its popularity and ability to largely unite all segments of the German nation. Abel breaks Part Two into three chapters: Discontent As a Factor, Ideology As a Factor, and The Why of the Hitler Movement.
Finally, Part Three of the book is comprised of six selected autobiographies of the NSDAP members, published in full. Abel publishes the life stories of a worker, an anti-Semite, a soldier, a middle-class youth, a bank clerk, and a farmer – all chosen “to show, in unified, more realistic form, patterns of National Socialist experience separately analyzed in previous chapters.” These selected manuscripts demonstrate the widespread appeal of National Socialism, which united German nationalists and patriots from all backgrounds, social classes, and education levels. Farmers, merchants, soldiers, veterans, teachers, industrial workers, bureaucrats, professionals, managers, fathers, mothers, children – National Socialism appealed to and sought to unify all segments of the German populace, and was largely successful in doing so, especially once firmly in control of the German state.
By relying on primary source material – authentic autobiographies of NSDAP members and sympathizers – Abel offers historians and other interested parties a unique analysis of the rise of Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP not found elsewhere.
There is also the legend that “The Jewish bankers” or “The Zionist bankers” (used often interchangeably) financed Hitler. Not true. James Pool, in his authoritative work, Who Financed Hitler?, demonstrates quite to the contrary.
In one instance, a Jewish financier in Germany did give money to the Nazi Party–prior to the rise of Adolf Hitler–but those funds were designed to help Hitler’s intra-party opposition to stop Hitler. But despite this fact, some “patriots” still say that “The Jews Backed Hitler.”
Many of those who worship at the altar of this nonsense cite a flagrantly-fraudulent document of shadowy origins entitled Hitler’s Secret Bankers, ostensibly written by one “Sidney Warburg,” one of those “Jewish bankers.” But this document, as we’ve said, is a fraud.
The late Dr. Anthony Sutton’s Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler has promoted this theory, based in part on the Warburg travesty and has given further institutionalization to this mythology–truth be damned.
American banks and corporations did work with the Hitler regime, usually a continuation of previous financial arrangements going back decades, but this was not part of any grand conspiracy to bring Hitler to power. The claim that the Bush family was integral to the rise of Hitler is another myth. Kevin Phillips–no admirer of the Bush dynasty–examines the actual circumstances surrounding the Bush-Hitler scenario in his book, American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush and puts the facts in proper perspective.
Some even go so far as to claim Hitler was in fact Jewish. This slanderous conspiracy theory has been debunked by serious researchers and even mainstream, establishment academics, such as the British historian Ian Kershaw who wrote a bestselling biography of Adolf Hitler titled, Hitler: 1889-1936 Hubris. In the very first chapter Fantasy and Failure, Kershaw thoroughly debunks the false rumor that Hitler himself may have had Jewish ancestry (pg. 7-9):
… [Allegedly] Adolf Hitler’s grandfather was Jewish. Rumours to that effect circulated in Munich cafes in the early 1920s, and were fostered by sensationalist journalism of the foreign press during the 1930s. It was suggested that the name ‘Huttler’ was Jewish, ‘revealed’ that he could be traced to a Jewish family called Hitler in Bucharest, and even claimed that his father had been sired by Baron Rothschild, in whose house in Vienna his grandmother had allegedly spent some time as a servant. But the most serious speculation about Hitler’s supposed Jewish background has occurred since the Second World War, and is directly traceable to the memoirs of the leading Nazi lawyer Governor General of Poland, Hans Frank, dictated in his Nuremberg cell while awaiting hangman. Frank claimed that he had been called in by Hitler towards the end of 1930 and shown a letter from his nephew William Patrick Hitler (the son of his half-brother Alois, who had been briefly married to an Irish woman) threatening, in connection with the press stories circulating about Hitler’s background, to expose the fact that Hitler had Jewish blood flowing in his veins. […]Frank’s story gained wide circulation in the 1950s. But it simply does not stand up.[…] Hans Frank’s memoirs, dictated at a time when he was waiting for the hangman and plainly undergoing psychological crisis, are full of inaccuracies and have to be used with caution. With regard to the story of Hitler’s alleged Jewish grandfather, they are valueless.
Back to Williams’ piece, Hitler was a Zionist Stooge. After claiming that international Jewish bankers in London, Amsterdam, Frankfort and New York financed Hitler and “his war powers” without citing a single source or elaborating on the details of this alleged funding, he goes on to claim that the German chemical giant I.G. Farben was under Zionist control, also implying that this industrial conglomerate was working directly with the Hitler government. Williams mentions that I.G. Farben produced Zyklon B gas used in “Nazi concentration camps” without mentioning that Zyklon B was actually used for health and sanitary reasons, not in some evil plan to systematically murder the Jews and others detained by the German government. Of course, there are no citations to demonstrate the I.G. Farben was indeed under Zionist control or working with the National Socialist government in any nefarious way.
