LD : Jared Kushner, Donald Trump’s Jewish son-in-law, has suddenly become “the most influential Jew in the world.” Like Trump, he will have access to top secret security files. Does the name “Jonathan Pollard” not ring a bell? Can Jared Kushner—”the power behind the throne”, to quote the Jewish writer of this article—really be trusted not to pass on classified information to Israeli intelligence? Read More
One way to stage a coup “legally” is to rent a protest mob. This was done in Ancient Rome. It’s not new. Who has the resources to pay unemployed yahoos a salary of $2500 a month (plus $50 an hour thereafter) for shouting and screaming and waving mass-produced banners? — in order to bring down a democratically leader who is seen as a threat to the (((New World Order)))?
By Paul Craig Roberts
January 18, 2017
IF THEY CAN’T KILL HIM,
THEY CAN WOUND HIM
Unless this website is an Internet hoax, big money is organizing a Maidan-like protest against Trump’s inauguration. Where would all this money come from? George Soros? the National Endowment for Democracy? the CIA? Read More
Sourced from an article in the Daily Mail,
edited and abridged by Lasha Darkmoon
with additional notes and comments
DONALD TRUMP IS INTERVIEWED
BY THE TIMES (UK) LAST WEEK
Trump praises Brexit, dissses the EU, rubbishes Angela Merkel, speaks glowingly about Israel, and puts his Jewish son-in-law in charge of negotiating a “peace deal” with the Palestinians. The CIA warns him to watch his step and “be very careful.” Read More
The CIA is out to get Trump. If they can’t discredit and delegitimize him, they will almost certainly stage a coup and kill him sooner or later. (See controversial 32-minute video at end of article). Highly suspicious of the state’s own officially appointed bodyguards, Trump has now found it necessary to surround himself by his own carefully vetted security personnel. He feels safer at Trump Tower than in the White House. It’s come to that.
By Paul Craig Roberts
Reuters reports that 2,700 US troops accompanied by tanks are moving across Poland toward the Russian border. Col. Christopher Norrie, commander of the 3rd Armoured Brigade Combat Team, declared: “The main goal of our mission is deterrence and prevention of threats.” Apparently, the colonel is not sufficiently bright to realize that far from preventing threats, the force he is leading presents as a threat. And to no less a military power than Russia. Read More
Yesha Council says it has received invite to ceremony
after UN condemns illegal settlements
Donald Trump has pledged to move the US embassy
from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, Reuters
An Israeli settler group says it has been invited to attend Donald Trump’s inauguration as controversy continues over the President-elect’s stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The Yesha Council represents Jewish settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories that are held to be illegal under international law. Read More
By KATHLEEN DYNAN
“FAKE NEWS SITES ARE DRIVING ME CRAZY!”
Yesterday, a garbage-filled, liberal website posted lies, misinformation and libel in a weak, vulgar attempt to slander our incoming President. The progressive cable network, CNN, jumped on board immediately and spent their day on air slandering Donald Trump and others. Read More
Putin has dropped some bombshells on the New World Order that were completely ignored by the Western media. Includes explosive video.
According to Tom Delay, former US House Majority Leader of the US Justice Department, a secret memo has just been discovered discussing the promotion of 12 of the most shocking sexual perversions, including the normalization of bestiality and the legalization of sex with little children, including infants and toddlers of both sexes.
Our leaders are criminals who should be punished!
THE LIES THEY TOLD MURDERED MILLIONS!
Demagogues who claim they are above the law are beneath contempt
When criminals have the power of government on their side, there is no stopping them. History shows the only way of altering these familiar reigns of terror is stealing the government back from them by any means necessary.
By Jonas E. Alexis et al
Jonas Alexis and three revisionists put Deborah Lipstadt on trial for her book on Holocaust denial. They find Lipstadt and the Hollywood movie makers of ‘Denial’, based on the David Irving court case, guilty of lying.
David Merlin: The movie Denial is the Holocaust Establishment’s latest insult to the intelligence of the public. Denial is loosely based on the defamation trial between British historian David Irving and Holocaust studies professor Deborah Lipstadt and is loudly promoted as an “incredible, unbelievable story of two people pitted against each other in a battle over truth, history and integrity.”
By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS
“Trump is a strong man, but don’t be surprised if he comes out of the briefing with the CIA accepting their story, as he might be brought to the realization that the alternative to compliance with the CIA could be death.”
From an article in The Daily Mail,
abridged by Lasha Darkmoon
PIERS MORGAN WRITES, 5 January 2017. Few things shock me, as a hard-bitten journalist. But today, I’m in shock. I just watched a video that didn’t just sicken me, it contaminated every pore of my soul with feelings of pure, unadulterated, raw disgust and hatred. The short piece of film I endured depicts a gang of four black teenage thugs, two male, two female (pictured below), abusing and torturing a poor terrified young white man with special needs. The sheer scale of their depravity appears to know no bounds.