Williams then makes claims I’ve heard before and read on the internet, almost always without a reliable source to back them up — that the Allies deliberately avoided bombing I.G. Farben industrial facilities located in Germany and German-occupied territories. From the article:
During the massive fire bombing of almost all of Germany and many of its innocent citizens, the Farben facilities were carefully spared. One used to be able to go onto the Internet and see aerial photographs of the I.G. Farben plants left whole, while everything else around them had been bombed into ruins.
Again, no citation to back up these contentions. A simple search on Wikipedia for I.G. Farben has this to say:
Facilities during World War II
IG Farben facilities were bombing targets of the Oil Campaign of World War II, and up to 1941, there were 5 Nazi Germany Buna plants that produced Buna N by the Lebedev process.
The Buna Chemical Plant at Dwory was under construction by 1943, after a March 2, 1942 contract with “IG Farbenindustrie AG Auschwitz.” The Buna Werke plant, which produced synthetic oil and rubber (from coal), was the beginning of SS activity and camps near Auschwitz III-Monowitz during the Holocaust. At its peak in 1944, this factory made use of 83,000 slave laborers. Today, the plant operates as “Dwory S.A.”
In addition to the “cavernous” IG Farben building at Frankfurt, a Hoechst AG chemical factory in Frankfurt was bombed by the RAF on September 26, 1944.
Where does Williams, and those who continue to make these claims about I.G. Farben, get their information? Inquiring minds would like to know. What sources document that I.G. Farben was controlled by “Zionist bankers” working with Hitler, and that its industrial facilities were spared from Allied firebombing campaigns?
If Hitler and the NSDAP were “Zionist stooges”, why on earth did they do things like this or this or this? Why did they make movies like The Eternal Jew, exposing the enemies of the German race to their fellow kinsmen? Consider Adolf Hitler’s political testament he dictated shortly before he committed suicide in Berlin in April 1945. Does this man sound like a “Zionist stooge” to you?
More than thirty years have passed since 1914 when I made my modest contribution as a volunteer in the First World War, which was forced upon the Reich.In these three decades love and loyalty to my people have guided all my thoughts, actions and my life. They gave me the strength to make the most difficult decisions ever to confront mortal man. In these three decades I have spent my strength and my health. It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was wanted and provoked solely by international statesmen either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. I have made too many offers for the limitation and control of armaments, which posterity will not be cowardly enough always to disregard, for responsibility for the outbreak of this war to be placed on me. Nor have I ever wished that, after the appalling First World War, there would ever be a second against either England or America. Centuries will go by, but from the ruins of our towns and monuments the hatred of those ultimately responsible will always grow anew against the people whom we have to thank for all this: international Jewry and its henchmen. […]
If Hitler was somehow “in cahoots with the Jews”, why did he say things like this all throughout Mein Kampf and in the various speeches he gave?
The Jews have not the ability which is necessary for the founding of a civilization, for in them there is not, and never has been, that spirit of idealism which is an absolutely necessary element in the higher development of mankind. Therefore, the Jewish intellect will never be constructive, but always destructive. (Chapter XI, pg. 209)
Another claim often made by individuals in Williams’ camp is that somehow Adolf Hitler is the “founder of Israel”, which is an absurd and extremely ignorant claim for a variety of reasons.
It was Britain, through the Balfour Declaration, addressed to none other than Lord Rothschild himself, that initially facilitated the establishment of the illegitimate terrorist state of “Israel”, not Germany. Germany never supported or wanted a Jewish state in Palestine. Hitler and NSDAP policy were primarily concerned with getting the Jews out of Germany (and eventually all of Europe), and did in fact collaborate with Zionist organizations and factions that promoted Jewish emigration to Palestine and the West. They even entered into economic agreements with these organizations to not only facilitate the emigration of Jews from Germany, but also bolster Germans exports. Some German Jews ended up moving to Palestine, many more went to London, Paris, New York, and Hollywood, where with their fellow Jews already in the West they would begin their genetically inspired systematic assault on and subversion of Western culture.
[…] German support for Zionism was not unlimited. Government and Party officials were very mindful of the continuing campaign by powerful Jewish communities in the United States, Britain and other countries to mobilize “their” governments and fellow citizens against Germany. As long as world Jewry remained implacably hostile toward National Socialist Germany, and as long as the great majority of Jews around the world showed little eagerness to resettle in the Zionist “promised land,” a sovereign Jewish state in Palestine would not really “solve” the international Jewish question. Instead, German officials reasoned, it would immeasurably strengthen this dangerous anti-German campaign. German backing for Zionism was therefore limited to support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine under British control, not a sovereign Jewish state.
A Jewish state in Palestine, the Foreign Minister informed diplomats in June 1937, would not be in Germany’s interest because it would not be able to absorb all Jews around the world, but would only serve as an additional power base for international Jewry, in much the same way as Moscow served as a base for international Communism. Reflecting something of a shift in official policy, the German press expressed much greater sympathy in 1937 for Palestinian Arab resistance to Zionist ambitions, at a time when tension and conflict between Jews and Arabs in Palestine was sharply increasing.
A Foreign Office circular bulletin of June 22, 1937, cautioned that in spite of support for Jewish settlement in Palestine, “it would nevertheless be a mistake to assume that Germany supports the formation of a state structure in Palestine under some form of Jewish control. In view of the anti-German agitation of international Jewry, Germany cannot agree that the formation of a Palestine Jewish state would help the peaceful development of the nations of the world.” “The proclamation of a Jewish state or a Jewish-administrated Palestine,” warned an internal memorandum by the Jewish affairs section of the SS, “would create for Germany a new enemy, one that would have a deep influence on developments in the Near East.” Another SS agency predicted that a Jewish state “would work to bring special minority protection to Jews in every country, therefore giving legal protection to the exploitation activity of world Jewry.” In January 1939, Hitler’s new Foreign Minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, likewise warned in another circular bulletin that “Germany must regard the formation of a Jewish state as dangerous” because it “would bring an international increase in power to world Jewry.”
Hitler and the NSDAP did not advocate for or support an independent Jewish state in Palestine. In fact, in Mein Kampf Hitler accurately described what a Jewish state would look like should the Gentile world allow it to happen:
The Jew’s domination in the state seems so assured that now not only can he call himself a Jew again, but he ruthlessly admits his ultimate national and political designs. A section of his race openly owns itself to be a foreign people, yet even here they lie. For while the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the national consciousness of the Jew finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again slyly dupe the dumb Goyim. It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.
Bottom line is, the Jews were dead set on establishing their criminal, usurping state in Palestine, not only to fulfill their twisted messianic prophecies, but also to gain a safe haven and central headquarters for their global crime syndicate, a fact Hitler recognized. He wanted the Jews out of Germany in order to rebuild German society after the devastation of WWI, correctly recognizing the subversive and destructive nature innate to the Jewish race. The Jews in Palestine perfected their use of terrorism and underhandedness and declared “independence” shortly after Germany’s defeat in WWII, using their fake “Holocaust” story and agents of influence across the globe to sell their false narrative of history to the rest of the world. And who were the first governments to recognize the illegitimate, terrorist state of “Israel”? Two of the countries most responsible for the genocidal annihilation of Hitler’s Germany, which was resisting the forces of international Jewry, not collaborating with them: the United States and Soviet Union.
On May 14, 1948, the leaders of the Jewish organizations in Palestine, headed by David Ben-Gurion,proclaimed the establishment of the State of Israel, to take effect at midnight that night.
At that point, the State of Israel came into existence. The United States recognized the provisional Jewish government as de facto authority of the Jewish state within minutes. The Soviet Union granted de jure recognition almost immediately in 1948 along with seven other states within the next five days (Guatemala, Byelorussia, the Ukraine, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Uruguay, and Yugoslavia). [Source]
Hitler and National Socialist Germany’s ultimate aim was the removal of the Jews from Germany and Europe, and they collaborated with the Zionist movement to accomplish this goal. After the Jews and their puppet Allies brutally destroyed Germany in WWII, which represented the greatest threat in recent history to the global Jewish crime network behind “The New World Order”, it was only a matter of time before “Israel” would be officially established.
Hitler was not “the founder of Israel” and in no way supported the establishment of an independent Jewish state in Palestine as many continue to claim. Hitler and National Socialist Germany were destroyed to pave the way for the establishment of Israel. Blaming Hitler and National Socialist Germany for something the Jews were determined to do on their own – with the assistance of their puppets in the West – is a gross distortion of history.