These smirking scumbags tie him up, gag him, kick him, punch him, scalp him by viciously slashing his hair with a knife, and flick burning cigarette ash on the head wounds they inflict in the process. Read More
By Jonas E. Alexis on January 4, 2017
Long before Netanyahu came on the political scene, Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir compared the Palestinians to “grasshoppers.”
Human Rights Watch has just condemned Israel’s shoot-to-kill policy. The policy is pretty simple. If the Israeli Defense Force and police officers perceive or think that a Palestinian is about to commit a crime, then Israeli officials encourage the IDF to take that Palestinian down immediately and without hesitation. Read More
Obama did the right thing not to veto the recent anti-Israel UN Resolution, and Trump did the wrong thing to give Israel his full backing and promise to move the US embassy to Jerusalem to appease the Zionist Lobby.
By Daniel Larison
THE THEFT OF PALESTINE
BY THE JEWS
WITH THE FULL BACKING OF THE US
Bloomberg’s editorial condemning the U.S. abstention on UNSCR 2334 is comically overwrought:
President Barack Obama’s ill-advised decision to order the U.S. to abstain on a United Nations resolution condemning Israeli settlements breaks with past U.S. policy, undermines a vital ally and sets back the cause of Middle East peace.
There are many weak arguments against the recent Security Council resolution, but the claim that it “sets back the cause of Middle East peace” stands out for its sheer bad faith.
There is a broad international consensus that settlement-building in the occupied territories is both illegal and a barrier to a negotiated resolution of the conflict. No one who is genuinely interested in securing a negotiated resolution of the conflict thinks that continued settlement construction makes a peace agreement more likely.
One of the main reasons for continued construction is to establish de facto control over most of the territory that has been occupied while leaving less and less land for the Palestinians so that it becomes impossible for them to have their own state.
If that continues, it sets Israel up to rule over a stateless, subject people in perpetuity, and that will be a disaster for all involved. If making an attempt to oppose that dreadful outcome constitutes “betrayal,” I shudder to think what loyalty is supposed to look like.
Calling out Israel for its ongoing illegal behavior becomes unavoidable when there is no progress in resolving the conflict, and the current Israeli government has made it very clear that there won’t be any progress. Criticizing Israel for behavior that has contributed to its increasing isolation in the world is not an unfriendly or treacherous act, and it ought to serve as a wake-up call to warn Israel away from a ruinous path.
The fact that many so-called “pro-Israel” Americans are denouncing the decision not to veto the resolution as a “betrayal” reminds us just how bad conventional “pro-Israel” advocates are for both the U.S. and Israel.
It is worth noting here that Israel isn’t actually an ally, much less a “vital” one, and it certainly isn’t “critical” to our security. The U.S. isn’t obliged to cater to some of the worst policies of a client government that has increasingly become a liability. The real problem with the U.S. abstention on the resolution is that it came many years after it might have done some significant good, and it comes so late because Obama wasted his entire presidency trying to “reassure” a government that undermined and opposed him time and again.
The editors’ recommended course of action is as foolish as the rest of the editorial:
Republicans and Democrats should start by agreeing to President-elect Donald Trump’s plans to move the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem — a step envisioned but never taken by presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. That would provide a powerful reaffirmation to Israel — a nation born after the slaughter of six million Jews, and under siege since its birth — of the U.S.’s enduring commitment, and to the world of Israel’s right to exist. That reaffirmation, in turn, is essential in providing Israel with the confidence to move ahead with a two-state solution.
Moving the embassy would have real and immediate costs for the U.S. with many other states, including more than a few allies in Europe.
Notice how the preferences and wishes of our actual allies count for nothing in these matters.
It would do nothing good for Israel, and might very well provoke a new intifada.
Even if it didn’t get that bad, it would all but guarantee a dramatic souring of relations with many states in the region that have been tacitly cooperating with Israel. Nothing could be more pointless and short-sighted while also harming Israeli security, so of course that is what the “pro-Israel” editors think the U.S. should do.
LD : If Donald Trump continues to give his full backing to Israel and turns a blind eye to the building of further illegal settlements on Palestinian land—leading to another intifada and to further Israeli war atrocities in Gaza—he will have crossed the Rubicon into the blackest villainy. The continued backing of Trump by his Alt-Right supporters will then become morally indefensible. There can be no justification, under any circumstances, for the destruction of Palestine and the systematic murder and maiming of the Palestinian people.