To conclude his ridiculous and unscholarly essay Hitler was a Zionist Stooge, J. Speer Williams claims that there are “deeper reasons” underlying why the Zionists brought Hitler to power, and that ultimately the end goal of the Zionist conspiracy is to “mutate and ultimately exterminate” the Semitic gene, which according to Williams included both Jews and Arabs. In the very next sentence, however, Williams admits that he can’t even prove his point:
But, again, I cannot prove any of that, except for the fact of depleting uranium being used in the Zionist Middle Eastern wars of US/Israeli aggression.
The only thing that can be demonstrably proven is that J. Speer Williams simply does not know what he is talking about, and is perpetuating myths and slanders about Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany, albeit of a different nature than the lies endlessly promoted by the mainstream mass media and educational establishment. J. Speer Williams and other disingenuous and ignorant individuals confusing the public with ridiculous and baseless theories that “Hitler was a Zionist stooge” are essentially doing the bidding of the Jews who have demonized and distorted the actions, legacy, and worldview of Adolf Hitler and National Socialism for so long. Please do not take these people seriously.
SOURCE Edited slightly and presented with pictures and captions by Lasha Darkmoon
“Slave auctions were postponed if they fell on a Jewish holiday. In Curacao in the seventeenth century, as well as in the British colonies of Barbados and Jamaica in the eighteenth century, Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated.” — Rabbi Marc Lee Raphael, Jews and Judaism in the United States: a Documentary Work.
Abraham Foxman, National Director of the Anti-Defamation League, has called Minister Louis Farrakhan, who is head of the Nation of Islam, an antisemite. This is because of Farrakhan’s criticism of Steven Spielberg’s latest movie Lincoln in which Spielberg ignored the fact that Jewish elites had funded both sides during the American Civil War, and that they had played a major role in the African slave which the hated president Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) wanted to stop.
And yet Rabbi Isaac M. Wise in his eulogy of President Lincoln had said:
“The lamented Abraham Lincoln believed himself to be bone from our bone and flesh from our flesh. He supposed himself to be a descendant of Hebrew parentage. He said so in my presence.”
Hollywood director Steven Spielberg is founder of the Shoah Foundation. He has been rebuked by several fellow Jewish scholars for making sensational storiesto promote the Zionist version of ‘Six Million Died’. In order to prove the Jewish Lobby grip over American politics, the movie Lincoln was actually screened at the US Senate on December 19, 2012.
According to Nation of Islam research, the Jew Erlanger loaned $7 million dollars to the Confederacy (about $125 million in today’s money). Erlanger made the deal through a Jewish lawyer and slaveowner from Louisiana named Judah P. Benjamin, who served as the Vice President of the Confederacy as well as its Secretary of War. He was known as the “brains of the Confederacy.” So important was the Jew Benjamin to the slaveholders that a picture of his face appeared on their money.
Apparently Judah Benjamin failed to pass Spielberg’s audition, because he is not in the movie!
Benjamin was to flee from America, taking a huge number of cotton bales with him in order to finance his extravagant lifestyle in exile. After the war, he used his slave-picked cotton profits to invest in a new start-up organization – a terrorist group, wait for it, known as the Ku Klux Klan!
Other Jewish elites missing from Steven Spielberg’s movie include America’s first Jewish senator, David Yulee (Florida), a fanatical supporter of African slavery and ethnic-cleansing of Native Indians; New York Jewish banker and chairman of the Democratic Party, August Belmont; and New York-based Rabbi Morris Raphall, who aided and abetted the slaveholders by publicly proclaiming that God Himself supported slavery!
Spielberg wants us to believe that Blacks were President Lincoln’s main problem, but Lincoln had lots of trouble with the Jews of his time. An official of Lincoln’s government actually deemed the main Jewish organization, the B’nai B’rith, to be a “disloyal organization [that] helps the traitors”. (Read Nation of Islam article here)
JEWISH SLAVE TRADER “God himself approves of the slave trade.” — Rabbi Morris Raphall
Steven Spielberg’s 1997 so-called historic movie Amistad also dealt with Black slavery. The movie blamed White Christians for trading in nearly 100 million African slaves, out of which only 10 million reached western countries, while the rest perished during the voyage.
Apart from the fact that Jews were the kingpins behind the slave trade, a fact which Spielberg conveniently omits to mention, Jewish historian Edward Bristow in his 1982 book, Prostitution and Prejudice, wrote that Jewish elites were involved in an entirely different kind of slavery: sex slavery.
The Jews had exploited White women and children for centuries in the sex slave and prostitution industries and they were the chief owners of the most sumptuous brothels throughout Europe. Apparently a huge number of the prostitutes in these brothels were Jewesses who had been lured into a life of sexual degradation by their fellow Jews. For more information on this shocking subject, see Lasha Darkmoon’s “Sex and the Jews: Letter to a Jewish Correspondent.”
For another article on this topic by Dr William Peirce, see here.
ENSLAVED CHILD PROSTITUTES
Since the recent Sandy Hook shootings, which according to Republican politician Michael Harris, was the handiwork of an Israeli death squad, Jewish organizations along with Barack Obama are leading the current campaign in support of gun control.
On December 2, 2011, American Jewish journalist, Max Blumenthal, wrote in the Lebanese daily al-Akhbar that American domestic security services are totally controlled by the local Israeli agents. This could be the reason that Jewish groups consider guns in Americans’ hands as a serious threat to their domination of American government and law enforcement agencies.
Adam Bilzerian wrote on December 22 that even after their experience under Nazi rule, when Jews were not permitted to possess guns, Jewish Americans are the loudest proponents of gun control.
In fact, every piece of gun legislation in the US has been introduced or sponsored by Jewish lawmakers – from Rep. Emanuel Cellar (in 1968) to Senators Lautenberg and Feinstein (in 2005). Read the article in full here.
BOLSHEVIK JEW KILLERS. ACCORDING TO SOLZHENITSYN,
THEY KILLED 66 MILLION RUSSIAN CHRISTIANS
BETWEEN 1917 AND 1953. (See HERE)
NOW THE JEWS WANT “GUN CONTROL” IN AMERICA! W H Y ?
Why is gun control in America so important to Jews?
Arnon Soffer, Ariel Sharon’s adviser,
explaining how important it is for Jews
to kill… and kill… and go on killing.
Watch this 8-minute video showing how the American police have become a law unto themselves. Remember, these guys are trained in Israel, and every step they take is carefully monitored and approved by their Masters in Israel. Their supervisors are flown outto Israel on free junkets and issued there with detailed instructions on how to police America and make it a jungle of police lawlessness and brutality.
Here is Abby Martin talking to well-known survivalist and firefighter Fernando Salguero who was targeted last week by the New Jersey police. Why? Because they didn’t like his “survivalist lifestyle”. This apparently runs counter to the wishes of Tel Aviv which would like to see all Americans disarmed in conformity with the wishes of the Bolshevik Jews who now run America.
To watch this thought-provoking 8-minite video, click HERE
Based on an original article (see here) by Timothy Matthews.
Abbreviated and adapted with additional material by Lasha Darkmoon.
“GOD IS DEAD! . . . BEHOLD, I GIVE YOU THE SUPERMAN!” — Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spake Zarathustra
Let’s begin by considering the corrosive work of the Frankfurt School: a group of German-American scholars, mostly Jewish, who developed highly provocative and original perspectives on contemporary society and culture, drawing on Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, and Weber.
Their idea of a “cultural revolution” was not particularly new. Joseph, Comte de Maistre (1753-1821), who for fifteen years had been a Freemason, had this to say: “Until now, nations were killed by conquest, that is by invasion. But here an important question arises: can a nation not die on its own soil, without resettlement or invasion, by allowing the flies of decomposition to corrupt to the very core those original and constituent principles which make it what it is?”
What was the Frankfurt School?
Well, in the days following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, it was believed that a Workers’ Revolution would sweep into Europe and, eventually, into the United States. It failed to do so. Towards the end of 1922, the Communist International (Comintern) began to consider the reasons for this failure.
On Lenin’s initiative, a meeting was organized at the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow. The aim of the meeting was to throw light on the meaning of Marx’s Cultural Revolution. What did “cultural revolution” entail? What was it all about?
First, among those present, was Georg Lukács, a Jewish Hungarian aristocrat and son of a banker. He had become a Communist during World War I. A good Marxist theoretician, he had developed the idea of “Revolution and Eros” — sexual instinct used as an instrument of destruction.
Then there was Willi Münzenberg, another revolutionary Jew whose proposed solution to the problems besetting society was “to organize the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilization stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.”
“It was”, said Ralph de Toledano (1916-2007), the conservative author and co-founder of the National Review, “a meeting more harmful to Western civilization than the Bolshevik Revolution itself.”
Lenin died in 1924, but by that time Stalin had risen to power and was beginning to look on Willi Munzenberg, George Lukács and other Jewish revolutionaries (like Trotsky) as dangerous Marxist “revisionists”, introducing concepts into Marxism that were alien to Marxism and which served only a Jewish agenda.
In June 1940, on Stalin’s orders, Münzenberg was hunted down to the south of France by a NKVD assassination squad and hanged from a tree.
In the summer of 1924, after being attacked for his writings by the Fifth Comintern Congress, Lukács moved to Germany. Here he chaired the first meeting of a group of Communist oriented sociologists. This gathering was to lead to the foundation of the Frankfurt School.
This “School”, designed to put flesh on their revolutionary program, was started at the University of Frankfurt in the Institut für Sozialforschung. To begin with, school and institute were indistinguishable. In 1923, the Institute had been officially established, and funded by Felix Weil (1898-1975). Weil, born in Argentina into a wealthy Jewish family, was sent to attend school in Germany at the age of nine. He attended the universities in Tübingen and Frankfurt, where he graduated with a doctoral degree in political science. While at these universities he became increasingly interested in socialism and Marxism.
Carl Grünberg, the Institute’s Jewish director from 1923-1929, was an avowed Marxist, although the Institute did not have any official party affiliations. But in 1930 Max Horkheimer (also Jewish) assumed control. He believed that Marx’s theory should be the basis of the Institute’s research.
When Hitler came to power, the Institute was closed and its members, by various routes, fled to the United States and ended up as academics at major US universities: Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and California at Berkeley.
LD: The fact that they spoke very poor English was no disqualification. They were Jewish, and so they managed to obtain prestigious academic appointments through Jewish influence, i.e., through networking — a system that works exceptionally well even today and which accounts for the huge and unfair preponderance of Jews in academia.
The School included among its members the 1960s guru of the New Left Herbert Marcuse — denounced by Pope Paul VI for his theory of liberation which “opens the way for [sexual] licence cloaked as liberty” — Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, the popular writer Erich Fromm, Leo Lowenthal, and Jurgen Habermas. All these individuals except Habermas were of Jewish origin.
Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief — or even the hope of belief — that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke a socialist revolution.
Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the “Judaeo-Christian legacy.”
LD: “Judeo-Christian” is an oxymoron, a contradiction in terms, given that Judaism and Christianity are at opposite ends of the religious spectrum. Since most Jews are actively hostile to Christianity, and since Talmudic Jews actually take pleasure in the thought of Christ being boiled in excrement in hell, to speak of the “Judeo-Christian legacy” is clearly nonsensical.
To undermine Western civilization, the Frankfurt School Jews called for the most negative and destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life. To de-stabilize society and bring it to its knees, to engineer collapse, to produce crisis and catastrophe — this became the aim of these maladjusted and mentally sick Jewish revolutionaries masquerading as high-powered intellectuals.
Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus — “continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means”, as one of their members noted.
To further the advance of their “quiet” cultural revolution, the Frankfurt School made the following twelve recommendations — all of them calculated to undermine the foundations of society and create the dystopia we now see all around us:
1. The creation of racism offences and hate speech laws. 2. Continual change to create confusion (e,g., in school curricula). 3. Masturbation propaganda in schools, combined with the homosexualization of children and their corruption by exposing them to child porn in the classroom. 4. The systematic undermining of parental and teachers’ authority. 5. Huge immigration to destroy national identity and foment future race wars. 6. The systematic promotion of excessive drinking and recreational drugs. 7. The systematic promotion of sexual deviance in society. 8. An unreliable legal system with bias against the victims of crime. 9. Dependency on state benefits. 10. Control and dumbing down of media. (Six Jewish companies now control 96 percent of the world’s media. LD). 11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family. 12. All all-out attack on Christianity and the emptying of churches.
LD: In the Soviet Union, under Stalin and his Communist Jews, the emptying of churches was accomplished by the simple expedient of burning the churches down—thousands of them.
(See here, here, here, here and herefor more details on the systematic destruction of Christian churches and the persecution of Russian Christians under the Jewish leaders of the Russian Revolution. See alsoextended endnote.)
Coincidentally, most of the 12 aims and objectives mentioned above were set out prominently in the pages of that alleged “forgery”, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. The Jewish philosophers of the Frankfurt School, it seems, had been heavily influenced by the Protocols. They were clearly impressed by what they read there and decided to implement its recommendations in their own sinister agenda.
One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of “pansexualism”: the search for indiscriminate sexual pleasure, the promotion of “unisex”, the blurring of distinctions between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women, and, finally, the undermining of heterosexuality at the expense of homosexuality — as, for example, in the idea of “same-sex marriage” and the adoption of children by homosexual couples.
Willi Münzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus: “We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.”
JEWISH REVOLUTIONARY OF THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL
“We must organise the intellectuals and use them TO MAKE WESTERN CIVILIZATION STINK! Only then, after they have CORRUPTED ALL ITS VALUES AND MADE LIFE IMPOSSIBLE, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.” (Emphasis added)
LD: According to Sean McMeekin’s The Red Millionaire: A political biography of Willi Münzenberg, Münzenberg was “the perpetrator of some of the most colossal lies of the modern age…. He helped unleash a plague of moral blindness upon the world from which we have still not recovered.”
The Frankfurt School believed there were two types of revolution: (a) Political revolution and (b) Cultural revolution. They were more concerned with cultural revolution, the demolition of the established order from within. “Modern forms of subjection are marked by mildness”, they taught. So-called “reforms” were to be made so slowly and subtly that these changes for the worse were barely perceptible. The School saw the undermining of the social order as a long-term project.
LD: The systematic erosion of Christian moral values and the promotion of sexual perversion is known as cultural Marxism. Today, thanks to the efforts of organized Jewry which controls 96 percent of the world’s media, cultural Marxism has largely triumphed and Christianity lies in ruins. To many dispassionate observers, society has now reached its rockbottom moral nadir — as Jewish Marxists such as Willi Munzenberg (see quote above) would have been only too happy to witness — had he been around today.
These iconoclasts kept their sights firmly fixed on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture. Each of these would be their target. If things did not go from bad to worse, year after year, they were not succeeding. To these revolutionary Jewish thinkers, bad was good — and worse was better.
The Destruction of the Family and the Promotion of Feminism
The School’s Critical Theory preached that the “authoritarian personality” was a product of the patriarchal family — an idea directly linked to Engels’ Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State, which promoted matriarchy.
Already Karl Marx had written, in the Communist Manifesto (1848), about the radical notion of a “community of women”. In The German Ideology (1845), he had written disparagingly about the idea of the family as the basic unit of society. This was one of the basic tenets of the Critical Theory: the need to break down the family unit.
LD: All families were essentially evil, these thinkers believed — even happy families — so they had to be destroyed. It was better if children had no parents, or did not know who their parents were. Or if they were orphans of the state. It was better if romantic love between the sexes, leading to stable long-term marriages, were destroyed in favor of short-term, unstable, promiscuous relationships. After all, the former might lead to happiness for all concerned, and that was clearly impermissible — for the whole point of the Cultural Revolution was “to create a culture of pessimism” (Lukács) and “to make life impossible for everyone.” (Münzenberg).
Georg Lukács (1885–1971): “I want a culture of pessimism … a world abandoned by God”
The Institute scholars therefore preached that “Even a partial breakdown of parental authority in the family might tend to increase the readiness of a coming generation to accept social change.”
LD: These neo-Freudian Marxist philosophers of the Frankfurt School were clearly out to create trouble: to drive a wedge between parent and child and sow division in the family. Whatever was good in human relationships simply had to be destroyed. If people didn’t have problems, then problems would have to be manufactured “to make life impossible.” (Munzenberg).
All this prepared the way for the warfare against the masculine gender promoted by Marcuse under the guise of “Women’s liberation” and by the New Left movement in the 1960s. They proposed transforming our culture into a female-dominated one.
LD: The idea that women should run society and wear the trousers, telling men what to do, had an enormous appeal to certain bossy types of women with a surplus of testosterone, particularly to butch lesbians and man-hating matriarchs. Many of these misguided females were to become evangelists for radical Feminism, some even proposing to cut themselves off from the male sex completely and live in communes of their own. Curiously enough, the number of Jewish feminists is huge—out of all proportion to their percentage in the population.
In 1933, Wilhelm Reich, an honored and adulated member of the Frankfurt School, wrote in The Mass Psychology of Fascism that matriarchy was the only genuine family type of “natural society.” He was, as such, to be an inspiration to the feminists.
LD: Reich, incidentally, a compulsive masturbator and sexual pervert, had entertained incestuous longings for his own mother and practiced bestiality with horses while still a child. (See here).
This versatile sexual deviant, now a cult figure on the left, along with the equally sex-obsessed Herbert Marcuse—popularizer of the slogan MAKE LOVE, NOT WAR—were to be godfathers of the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s as well as the patron saints of the Feminist movement.
The Indoctrination of Children through Education
Bertrand Russell was to join the Frankfurt School in their efforts at mass social engineering. He spilled the beans in his 1951 book, The Impact of Science on Society. He wrote:
“The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First, that the influence of home is obstructive. Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity.
But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray.
When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.”
LD: The irony is unmistakable, but that is beside the point. Russell was all for turning the world upside down and ushering in Brave New World: atheism, feminism, and “sexual liberation” i.e., the green light to promiscuity, perversion, and abortion on demand.
The devaluation of values so sought after by the luminaries of the Frankfurt School has now largely been achieved through sex education and media propaganda: in particular, by the promotion of masturbation, pornography, and the systematic high pressure salesmanship of homosexuality in schools.
POSTER ON A CLASSROOM WALL
LD: This, then, is the secret agenda of organized Jewry as represented by the Cultural Marxists of the Frankfurt School: the destruction of traditional values, the destruction of the moral order, the destruction of the family unit, the destruction of religion, the destruction of meaning and purpose, and, finally, the destruction of happiness itself.
These are the people who now rule over us. They are in control. They create new wars with the same rapidity that a stage magician pulls rabbits from a hat. And they make sure that the people they rule over, their subject populations, are either demoralized debt slaves in insecure jobs or unemployed bums living on state benefits and a diet of junk food and sleazy junk entertainment laid on by the Jews.
Satan’s Secret Agents have been only too successful in creating a New World Order that bears a remarkable resemblance to hell.
* * *
Endnote by Lasha Darkmoon
American historian Edwin Schoonmaker writes:
Fifteen years after the Bolshevist Revolution was launched to carry out the Marxist program, the editor of the American Hebrew could write: “According to such information that the writer could secure while in Russia a few weeks ago, not one Jewish synagogue has been torn down, as have hundreds—perhaps thousands of the Greek Catholic Churches… In Moscow and other large cities one can see Christian churches in the process of destruction… the Government needs the location for a large building,” (American Hebrew, Nov. 18, 1932, p. 12) Apostate Jews, leading a revolution that was to destroy religion as the “opiate of the people” had somehow spared the synagogues of Russia.” (“Democracy and World Dominion,” 1939, p.211).
Wikipedia tells us that the Communist state after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution was “committed to the destruction of religion”, anddestroyed churches, mosques and temples — no mention of synagogues being destroyed — and that it “ridiculed, harassed and executed [Christian] religious leaders, flood[ing] the schools and media with atheistic propaganda.”
Since the Russian Revolution was essentially a Jewish revolution, with an overwhelmingly high percentage of its leaders being Jewish, one can understand why synagogues were NOT destroyed. The animosity of the Jewish leadership was directed almost exclusively toward the Christian clergy and their churches. Monks, nuns and priests were put to death in large numbers, often after being cruelly tortured in the process, their eyes gouged out and in some instances being boiled alive. (For graphic details of the systematic torture of Christians under the Bolsheviks, see here and section 7, “Fiendish tortures devised by the Jewish cheka”, here).
According to the Atlantic, September 1991, p.14, “In 1919, three-quarters of the Cheka staff in Kiev were Jews, who were careful to spare fellow Jews. (See footnote 21, here)
For more on the specifically Jewish character of the Russian Revolution, see here and here.
Russian-born Jewish writer Sonya Margolina goes so far as to call the Jewish role in supporting the Bolshevik regime the “historic sin of the Jews.” She points, for example, to the prominent role of Jews as commandants of Soviet Gulag concentration and labor camps, and the role of Jewish Communists in the systematic destruction of Russian churches. Moreover, she goes on, “The Jews of the entire world supported Soviet power, and remained silent in the face of any criticism from the opposition.”
In light of this record, Margolina offers a grim prediction:
“The exaggeratedly enthusiastic participation of the Jewish Bolsheviks in the subjugation and destruction of Russia is a sin that will be avenged. Soviet power will be equated with Jewish power, and the furious hatred against the Bolsheviks will become hatred against Jews.” (Cited here)
Anti-Jewish cartoon from a German school book for children (c. 1935) alleging the sexual exploitation of German women by Jewish men.
8. The sexually corrupted have now become the corrupters
The impression one gets by reading Rabbi Dresner’s book—Can Families Survive in Pagan America?—is that over the course of the twentieth century in America the Jews have suffered one of the greatest defeats in their history.
Dresner blames this defeat on assimilation, but the irony is that the Jews were corrupting America’s morals at the same time that they were undergoing moral corruption themselves by assimilating so successfully in America.
Assimilation means the adoption of pagan sexual mores of the sort that nearly destroyed the Israelites at the time of the Book of Kings. The Jews who came to America, who arrived from the Polish shtetls, arrived to find a ruling class more interested in Darwin than in Christ. They adopted the worst aspects of modernity and became both the corrupted and—because of their influence in the media—the corrupters simultaneously.